This is the wager.
[15104] NEW ENGLAND WONT WIN IN OT -1700 (NEW ENGLAND WIN IN OVERTIME vrs NEW ENGLAND WONT WIN IN OT
When I made this wager, my thinking was I win this wager 3 ways.
1> New York Giants in in regulation
2> New York Giants win in overtime
3> New England win in regulation
Bookmaker thinks that since New England did not win, it is no action.
At the very least, it is not clear, and this should be graded a win. There was no stipulation that the Patriots had to win.
Who is right?
[15104] NEW ENGLAND WONT WIN IN OT -1700 (NEW ENGLAND WIN IN OVERTIME vrs NEW ENGLAND WONT WIN IN OT
When I made this wager, my thinking was I win this wager 3 ways.
1> New York Giants in in regulation
2> New York Giants win in overtime
3> New England win in regulation
Bookmaker thinks that since New England did not win, it is no action.
At the very least, it is not clear, and this should be graded a win. There was no stipulation that the Patriots had to win.
Who is right?