I pretty much addressed this in what I just posted prior to this and have SUPREME CONFIDENCE that the history of what I and the
others have documented about you, you 99.8% FAILED predictions, FAILED GITMO BS, laughable and delusional
and attention-seeking that Trump won all fifty states and got over 90% of the Popular Votes(and those are just
for starters) as opposed to your desperate lies about me is what intelligent and objective people are going
to believe and rightfully so!!
Rather than address each in your post, which in essence I have done many times when you have posted the same, I am going to
quote one line to respond to.
It is this one:
"He doesn't even understand the simple concept that just because something hasn't happened yet or that because it's not in public view yet doesn't mean it hasn't happened or is a "failed prediction"."
Wow-Dow is up 825 points as I write this!!!
Anyways, re: your response about predictions, this is one which shows your total inability to use logic and reasoning and inability
to debate.
You say that it is a "simple concept" that just because something hasn't happened yet or not it public view, doesn't mean that it hasn't
happened or is a failed prediction.
I can rip this one to shreds very easily quite easily.
First of all, let's tell the whole story here.
It was and is YOU for example who has made and who continues to make hundreds of predictions about Trump's reinstatement
and/or devolution with either specific dates or using terminology such as "imminent," "very soon.'
Clearly, this has not happened yet using one's own eyes and ears as well as the media including Fox as the empirical evidence.
And then because you damn well realize that these predictions like this have not occurred, rather than admit it, you go off
and claim and infer that it may very well have happened already but is not in "public view."
Along the same line and using the same logic, maybe you should say that the world no longer exists, that everyone is dead,
and it is only some kind of optical illusion to think that the world still exists and that posters like you and me are actually
posting right now.
Secondly dismissing for no dismissing in what I just stated in #1, you seem to question what constitutes a failed prediction,
I am going to raise the question that if a prediction does not occur by a certain date or with suggestive words
such as you use that it is "imminent," "very soon," etc. then what should be deemed a fair amount of time to have elapsed
before the one who made the predictions simply acknowledges that his prediction failed to come true(ie accountability)??
Should we give it more days, weeks, months, or even years before the person (you) who made the prediction "cries Uncle,"
or on the other hand, if he (you) simply give it added time up until and including the last day ETERNITY for the prediction
to come true.
And finally and to be a bit more specific, I will let those reading my response decide whether your constant moving of the goalposts
re: such matters such as Trump's reinstatement/devolution when the your original prediction goes up in flames is acceptable
to them.