If the SEC does not get 2 schools in the playoffs..

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
No, not because ESPN told me so - because they account for half the titles in the last 20 years - and that's with 5 teams winning titles - it's literally unimaginable for any other conference

exactly. I don't have any reason to hype the SEC. I watch more pac12 than SEC but if every pac12 team just played every sec team all year instead of regular schedules I'd take the SEC easily.

Oregon lost as a 23pt fav to UA at home. I mean your really making me suspend a lot of disbelief if your asking me to think the top 6-7 SEC teams wouldn't be able to shutdown UAs offense
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
exactly. I don't have any reason to hype the SEC. I watch more pac12 than SEC but if every pac12 team just played every sec team all year instead of regular schedules I'd take the SEC easily.

Oregon lost as a 23pt fav to UA at home. I mean your really making me suspend a lot of disbelief if your asking me to think the top 6-7 SEC teams wouldn't be able to shutdown UAs offense

Yeah, got it. UA is a really good football team.

But pumping up the SEC as an amazing defensive league is a joke. They are not.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
How come teams can't consistently score as much in the SEC as they can in the pac12? Is pac12 that much better offensively or could there be another factor at play?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Lol, you must not be watching the games this year. The PAC-12 is bad. The SEC probably has 6 teams that can beat any team in the PAC-12 this year.

Yo you got other things to think about, like how you're gonna probably be back on the Kirk Cousins bandwagon in an hour or so.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,877
Tokens
Enfuego, I don't like any SEC teams - I went to Cuse - I could care less about the SEC - but it is the equivalent of the ACC in hoops - it needs to be respected year in and year out until proven otherwise - I will defer to an SEC team that played an SEC schedule 8 days a week
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
Tough year. If ND runs the table they definitely need one of the two top spots. Nasty schedule. FSU will be in by default. Unless Big12 have Baylor run the table, they will be out. Big 10 only has MSU but they lost to Oregon. They will have to win out. SEC has Auburn, which will lose, UGA and Bama which have already lost.

As much as I love the SEC, there is no way they get 2.....unless everyone else ends up with 2 loses. Nobody talking about Zona?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
lol just saying he looks good tonight...squandered opportunity there though, don't get many chances in the RZ vs SEA
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
Lol, you must not be watching the games this year. The PAC-12 is bad. The SEC probably has 6 teams that can beat any team in the PAC-12 this year.

And there are 6 PAC-12 teams that can beat any SEC teams on any given Saturday.

UCLA
Oregon
Stanford
ASU
Arizona
UW

You're acting like the SEC would always win in a landslide. The difference isn't as big as you think it is.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
Enfuego, I don't like any SEC teams - I went to Cuse - I could care less about the SEC - but it is the equivalent of the ACC in hoops - it needs to be respected year in and year out until proven otherwise - I will defer to an SEC team that played an SEC schedule 8 days a week

But we're talking this year not other years. Didn't know you went to Cuse. Good school.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
I'm actually surprised the pac12 isn't better at football and bball. If I were a top recruit I'd rather go to like UA/ASU/Wash or UCLA/Cal on the higher end than the SEC schools anyday
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
And there are 6 PAC-12 teams that can beat any SEC teams on any given Saturday.

UCLA
Oregon
Stanford
ASU
Arizona
UW

You're acting like the SEC would always win in a landslide. The difference isn't as big as you think it is.

Lol, UW??? Those teams are bad this year. The SEC is by far the most dominant conference this year and the PAC-12 is on a down year. Their powers are rebuilding and struggling. Other than UCLA who just sucks. You're out of your mind if you think the PAC can compete with the sec powers this year.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
A lot of people seem to forget one of the PAC-12's worst teams went into Auburn last year (who played for the title) and lost 31-24. WSU had two chances to tie the game in the final 5:00.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
A lot of people seem to forget one of the PAC-12's worst teams went into Auburn last year (who played for the title) and lost 31-24. WSU had two chances to tie the game in the final 5:00.

Wsu also just lost 60-59 to cal. Auburn would destroy any PAC-12 team this year
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
A lot of people seem to forget one of the PAC-12's worst teams went into Auburn last year (who played for the title) and lost 31-24. WSU had two chances to tie the game in the final 5:00.

You said earlier what does previous years have to do with anything?
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,461
Tokens
Lol, UW??? Those teams are bad this year. The SEC is by far the most dominant conference this year and the PAC-12 is on a down year. Their powers are rebuilding and struggling. Other than UCLA who just sucks. You're out of your mind if you think the PAC can compete with the sec powers this year.

Ok, substitute USC in for UW. No worries. You're just trolling now.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,322
Messages
13,458,987
Members
99,467
Latest member
letty26
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com