It is laughable and telling that until today you didn't cite any of this.REMEMBER THIS FROM 2 MONTHS AGO? ? ? ? ?
Perhaps now you understand why Sussmann didn't testify.
He already cut a deal and cooperated.
This was a "show trial". [optics]
It allowed Durham to expose the corrupt courts and the DS jury.
It also brought it all into full public view through fake news media who wanted nothing to do with the trial but now claiming "victory".
This trial was over before it even started.
Durham.
![]()
Each and every one of your posts stated and inferred that Sussman would get his due. as Colonel Sanders would prevail.
As is and has ALWAYS been the case with you, you have backup scenarios such as above this and/or simply move the goalposts
out when things don't go as you predicted what is 99.8% of the time to "prove" that you were correct right along.
This kind of thinking may work in the company of losers including those in this thread and the political ones, most notably
QAnons, but it does not work with very intelligent and educated and objective folks who have shown that they can see the this
smokescreen of bullshit on your part and will point it out to others!!!
What you posted is one glaring mumble jumble example of this!!
