I don't respond to/debate "analogies"
Of course you don't because you don't have the education, intellect or debating skill/experience to understand it relevance!!
The "empirical evidence" is all there.
I stated my empirical evidence as defined in the dictionary and which is accepted, and gave examples.
Conversely, unlike me, you have empirical evidence, something which everyone can see and touch figuratively speaking to
"prove it."
Simply saying that you have empirical evidence without showing how it has manifested itself(and no, begging the question
and poisoning the well don't get it done) but rather just throw out UNDOCUMENTED opinions, hearsay and gossip, cliched
and mantra as your "empirical evidence!"
Again I suggest you go back to "Sheriff's School) or at the very least read some books about how to effectively debate because
at the moment you haven't a clue as I ae shown time and time when I have confronted you with points and questions
which you have ignored and in most case headed for the hills
You're a complete brainwashed loon who can't handle reality outside of your FAKE NEWS!
Again banging down the gavel with insults and totally disregarding what I have documented about you, simoly discredits even
more what is already quite evident to any intelligent and objective reader!!