Trump just said he took away the name “Crooked Hillary” because she doesn’t matter anymore.
LOL
You know why?
CAUSE SHE'S DEAD.
Bye bye satanic WITCH scumbag.
View attachment 69572
![]()
"no no this is all just conspiracy"
When conspiracy becomes TRUTH.
Trump just said he took away the name “Crooked Hillary” because she doesn’t matter anymore.
LOL
You know why?
CAUSE SHE'S DEAD.
Bye bye satanic WITCH scumbag.
View attachment 69572
![]()
I predict that WHEN the various polls showing support for him dropping dramatically both for the nominee for the Republican
and more importantly in the eyes of the overwhelming number of voters across the country regarding his overall popularity
and the confidence in him to serve as POTUS again is the time that he will come up with kind of excuse/lie such as the system
is rigged, a medical excuse, etc. to drop out of the race.
It goes without saying that the indictments and resultant convictions will also have a big impact on whether he remains in the race or
not.
In short the notion of his losing again is abhorrent to him and especially to Joe Biden, and he will do whatever it takes to ensure
that this does not happen!!

What I find laughable and/or sad is how some of Trump's supporters express their outrage in the form of this is the first time in
our history for this and that regarding Trump and what they deem as unacceptable behavior on the part of Jack Smith and the DOJ.
Perhaps they should look at the other side of the equation, which is this is the first time in history the country has had a person
of the caliber of Donald Trump, a person who has flouted the Constitution, has made up his own rules, and most importantly,
has compromised the security of the United States of America by taking documents to his home he had no business taking,
and then hiding and lying about them!!
Let's tell the whole story here!!
MSN
www.msn.com
You can believe Barr who has first-hand experience with matters like this or "legal experts" sbd and his cohorts
whose reality is a figure of their imaginations, hopes and projections!!
BILL BARR, FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL: Well, it started out under the Presidential Records Act and the Archives trying to retrieve documents that Trump had no right to have, but it quickly became clear what the government was worried about were these classified and very sensitive documents. I was shocked by the degree of sensitivity of these documents and how many there were, frankly.
And so, the government's agenda was to get those -- protect those documents and get them out. And I think it was perfectly appropriate to do that. It was a right thing to do, and I think the counts under Espionage Act that he willfully retained those documents are solid counts.
Now, I do think we have to wait and see the defense says, and what proves to be true. But I do think that half of what Andy McCarthy, which -- if even half of it is true, then he’s toast. I mean, it’s a pretty -- it’s a very detailed indictment, and it’s very, very damming.
And this idea of presenting Trump as a victim here -- a victim of a witch hunt is ridiculous. Yes, he’s been a victim in the past. Yes, his adversaries have obsessively pursued him with phony claims. And I’ve -- and I’ve been by his side defending against them when he is a victim.
But this is much different. He’s not a victim here. He was totally wrong that he had the right to have those documents.
Those documents are among the most sensitive secrets the country has. He -- they have to be in the custody of the archivist. He had no right to maintain them and retain them, and he kept them in a way at Mar-a-Lago, that anyone who really cares about national security would -- their stomach would churn at it.
SHANNON BREAM, FOX NEWS: So, you see these as different and separate from what he would term the Russian hoax, from what we saw from the Durham report? You see these as two totally separate tracks?
BARR: Yes, because in the Russia -- there was nothing -- there was no problem or issue underlying the Russia-gate claim. It was an effort to knock him out with a false claim.
Here, I think the government acted responsibly. They gave him every opportunity to return those documents. They acted with restraint. They were very differential to him and they were very patient.
They talked to him for almost a year to try to get those documents and he jerked them around. They finally went to a subpoena, and what did he do? According to the government, he lied and obstructed that subpoena.
And then they did a search, and they found a lot more documents. And they’re not even -- I don't think they’re even sure now whether they have everything.
So, they acted in a very patient way. And what they were met was, according to the government, and the indictment, very egregious obstruction.