turnovers turnovers turnovers, the single most important stat in football
you're not winning with 5 turnovers, especially when two are in your red zone and two more lead to 14 points for your opponent
Peyton's pick six is a distant memory
Manning made the plays he had to, hit his timing patterns well, but I don't think he can throw anything deep on the money
Denver will be riding their WR's who are pretty darn good and that defense, which will probably have to keep up their dominating play
you're not winning with 5 turnovers, especially when two are in your red zone and two more lead to 14 points for your opponent
Peyton's pick six is a distant memory
Manning made the plays he had to, hit his timing patterns well, but I don't think he can throw anything deep on the money
Denver will be riding their WR's who are pretty darn good and that defense, which will probably have to keep up their dominating play
dude, I lost $ 318, I wasn't happy at all
and you're getting Gronked, just forgetaboutit
hno:
please define "5dimes standard closing line"?
They have the weirdest posted lines. I use them because I bet their reduced juice lines and I don't have to use their lines as posted here using the "free odds" link.
This week, the Pats are P -120 at 5dimes. Most places they're -1, they're -1.5 -108 at Heritage. In any wager, I just don't like giving up an unnecessary advantage and that's what you're trying to squeeze.
I simply haven't decided my counter offer yet
crack me up, getting weirder by the day around here
well, his arm was one of the reasons I liked KC, so it's kinda hard to define that without picking on him. And although he played better than I expected, I still don't like his arm at all. Denver will not win the turnover battle 5-1 every week, and lob passes, especially short lobs, will not be successful over 16 weeks. Teams will take that away, he'll have to connect downfield when they do and I don't think he can.
Now, for your homework assignment, please define the following
1) facetious
2) red herring
3) straw man
| Pos | Player | FPTS | |
| QB | Peyton Manning P | 21.24 | lock |
| RB | Chris Ivory Q | 0 | swap out |
| RB | Danny Woodhead | 0 | swap out |
| WR | Jordan Matthews | 0 | swap out |
| WR | Emmanuel Sanders | 28.7 | lock |
| WR | Demaryius Thomas P | 22.6 | lock |
| TE | Tyler Eifert | 0 | swap out |
| FLEX | Jordan Reed Q | 0 | swap out |
| DST | Saints | 0 | swap out |
| TOTAL FANTASY POINTS: 72.54 |
<thead style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
</thead><tbody style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
</tbody><tfoot style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">
</tfoot>
it's OK to play for an advantage, that's what we're here for
but I'm supposed to try and avoid that
I'm totally cool
it's OK to play for an advantage, that's what we're here for
but I'm supposed to try and avoid that
I'm totally cool
Since you keep throwing it around, I'll bite. What advantage was I playing for?
You're painting this picture of me that I'm a shot-taker and an advantage-player, and that's just not true and is very unappreciated.
vig, as of this morning 5dimes had P -125 while others had -1
5dimes has similar lines still on other games, like TN vs Cleve, they do that sort of thing all the time
two 125 lines turns an 8-7 win into a push
