The reason that Sheriff Joe has virtually no chance of any kind against a skilled debater is that he makes it easy by destroying
himself in the eyes of any intelligent and objective observer.
In essence, all one has to do is look at his "debating" style.
in short, all he does is set a trap for himself by begging the question and poisoning the well at the outset, and then
trying to support this questionable and unproven premise with a bastardized form of deductive reasoning,
which in turn relies on opinion, more hearsay and unsupported gossip.
You might compare it to a hockey game when a goaltender relaxes when the whistle is blown by an official for
an offside pass at the same time an opposing player unleashes a blistering slapshot at him, because the play has been whistled
dead whether the shot goes in or not!!