Iron Man 3

[HacheMan]

Anyone seen it yet?

How would you compare it to the first & second one?'

(<)<

 

[Mr_Mark]

went big on action this time around, makes it worth seeing on a big screen.

Thats good to hear. Going to watch it this weekend. Its frustrating when you see something on the big screen and after its over wish you waited for dvd

 

[milwaukeemike]

^^ yeah i thought maybe too much action, too little storyline. i did like the whole "we create our own demons" theme, the regeneration was a little too close to terminator2, felt a little too been there, done that.

i think iron man 1, 2, and avengers were all probably better. still a fun movie in 3d at the theater, but i wouldn't put it up there with the first 2 spidermans or last 3 batmans.

 

[DeathEatsaCracker]

No where close to being as good as the first one and far better than the second. However, don't over analyze it because it gets worse the more you think about it.

 

[moocow]

Garbage film unless you paid money just to see things blow up. The dialogue and storyline is terrible. The villains are laughable. Couldnt help but feel as if they rushed the film to meet deadline.

 

[RoofTop]

Wait for Redbox to get it

 

[Murphy8276]

I havent seen 1 or 2.. should I?

@)


-murph

 

[HacheMan]

I havent seen 1 or 2.. should I?

@)




-murph

I think #1 is worth watching...

 

[Murphy8276]

I think #1 is worth watching...

thanks hache.. I might check out 1 and 2 if I am going to see 3 of course. I just am not big on the whole comic type action hero genre' usually...


-murph

 

[halekulani]

1 and 2 were better but i dont regret paying to see it in the theatre

 

[VegasJogger]

thanks hache.. I might check out 1 and 2 if I am going to see 3 of course. I just am not big on the whole comic type action hero genre' usually...


-murph

I thought #1 was pretty good, was not a big fan of #2 but it wasnt awful. #3 is better than #2 but not close to as good as #1
I agree with Hacheman, #1 is worth watching