I believe if Rafael (Ted) Cruz and Carly Fiorina were the Republican Presidential candidates they can win big time caz

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
both of them are not wimpy Republicans and they know a bunch of stuff.

When they go up those crafty sound bites democrates, with that war on women crap

and other liberal bullshit nonsense, the American people will see the light, the real ones,

not the ones who vote democratic to continue to get free stuff for their vote, Teddy and

Carly will win IMO!

 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,314
Tokens
HOUSTON, Texas — U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, issued the following statement today in support of Governor Mike Pence’s effort to defend religious liberty and protect against the government forcing individuals to violate their deeply held beliefs:

“I want to commend Governor Mike Pence for his support of religious freedom, especially in the face of fierce opposition. There was a time, not too long ago, when defending religious liberty enjoyed strong bipartisan support. Alas, today we are facing a concerted assault on the First Amendment, on the right of every American to seek out and worship God according to the dictates of his or her conscience. Governor Pence is holding the line to protect religious liberty in the Hoosier State. Indiana is giving voice to millions of courageous conservatives across this country who are deeply concerned about the ongoing attacks upon our personal liberties. I’m proud to stand with Mike, and I urge Americans to do the same.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Way past time to stand up to the PC crowd.

Ted Cruz is a conservative rock.

Once he's on the debate stage, he will bury all the squishy RINOs.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
HOUSTON, Texas — U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, issued the following statement today in support of Governor Mike Pence’s effort to defend religious liberty and protect against the government forcing individuals to violate their deeply held beliefs:

“I want to commend Governor Mike Pence for his support of religious freedom, especially in the face of fierce opposition. There was a time, not too long ago, when defending religious liberty enjoyed strong bipartisan support. Alas, today we are facing a concerted assault on the First Amendment, on the right of every American to seek out and worship God according to the dictates of his or her conscience. Governor Pence is holding the line to protect religious liberty in the Hoosier State. Indiana is giving voice to millions of courageous conservatives across this country who are deeply concerned about the ongoing attacks upon our personal liberties. I’m proud to stand with Mike, and I urge Americans to do the same.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Way past time to stand up to the PC crowd.

Ted Cruz is a conservative rock.

Once he's on the debate stage, he will bury all the squishy RINOs.

Cruz's biggest problem is people think he is a nut job.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
Pretty solid rant on what the problem is with the GOP elites:

https://storify.com/drawandstrike/we-re-almost-there-in-taking-over-the-gop-from-bot

The guy makes a good point, though...Boehner and McConnell basically have dimocraps shielding them from angry conservatives. Sign of progress? I hope so.

This is why I have said repeatedly that Ted Cruz is fighting two parties, one of which is his own. If he wins the nomination, he wins the election. It's a shame the GOPe will be fighting against that tooth and nail.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Cruz's biggest problem is people know he is a nut job.

FYP. Figures Cruz, and the sick Casper, would be for Pence's disgusting law trying to legalize discrimination in Indiana. Just another example why Cruz(and Pence) are not fit to hold higher office in America. Cuba maybe for Cruz. He'd be comfortable in a totalitarian state.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,314
Tokens
FYP. Figures Cruz, and the sick Casper, would be for Pence's disgusting law trying to legalize discrimination in Indiana. Just another example why Cruz(and Pence) are not fit to hold higher office in America. Cuba maybe for Cruz. He'd be comfortable in a totalitarian state.

Figures a commie like you would be as anti-First Amendment as Fidel Castro.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,956
Tokens
FYP. Figures Cruz, and the sick Casper, would be for Pence's disgusting law trying to legalize discrimination in Indiana. Just another example why Cruz(and Pence) are not fit to hold higher office in America. Cuba maybe for Cruz. He'd be comfortable in a totalitarian state.
Yeah, he should be telling Chick-fil-A not to come to Indiana, exactly the way the mayor of Boston did a couple years ago.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Pretty solid rant on what the problem is with the GOP elites:

https://storify.com/drawandstrike/we-re-almost-there-in-taking-over-the-gop-from-bot

The guy makes a good point, though...Boehner and McConnell basically have dimocraps shielding them from angry conservatives. Sign of progress? I hope so.

