Even If The Jury Doesn’t Convict Sussmann, John Durham Has Won
Durham proved HRC was involved, pierced attorney-client privilege, exposed the AlfaGate hoax, revealed the MSM’s complicity in it, and set the stage for future prosecutions.
“[Measuring] Durham’s performance by the outcome in United States v. Sussmann would be a mistake. Also, especially in the case of an acquittal, it would ignore the valuable information exposed related to the broader Spygate scandal. Using that gauge as a measure, the special counsel’s office succeeded wildly.”
View attachment 34971
Remember, this trial is in DC.
The DS has a stronghold on everything here, especially the courts.
It is very possible, even likely, the jury was infiltrated by the DS.
Durham started at the bottom for a reason.
In addition to exposing what is stated above,
"Durham proved HRC was involved, pierced attorney-client privilege, exposed the AlfaGate hoax, revealed the MSM’s complicity in it, and set the stage for future prosecutions.", Durham also wanted to expose any corruption that exists in the court.
If the judges and courts can't be trusted where does this go?
Military tribunals.
