$$$$$$$$$$ If you like money play these games™ $$$$$$$$$$

[jbragg10]

Like I said before, I will only be posting my large money plays on here. My small plays won't be posted. If you want my opinion on a game, please let me know and I will respond.

I am just looking at the card now, and here are a few that jump off the page to me. I will only be playing 1-5 plays a week. I will only play the games I am really confident about.

Here are some leans (plays will be posted later):
Oregon -11
Kansas -11
Miss. St +14.5

Like I said, these are only leans and will probably post more throughout the week. I will post actual plays later.

 

[hubbard316]

If Already taken the Orgeon and Kansas games!! Not sold on MS State yet though. G/L

 

[jbragg10]

My first play this week is here:
USC -6.5

 

[5-0SAT]

^ brilliant pick above. tommy trojan will cover easily. just like against vt, neb, virginia, arkansas, nd, i mean the list goes on and on. They don't lose on the road against non-conference and more importantly pete always covers the spread. gl, im on it as well.

 

[jbragg10]

^ brilliant pick above. tommy trojan will cover easily. just like against vt, neb, virginia, arkansas, nd, i mean the list goes on and on. They don't lose on the road against non-conference and more importantly pete always covers the spread. gl, im on it as well.

thanks and good luck to you!

 

[Flsunman]

Not trying to be a dick, but come on guy... "IF you like money?" Then you trademark it? Good god man...

You get obliterated in bases this year by posting this nonsense week in and week out. Just post your picks and stop acting like some dumbass tout. GL with your picks though.

 

[jbragg10]

Not trying to be a dick, but come on guy... "IF you like money?" Then you trademark it? Good god man...

You get obliterated in bases this year by posting this nonsense week in and week out. Just post your picks and stop acting like some dumbass tout. GL with your picks though.

31-17 65% in baseball is not nonsense.
thanks for the input ... but I will keep doing what I want to do.

 

[Flsunman]

GL this wknd, your Cats looked good vs Miami-O

 

[jbragg10]

thanks ... they did look good but they have a tough schedule ahead of them. This is one of UK's better teams, but they will still be something like 6-6 because of the tough schedule

 

[CHITOWNODAWG]

How can you not love east carolina this week as well, mountaineers just not as good without pat white and ecu still out to show last years upset wasnt a fluke

 

[jbragg10]

i am not done capping yet chitown

 

[tb06]

My first play this week is here:
USC -6.5

This was my first play I locked in this week, too... Good luck, J!

 

[PatsFanatic]

Jbragg--- How do think this Oregon team will respond to losing their "star" running back to suspension? I got burned by them last week as many did but have a feeling a bounce back game at home is in order...
GL this season. I will be watching as I did in baseball :toast:

BTW...its up to -12 at my local

 

[jmhino]

^ brilliant pick above. tommy trojan will cover easily. just like against vt, neb, virginia, arkansas, nd, i mean the list goes on and on. They don't lose on the road against non-conference and more importantly pete always covers the spread. gl, im on it as well.

I partially agree. The last time they lost ATS on the road against a non-conference team was in '02 against Kansas State. However, Pete's actually only 28-25 ATS since '05, and they're 1-4 ATS in their last 5 road games overall. That being said, this looks like an easy USC cover. So easy in fact that I'm starting to over think it and wondering if it's a trap at -6.5.

Several things concern me: a frosh QB starting in the Horseshoe, although USC will probably be looking to run run and run some more. But even though Navy ran it down their throats, Ohio St. got away from their bread and butter D trying to stop Navy's unorthodox offense. They used packages they'll probably never use again this year. They can't be THAT bad at rush D. And had Ohio St. made that 4th down in the 4th quarter, they had the 29-14 lead w/ a good chance to score again or at least run more clock so I'm thinking the final score wasn't indicative of how Ohio St. controlled the game.

:think2: I'm confusing myself. I may just have to lay off this one.

 

[jbragg10]

Jbragg--- How do think this Oregon team will respond to losing their "star" running back to suspension? I got burned by them last week as many did but have a feeling a bounce back game at home is in order...
GL this season. I will be watching as I did in baseball :toast:

BTW...its up to -12 at my local

I like Oregon up to about 13.
I really think they bounce back and load up on offense this week

 

[bigwillokc]

I partially agree. The last time they lost ATS on the road against a non-conference team was in '02 against Kansas State. However, Pete's actually only 28-25 ATS since '05, and they're 1-4 ATS in their last 5 road games overall. That being said, this looks like an easy USC cover. So easy in fact that I'm starting to over think it and wondering if it's a trap at -6.5.

Several things concern me: a frosh QB starting in the Horseshoe, although USC will probably be looking to run run and run some more. But even though Navy ran it down their throats, Ohio St. got away from their bread and butter D trying to stop Navy's unorthodox offense. They used packages they'll probably never use again this year. They can't be THAT bad at rush D. And had Ohio St. made that 4th down in the 4th quarter, they had the 29-14 lead w/ a good chance to score again or at least run more clock so I'm thinking the final score wasn't indicative of how Ohio St. controlled the game.

:think2: I'm confusing myself. I may just have to lay off this one.

I wouldn't put much stock into that ATS stat simply because 90% of the SC spreads have been 30+ points or something stupid......I would like to see his ATS numbers for spreads of 7 or less, though..

 

[GoForIt]

Since 2003, Southern Cal is 4-0 SU and ATS as Single-Digit Road Chalk
2003 USC vs Notre Dame SC favored by -8, USC wins 45-14
2006 USC vs Arkansas SC favored by -8, USC wins 50-14
2007 USC vs California SC favored by -4.5 USC wins 24-17
2007 USC vs Arizona State SC favored by 3, USC wins 44-24

 

[dland24]

Not trying to be a dick, but come on guy... "IF you like money?" Then you trademark it? Good god man...

You get obliterated in bases this year by posting this nonsense week in and week out. Just post your picks and stop acting like some dumbass tout. GL with your picks though.

jbragg10 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flsunman

Go cut yourself. Thanks for all you do Bragg.

 

[bigwillokc]

Since 2003, Southern Cal is 4-0 SU and ATS as Single-Digit Road Chalk
2003 USC vs Notre Dame SC favored by -8, USC wins 45-14
2006 USC vs Arkansas SC favored by -8, USC wins 50-14
2007 USC vs California SC favored by -4.5 USC wins 24-17
2007 USC vs Arizona State SC favored by 3, USC wins 44-24

That's what I'm talking about!

:toast:

 

[GoForIt]

Against the Big 10, USC is 7-0 SU and ATS since 2000--However, this will be their first true road game as they have had one home game and six neutrals (even though some of those were at the Rose Bowl which is alot closer to USC)
In those seven games the average line has been -6.4 which is ironic since I'm laying -6.5, They have won these games by an average of 21.6 points