One more time today so that anyone reading sbd's utter unproven and attention seeking bs can consider why as usual his take on
Hamlin is full of gaping holes as well as begging the question, poisoning the well, drawing conclusions from premises
have not been proven and at best are opinions, and most importantly that sbd unlike me knows virtually nothing
about to evaluate statistical data, which in itself is questionable, and what is needed to make any kind of statistical analysis reliable
and valid to draw conclusions:
Here you go:
Sbd is implying that the Covid Vaccination has a mind of its own and has decided for reasons unknown to target young athletes under
age 35 because 100 died ALLEGEDLY because of cardiac arrest,
Then he claims/"reasons" that in a 38-year period ending n 2004 the same number of people died of cardiac arrest.
Then because sbd has no idea of how to put together a logical thesis he flies, he makes the simplistic conclusion that the Covid Vaccine
is what caused the dramatic alleged increase.
I have several comments on this on this type of "reasoning" to make his case:
1) Let's see the actual documentation of the numbers he claims and the sources and how well they are respected
by the worldwide community.
2) Even if the figures were remotely true, one would have a factor in other possibilities for the increase rather than just
say that the increase was due to these athletes being vaccinated.
One would also have to do an extensive study about the two separate populations from two different eras in
order to ensure that the folks of both eras were similar in enough ways to conclude that the findings were/ae both
RELIABLE AND VALID-I had a strong minor in statistics in college and the two terms I just highlighted are the two
most important terms when evaluating statistical data.
3) And finally and this is in some ways the most interesting and important thing to consider of all.
For the sake of this discussion, let's assume that the data stated by sbd is correct.
Well unless I am missing something here, if the vaccine is as toxic as sbd claims for young athletes, then by simple logic
for older/everyday people, who are NOT athletes, one would assume that there would be a dramatic number percentage of deaths
of people who received the Covid Vaccinations and who died of a heart attack as opposed to the same 38-year time period
before there was Covid and obviously no vaccine.
To summarize which is based on my statistical knowledge and just common sense, what sbd has presented is nothing more
than an inconclusive NOTHING for reasons stated, and along the same lines is just one more example of sbd's
inability to post something that does NOT rely on begging the question, poisoning the well, and using non-sequiturs
to draw a conclusion, which has ZERO basis based on the sound and accepted principles of sample data and techniques.
?
savage1 and wilbur ??