This is why I have said repeatedly that Ted Cruz is fighting two parties, one of which is his own. If he wins the nomination, he wins the election. It's a shame the GOPe will be fighting against that tooth and nail.

Of course you don't REALLY believe this nonsense, otherwise you'd be more than willing to take my bet heavily weighted in your favor.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
FYP. Figures Cruz, and the sick Casper, would be for Pence's disgusting law trying to legalize discrimination in Indiana. Just another example why Cruz(and Pence) are not fit to hold higher office in America. Cuba maybe for Cruz. He'd be comfortable in a totalitarian state.


Assuming you're finished playing with your wrestling dolls for the night, please explain which state or federal law prohibits businesses from turning away customers. Then feel free to explain how this is any different than the law which Slick Willie signed in 1993. Duly noted that you think he's a bigot.

I think I'll go to bed and wake up to your flailing with some morning coffee.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
Of course you don't REALLY believe this nonsense, otherwise you'd be more than willing to take my bet heavily weighted in your favor.

I'll type this slowly for you:

Are...you...fucking...dense?

I've told you and the forum roughly a dozen times why Ted Cruz will have a great deal of trouble winning the R nomination. It has absolutely zero to do with his polling numbers or popularity.

If his own party wasn't standing in his way, his chances of winning would be much greater. How exactly can I make that any clearer to you?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Assuming you're finished playing with your wrestling dolls for the night, please explain which state or federal law prohibits businesses from turning away customers. Then feel free to explain how this is any different than the law which Slick Willie signed in 1993. Duly noted that you think he's a bigot.

I think I'll go to bed and wake up to your flailing with some morning coffee.

1993 was 22 years ago and Clinton was wrong and has changed, as has much of America on that topic, thankfully. Too bad Pence and his ilk isn't part of that change.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
I'll type this slowly for you:

Are...you...fucking...dense?

I've told you and the forum roughly a dozen times why Ted Cruz will have a great deal of trouble winning the R nomination. It has absolutely zero to do with his polling numbers or popularity.

If his own party wasn't standing in his way, his chances of winning would be much greater. How exactly can I make that any clearer to you?

Of course you don't REALLY believe this nonsense, otherwise you'd be more than willing to take my bet heavily weighted in your favor. If the only thing separating Cruz from the Presidency was the R nomination, he'd simply run as an Independent, and get ready to be sworn in on Jan 21st 2017 for the landslide that awaits him. :ohno: You really are an idiot, as if we didn't know it already when you posted Humans have only been on earth for about 2000 years.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,956
Tokens
Of course that was just an opinion by Menino, not legalizing discrimination by law, as Pence's law is doing. http://gawker.com/5929429/boston-mayor-wont-stop-chick-fil-a-from-opening-branch-in-beantown
Funny, that's not what the letter the mayor wrote to Chick-fil-A actually said: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...oston-mayor-chick-fil-a-letter_n_1703770.html

let's be honest about what this is really about, Democrats trying to take away the rights of non-Democrats. If an evangelical Christian wanted to open a church and a Strip mall that was owned by gays, a church where they would preach against abortion, homosexuality, and perform exorcisms regularly, and the property owners didn't want to lease the land, Democrats wouldn't care, because in their mind, those people don't have rights.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Funny, that's not what the letter the mayor wrote to Chick-fil-A actually said: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...oston-mayor-chick-fil-a-letter_n_1703770.html

let's be honest about what this is really about, Democrats trying to take away the rights of non-Democrats. If an evangelical Christian wanted to open a church and a Strip mall that was owned by gays, a church where they would preach against abortion, homosexuality, and perform exorcisms regularly, and the property owners didn't want to lease the land, Democrats wouldn't care, because in their mind, those people don't have rights.

