If the Cavs sign Ron Artest, no one else has a chance!

Search

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
That team is going to be unbeatable in the playoffs. Might be the most winningest team of all-time. Wow. They are talking about signing Ariza too FYI.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
they dont have enough money to sign both.

id go for artest of the 2.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
they dont have enough money to sign both.

id go for artest of the 2.

Artest for 3 years guarantees at least 2 championships.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
3,112
Tokens
Cavs were the best team in the league LAST YEAR. They lost to Orlando by a couple bad breaks, which happens in a short series. Cleveland wins that series 8 times out of 10, just so happened that they got unlucky. They would win the championship next year with no changes.
 

New member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
6,559
Tokens
...Short series? Wtf?

Ya Artest would be a huge signing, as that's a HUGE team (physically and they play big as well)... Would be very tough for any team to match up.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
3,418
Tokens
You can't be serious..

Cavs were the best team in the league LAST YEAR.
If they were the best team in the league, they would have won the Championship, not been bounced in the ECF.

They lost to Orlando by a couple bad breaks, which happens in a short series.

This statement is just plain wrong. They lost to the Magic because of the match-up problems that they encountered, not by a "couple bad breaks". And what "short series" are you referring to?

Cleveland wins that series 8 times out of 10, just so happened that they got unlucky.

Teams don't get "unlucky" for an entire series. I can see this statement being justified if they got a terrible call that directly effected the outcome of the game, but that never happened. The truth is the Magic dominated them during the regular season, and they did it during the playoff's. What caused that? Match-up problems!

They would win the championship next year with no changes.

Not even close. The team chemistry may have been there with this past year's squad, but they didn't have the right players. If they had the right players, they would not have had the match-up problems that they did with the Magic and Dwight Howard (hence, why they went and got Shaq - at least until they can grab a better, younger free agent center in 2010).

You don't happen to live in Cleveland, do you? :):)
 

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
3,112
Tokens
If they were the best team in the league, they would have won the Championship, not been bounced in the ECF.
You believe that the best team always wins the championship? Pretty naive...
This statement is just plain wrong. They lost to the Magic because of the match-up problems that they encountered, not by a "couple bad breaks". And what "short series" are you referring to?
Well you have your opinion, and I have mine. The Cavs lost two games by a combined total of 3 points. That is the definition of unlucky breaks. One shot falls differently in either or both of those games and the series is entirely different. You don't remake your team when you lose like that. "Short Series:" just what it sounds like. 7 games is not enough to determine which team is better. Not advocating that they should go to 21 game series or anything, but to suggest that whichever team won a 7 game series is undoubtedly the better team is asinine. Luck plays a HUGE factor when you're only looking for 4 wins. And luck went against Cleveland.
Teams don't get "unlucky" for an entire series.
Laughable. It only takes one game to swing an entire series, and the Cavs got unlucky breaks in 2. That's plenty to have a determinate effect on the outcome.
I can see this statement being justified if they got a terrible call that directly effected the outcome of the game, but that never happened. The truth is the Magic dominated them during the regular season, and they did it during the playoff's. What caused that? Match-up problems! Not even close. The team chemistry may have been there with this past year's squad, but they didn't have the right players. If they had the right players, they would not have had the match-up problems that they did with the Magic and Dwight Howard (hence, why they went and got Shaq - at least until they can grab a better, younger free agent center in 2010).
Again, you have your opinion, I have mine.
You don't happen to live in Cleveland, do you? :):)
No, I don't.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
5,066
Tokens
The Cavs loss went beyond a couple bad breaks.. they have been owned by Orlando whether the regular season or postseason the last few years. Anyone who watched their regular season games last year wouldnt have been shocked that they lost the series even with homecourt, as Orlando provided several matchup problems that destroyed the Cavs. Even if they had drawn the Celtics which would have been a more favorable matchup with KG out, there is no saying they were the best team last year.. they played the Lakers at home on primetime TV in the regular season and lost, so who is to say they would have still won the Finals?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
3,112
Tokens
I'm not saying they would have definitely won the finals, I'm saying they were the best team. Those two things don't necessarily go hand in hand.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
Cavs were not the best team last year. They got there ass spanked twice by LA. Gasol and Odom would have destroyed cavs in the paint like they did in both games last year.

My prediction:

Lakers will sign Odom...

Ariza will either stay in LA or Lakers will sign Artest. Artest would rather play for LA. Better market, LBJ and Shaq might leave after a year, same salary + he is tight with Kobe and Odom.

I think he is staying over Odom's house right now.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Orlando was a bad matchup for CLE and everybody new it. Bad breaks, the Cavs were a lucky shot from being swept.

Jeckll,

Yes, the best team doesn't always win the championship, particularly in the NFL, NCAAF, NCAAB, but in MLB, NHL, NBA, hottest teams combined with the right matchups.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Artest now says he is signing with the Lakers. Bummer. No more rooting for one of my favorites. Lakers are strong as hell for next year.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
Cavs were not the best team last year. They got there ass spanked twice by LA. Gasol and Odom would have destroyed cavs in the paint like they did in both games last year.

My prediction:

Lakers will sign Odom...

Ariza will either stay in LA or Lakers will sign Artest. Artest would rather play for LA. Better market, LBJ and Shaq might leave after a year, same salary + he is tight with Kobe and Odom.

I think he is staying over Odom's house right now.


I am 2 nasty... whoooot.....
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 10, 2002
Messages
8,483
Tokens
Just need Lamar to sign and Lakers will be the fav's for the next few years...
 

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
4,223
Tokens
yep Odom as the sixth man...I mean shit I think Artest is locked up now for another 3 years....They may win 4 in a row...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,875
Messages
13,574,518
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com