If You Believe In Trap Spreads, Oakland +3 Is As Good As It Gets!

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
135
Tokens
New York Jets -3.0 @ Oakland Raiders +3.0

Public Perception:

Jets - Brett Favre continues to skew lines towards the Jets. People love him, and when he got traded to Jets, everyone started talking playoffs. After burying Arizona and covering against Cincinnati, no reason for the betting public to believe they can't cover a measly 3 points against the lowly Raiders.

Raiders - After firing Lane Kiffin, Al Davis went on to have one of the most bizarre press conferences ever. He, as well as the team, is a complete laughing stock. Tom Cable is not a capable head coach. They got completely destroyed by New Orleans (pass happy, like the Jets) but more alarmingly they were completely shut down on offense against a fairly mediocre defense. If they couldn't stop New Orleans, how will they stop the Jets?

The Matchups:

Jets 5th in NFL points scored for VS. Raiders 27th in points against.

Brett Favre VS. Raiders 25th ranked passing defense.

Raiders 29th ranked passing attack shouldn't be able to exploit the Jets bad passing defense...

Raiders 4th ranked rushing attack faces the Jet's 3rd ranked rushing defense.

Now I know this is oversimplified, but my point is simply this; the average capper looking at the stats sees a Raiders team that can't pass the ball and relies on the run, which is perfect for the Jets since their rushing defense is their strong point. The Jets, meanwhile, get to unleash Brett Favre on the league's 25th worst passing defense. We saw the simplicity that Cutler and Brees moved the ball against them with.

Conclusion:

Bookies know that the public overvalues the Jets and undervalues the Raiders. So they know they can tweak the spread accordingly (-a half point or two on the Jets, +half a point or two for the Raiders). Then you look at the statistics/capping 101 breakdown of this game, and there is a lot to like about the Jets here.

So why on earth is this spread only 3? And why hasn't it moved? EVERYONE is on the Jets, and everyone seems fine paying extra juice to take them at such a bargain number, too.

If you don't believe in trap spreads, take the Jets, they are clearly the pick. I for one will be on Oakland; way way way too obvious in my opinion that the books are up to something on this one.
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
5,533
Tokens
There isn't a single thing wrong with what has been said in this thread...but careful with the Jets...they are one of those story book teams this year...league knows damn well they want Farve in the playoffs...which means they win 10 plus...I wont bet for or against them this year....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
2,091
Tokens
New York Jets -3.0 @ Oakland Raiders +3.0

Public Perception:

Jets - Brett Favre continues to skew lines towards the Jets. People love him, and when he got traded to Jets, everyone started talking playoffs. After burying Arizona and covering against Cincinnati, no reason for the betting public to believe they can't cover a measly 3 points against the lowly Raiders.

Raiders - After firing Lane Kiffin, Al Davis went on to have one of the most bizarre press conferences ever. He, as well as the team, is a complete laughing stock. Tom Cable is not a capable head coach. They got completely destroyed by New Orleans (pass happy, like the Jets) but more alarmingly they were completely shut down on offense against a fairly mediocre defense. If they couldn't stop New Orleans, how will they stop the Jets?

The Matchups:

Jets 5th in NFL points scored for VS. Raiders 27th in points against.

Brett Favre VS. Raiders 25th ranked passing defense.

Raiders 29th ranked passing attack shouldn't be able to exploit the Jets bad passing defense...

Raiders 4th ranked rushing attack faces the Jet's 3rd ranked rushing defense.

Now I know this is oversimplified, but my point is simply this; the average capper looking at the stats sees a Raiders team that can't pass the ball and relies on the run, which is perfect for the Jets since their rushing defense is their strong point. The Jets, meanwhile, get to unleash Brett Favre on the league's 25th worst passing defense. We saw the simplicity that Cutler and Brees moved the ball against them with.

Conclusion:

Bookies know that the public overvalues the Jets and undervalues the Raiders. So they know they can tweak the spread accordingly (-a half point or two on the Jets, +half a point or two for the Raiders). Then you look at the statistics/capping 101 breakdown of this game, and there is a lot to like about the Jets here.

So why on earth is this spread only 3? And why hasn't it moved? EVERYONE is on the Jets, and everyone seems fine paying extra juice to take them at such a bargain number, too.

If you don't believe in trap spreads, take the Jets, they are clearly the pick. I for one will be on Oakland; way way way too obvious in my opinion that the books are up to something on this one.
The Raiders always get overvalued from the books. They were only 7.5 point dogs at the Saints who are much better than the Jets. So that line seems about right. Raiders have been very poor against the spread, both on the road and at home.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
135
Tokens
The Raiders always get overvalued from the books. They were only 7.5 point dogs at the Saints who are much better than the Jets. So that line seems about right. Raiders have been very poor against the spread, both on the road and at home.

