...not. But jeeze, I got to think 4th and 19 is a better prayer than an onside kick attempt!!!
Pretending New member Joined Sep 21, 2004 Messages 484 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #1 ...not. But jeeze, I got to think 4th and 19 is a better prayer than an onside kick attempt!!!
killy New member Joined Jan 20, 2000 Messages 324 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #2 actually statistics will tell you the onside kick has a much better chance.
lander There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 & Joined Sep 20, 2004 Messages 15,270 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #3 An onside kick is what? 20% I can't imagine 4th & 19 against a fierce Bucs defense being any better (or even close for that matter).
An onside kick is what? 20% I can't imagine 4th & 19 against a fierce Bucs defense being any better (or even close for that matter).
Pretending New member Joined Sep 21, 2004 Messages 484 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #4 Well, I wouldn't figure on 20% for an onside kick but if the odds are beter than 4th and 19, I am glad to hear it. I still uspect 4th and 19 is easier but clearly I don't know. I'd prefer to be wrong here.
Well, I wouldn't figure on 20% for an onside kick but if the odds are beter than 4th and 19, I am glad to hear it. I still uspect 4th and 19 is easier but clearly I don't know. I'd prefer to be wrong here.
MadCapper Veteran Joined Aug 20, 2002 Messages 12,002 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #5 I am sure 4th and 19 is alot more probable than an onside kick NOT off a tee! -MC
killy New member Joined Jan 20, 2000 Messages 324 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #6 I have seen the stats before though it included 4th and 20+ yards. I will try to find it.
TheGeneral+ Another Day, Another Dollar Joined Mar 1, 2002 Messages 42,730 Tokens Nov 25, 2003 #7 There was a play call for 4th & 19, but there was nowhere to go and escape the pass rush. It was lose/lose.
There was a play call for 4th & 19, but there was nowhere to go and escape the pass rush. It was lose/lose.