I love the move Rounders but a couple things about it are so ridiculous

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
what do people think KGB has in the last hand of the movie where he gets stacked? he does tell mike "go away this one not good for you" so he has to have a set of 10's NO? the board was 6710 and mikey held the 89 the board rolled out super dry so 89 was the only hand that could be kgb in that spot...its basically a replica of the 1st hand except for the quad 9s that could have beat kgb

Me and my buddies have had this discussion. I think he had AA.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
The amount of money they have on the table in the Chan scene is flawed. Also no chance Chan lays down his hand in a limit game. He would have at least seen a flop.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
Watched the movie on Netflix last night, haven't seen it in a few years. A few absurd things.....

1. How Matt Damon calls what every single guy is holding in the Judges office just by watching the cards and their eyes. I don't mean he just knew someone had a big hand and another was bluffing. He literally knew exactly what each was holding somehow....

2. In the two pivotal hands of the movie (in the first scene and the very last), any poker player in the world would have lost it all on the first hand with a full house and won it all on the last hand after flopping the nuts heads up. It has nothing to do with Matt Damons character being an amazing poker player on those hands.


Like I said great movie and a classic, but those two things are comical


Think so?

In the first hand, the pot was $3k before KGB made a $15k bet after the river. That's a hell of an overbet which would give even the world's best poker players a moment of pause. With Mike's A9 of clubs, KGB couldn't have had pocket 9s. The only hand that can beat Mike is pocket aces, which is exactly what he lost with. And that was the whole point of the fist 15 mins of the movie you may have missed...as long as your opponent has outs, it's not a good idea to risk your entire bankroll.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
222
Tokens
jc just like i remember

bait then argue
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
20,483
Tokens
Think so?

In the first hand, the pot was $3k before KGB made a $15k bet after the river. That's a hell of an overbet which would give even the world's best poker players a moment of pause. With Mike's A9 of clubs, KGB couldn't have had pocket 9s. The only hand that can beat Mike is pocket aces, which is exactly what he lost with. And that was the whole point of the fist 15 mins of the movie you may have missed...as long as your opponent has outs, it's not a good idea to risk your entire bankroll.

Solid points
 

Member
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
31,627
Tokens
fun movie, if you analyze it there are many inconsistencies
turturro and malcavitch were great
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,410
Messages
13,459,645
Members
99,473
Latest member
mrsanchy5
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com