Hindsight is 20/20... This team pushed Buffalo and San Diego to their limits, I didn't think the Raiders were a terrible bet with the points at New Orleans.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
12,082
Tokens
last time farve played oakland i think it was monday night in oakland and i think he had 5 tds im not a 100% sure though

really think this game can go either way raiders for sure have the potential and talent to win but their defense has been horrible in the 2nd half

taking the under for the 1st half and jets to win the game

sucks because i am an oakland fan, but sometimes u have to bet against your own team when there money involved lol
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,147
Tokens
books are begging for nyj money... but how do u bet on the raaaiders?

Far and away this is the "trap" game of the week. But how do u bet on the Raiders? Tough to do. You have to hold your nose to avoid the stench and place the bet.
 

RESPECT MY CONGLOMERATE: HG Hustler and Gambler
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Messages
1,060
Tokens
Want a trap? Thinking Buffalo beats SD is a trap, ALOT OF PEEPS on Buffalo, I'll take San Diego thank you.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
127
Tokens
My dream match-up. A team with lousy ownership against a name-brand quarterback layin less than 7.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,147
Tokens
My dream match-up. A team with lousy ownership against a name-brand quarterback layin less than 7.

This is exactly what a "trap" game is. The public's perception is that one team is so much better than the other that it can't lose and looks like one of the top plays of the week, season, etc.

If its so good and 88% of the public is pounding on the Jets, why hasn't the line moved to 3.5 or 4?
 

RX Senior
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
14,740
Tokens
ACTUally west to east is worse because they are losing hours 1pm westcoast teams facing east cost teams at the east coasts home is like money in the bank!!!!!!!

Giants are a play
Bills are a play
 

RX Senior
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
14,740
Tokens
Want a trap? Thinking Buffalo beats SD is a trap, ALOT OF PEEPS on Buffalo, I'll take San Diego thank you.


<TABLE class=bet cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=bet_cell_b style="BORDER-RIGHT: #999999 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1px solid"># 407 </TD><TD class=bet_cell_b style="BORDER-RIGHT: #999999 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1px solid">1:00pm </TD><TD class=bet_cell_b style="BORDER-RIGHT: #999999 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1px solid">Chargers vs Bills (Week 7) </TD><TD class=bet_cell_b style="BORDER-RIGHT: #999999 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1px solid">Bills 41.58%
Chargers 58.42%
</TD><TD class=bet_cell_b style="BORDER-RIGHT: #999999 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1px solid">11004 Bets</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Most forums are probably on the bills but average joes are on sd after last weeks performance
 

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
11,091
Tokens
My local has Oak +3, +100.

Jets ML -170 and Oak +3 +100 and hope for the middle?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
604
Tokens
ACTUally west to east is worse because they are losing hours 1pm westcoast teams facing east cost teams at the east coasts home is like money in the bank!!!!!!!

Giants are a play
Bills are a play


Don't leave out TB as a play, Seattle is travelling for the third time this season to the East coast:

Sun, Sep 7 Buffalo 10-34
Sun, Oct 5 NY Giants 6-44
Sun, Oct 19 @Tampa Bay

and just for shits and giggles get to come back again

Sun, Nov 9 @Miami

Tampa Bay could be the strongest play of the week.

Good Luck
 
Last edited:

RX Senior
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
14,740
Tokens
tampa and seattle aren't playing at 1pm though...............my trend is for 1pm games......but good luck on your choice
 

L5Y, USC is 4-0 vs SEC, outscoring them 167-48!!!
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,025
Tokens
last time farve played oakland i think it was monday night in oakland and i think he had 5 tds im not a 100% sure though

really think this game can go either way raiders for sure have the potential and talent to win but their defense has been horrible in the 2nd half

taking the under for the 1st half and jets to win the game

sucks because i am an oakland fan, but sometimes u have to bet against your own team when there money involved lol

MrMark. I too am a diehard from '72. And i gotta say, I've told myself I'd fade the Raiders the remainder of the year. Thats atleast a 60% winning percentage IMO. They are just god awful. And further more I truely believe that lockerroom has quit. I can say atleast the recievers except for Higgins has quit. Deangelo is always out of position. The running D sucks.

The only...ONLY reason i would think there's any potential is that line. The Jets should be at minimum a -6.5 road fav. So the 3.5 had me scratching my head as well.

I was thinking its either Jets or a pass this week. But again the 3.5 just seem too wierd.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
2,668
Tokens
raiduhs probably cover.... but how can you bet on em???????? they are just so bad, they are my team too
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,483
Members
100,886
Latest member
ranajeet
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com