I have given you a +1221 odds winner, now I will give more winners.

[RunMaker 0]

Sakers, -185 WIN , 79-66
KB Stars, -390 WIN , 79-72
Williams -2.5, -160 WIN , 13-9
Djokovic -4.5, +100 WIN , 25-16
Patriots -2.5, +110 WIN , 28-24


100 pays 1221.01




1-0
+12.21

 

[Jstack34 0]

????

 

[CHOPTALK 0]

It's time for this clowns act to get thrown out the offshore forum.

Only justin cruise has earned the right to post plays in the offshore

 

[RunMaker 0]

I'm going to have to do some research on this JC guy, Chop.

In the meantime, per these excellent moderators in Clause V of Section XIV:

"If a poster can post a winner of greater than +1200 odds, he is entitled to make a thread that will post winners. Said poster must attain at least a 55.07% winning percentage and generate a corresponding return that is indicative of -110 odds. For example, 56-44, +7.60 (-110 odds or better). Said poster is granted a four-month trial to achieve this. If said poster does not achieve this, he will have to get a sex change like Bruce Jenner and Bob Costas have done."

 

[Greenbacks 0]

You didn`t bet that parlay?

 

[CHOPTALK 0]

I'm going to have to do some research on this JC guy, Chop.

In the meantime, per these excellent moderators in Clause V of Section XIV:

"If a poster can post a winner of greater than +1200 odds, he is entitled to make a thread that will post winners. Said poster must attain at least a 55.07% winning percentage and generate a corresponding return that is indicative of -110 odds. For example, 56-44, +7.60 (-110 odds or better). Said poster is granted a four-month trial to achieve this. If said poster does not achieve this, he will have to get a sex change like Bruce Jenner and Bob Costas have done."

ok let him stay

 

[pocketrockets 0]

fuckin attention whorin bs

 

[sharky99 0]

lol funny Slapping-silly90))

 

[RunMaker 0]

Nah, Green, I didn't bet it. I burned out my accounts. But I posted it before all the games. And now by the grace of Satan I will pick more winners for you.

 

[bukis1 0]

Would have lost if you played it lol

 

[slapshot 0]

you need a avatar maybe you will like this one :think2:

 

[RunMaker 0]

Would have lost if you played it lol

This is the absolute gambler's truth, my friend. Aint no doubt about it!

 

[bukis1 0]

I know the feeling

 

[RunMaker 0]

Mon 2/2	3031	Seoul SK Knights		-2 -106	-126	Over 153.5 -112
02:00 AM	3032	Changwon LG Sakers		+2 -104	+114	Under 153.5 +102

<tbody>
</tbody>

Here we go. UNDER 153.5, +102.

Tough spot here, no? Seoul is the #1 team in the league and they give up the fewest points. Sakers are the hottest team in the league (10-0, 9-1 ATS last 10) and they score the most points.

Under has won in 11 of last 14 games for Seoul. Under is 3-0 for last 3 games for the Sakers. They went on that extended over run winning about 80% of the overs in a 20-game span, but that run has come to an end and is trending down. They just can't meet the escalated totals and these will start to gravitate down. This is the first real total where it's scaled down for a while for the Sakers. That being said, it's still very high. And they're getting the best defense in the league.

 

[RunMaker 0]

Mon 2/2	3031	Seoul SK Knights		-2 -106	-126	Over 153.5 -112
02:00 AM	3032	Changwon LG Sakers		+2 -104	+114	Under 153.5 +102

<tbody>
</tbody>

Here we go. UNDER 153.5, +102.

Tough spot here, no? Seoul is the #1 team in the league and they give up the fewest points. Sakers are the hottest team in the league (10-0, 9-1 ATS last 10) and they score the most points.

95-71 Sakers.
Had 39 to spare going into the 4th so had a decent shot, but they blew up for 52 points. Problem was not going with the obvious, the Sakers 10-0 and 9-1 ATS in their last 10. But didn't think that would continue against the #1 team on the road. However, they simply cannot be stopped.


1-1
+11.21

 

[GoBlue34 0]

2 team NCAAF parlay

UK +14.5 (-180)
Notre Dame -16.5 (-120)

Thanks for this play too Cruise. JC also used to post his record at the bottom just like Run does.

Same homo...

 

[CHOPTALK 0]

I will ban myself for life if it's found out this guy is JC

 

[RunMaker 0]

Atlanta trailing 55-42 at HT.


ATL -4.0 2nd half, -150

 

[MikeB 0]

I'm going to have to do some research on this JC guy, Chop.

In the meantime, per these excellent moderators in Clause V of Section XIV:

"If a poster can post a winner of greater than +1200 odds, he is entitled to make a thread that will post winners. Said poster must attain at least a 55.07% winning percentage and generate a corresponding return that is indicative of -110 odds. For example, 56-44, +7.60 (-110 odds or better). Said poster is granted a four-month trial to achieve this. If said poster does not achieve this, he will have to get a sex change like Bruce Jenner and Bob Costas have done."

Haha

 

[tnvolfan 0]

fuckin attention whorin bs

I fukn hate attn whores....................