Of course you are right because the best he would be able to do would be to post an OPINION from one of his sources which differs
from what CNN says.
An example would be his claim that CNN lied or that it was fake news that Biden won the Election because one of his
sources said otherwise using their criterion, which would, in turn be their subjective opinion only as opposed to
the one of CNN.
On the other hand and using fpp/sbd as an example, no one can claim the term "fake news" on our part when we have documented
every day that his continued prediction that Trump's reinstatement/devolution was/is imminent going back to Election Day
of 2020 has not occurred.
In short unlike contrasting opinions as to who won the Election, the efficacy of the Covid Vaccines, etc. which are simply
based on whatever source one chooses to use to back up his opinion, there is no room for debate re: such matters as
Trump's reinstatement/ devolution simply because the existing evidence is not an opinion but rather ACTUAL FACT!!
www.nbcnews.com