If we're Going to be "honest" about what this is about, it's about Religious Nuts trying to expand their influence and discriminate against those that don't share their views. Democrats?? This nonsense is being proposed and passed by Republicans.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,956
Tokens
If we're Going to be "honest" about what this is about, it's about Religious Nuts trying to expand their influence and discriminate against those that don't share their views. Democrats?? This nonsense is being proposed and passed by Republicans.
Not serving those that have lifestyles they find immoral is no where near as bad as wanting to hurt people who don't share their views, which is exactly what the democrats are trying to do. Again, the democrats have no problem with discrimination, as long as they're not the ones being discriminated against.

I love how the link you posted showed the mayor of Chicago was totally fine with using the government to keep Chick-fil-A out of Chicago.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Not serving those that have lifestyles they find immoral is no where near as bad as wanting to hurt people who don't share their views, which is exactly what the democrats are trying to do. Again, the democrats have no problem with discrimination, as long as they're not the ones being discriminated against.

I love how the link you posted showed the mayor of Chicago was totally fine with using the government to keep Chick-fil-A out of Chicago.

Democrats have Nothing to do with this bill. What are you talking about? It's amusing that you are trying to paint this discrimination law on Democrats, when Pence is a Republican Conservative.
The Mayor of Chicago did not pass any law that forbids Chick Filet from entering Chicago. He just gave his view that what they do is wrong and he is entitled to that view.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
[h=1]Editorial: Gov. Pence, fix 'religious freedom' law now[/h]12:12 a.m. EDT March 31, 2015
635633567670670959-G9DACF488.1.jpg

(Photo: Indy Star)


9311 CONNECT 1375 TWEET 1 LINKEDIN 406 COMMENTEMAILMORE

We are at a critical moment in Indiana's history.
And much is at stake.
Our image. Our reputation as a state that embraces people of diverse backgrounds and makes them feel welcome. And our efforts over many years to retool our economy, to attract talented workers and thriving businesses, and to improve the quality of life for millions of Hoosiers.
All of this is at risk because of a new law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, that no matter its original intent already has done enormous harm to our state and potentially our economic future.
The consequences will only get worse if our state leaders delay in fixing the deep mess created.

Half steps will not be enough. Half steps will not undo the damage.



INDIANAPOLIS STAR
Here it is: The text of Indiana's ‘religious freedom’ law




Only bold action — action that sends an unmistakable message to the world that our state will not tolerate discrimination against any of its citizens — will be enough to reverse the damage.

Gov. Mike Pence and the General Assembly need to enact a state law to prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, education and public accommodations on the basis of a person's sexual orientation or gender identity.

Those protections and RFRA can co-exist. They do elsewhere.
Laws protecting sexual orientation and gender identity are not foreign to Indiana.
Indianapolis, for example, has had those legal protections in place for nearly a decade. Indy's law applies to businesses with more than six employees, and exempts religious organizations and non-profit groups.
The city's human rights ordinance provides strong legal protection — and peace of mind —for LGBT citizens; yet, it has not placed an undue burden on businesses.
Importantly, passage of a state human rights law would send a clear message that Indiana will not tolerate discrimination. It's crucial for that message to be communicated widely.

INDIANAPOLIS STAR
Ballard, council to legislature: Repeal law, protect LGBT from discrimination




On a practical level, by basing the state law on a 10-year-old ordinance, the General Assembly could move quickly to adopt the measure without fear of unintended consequences. If lawmakers can't act in the next month, the governor should call a special session immediately after the regular session ends in April to take up human rights legislation.
Why not simply repeal RFRA? First, it appears to be politically unacceptable for the governor and many Republican lawmakers.
Second, there are Hoosiers who support RFRA out of a genuine desire to protect religious freedom. To safeguard that essential freedom, 19 states and the federal government have adopted RFRA laws, largely without controversy. But states like Illinois not only protect religious freedom through RFRA but also provide gay and lesbian residents with protected legal status.
Third, repeal might get rid of the heat but it would not do what is most important – to move the state forward.
We urge Gov. Pence and lawmakers to stop clinging to arguments about whether RFRA really does what critics fear; to stop clinging to ideology or personal preferences; to focus instead on fixing this.

Governor, Indiana is in a state of crisis. It is worse than you seem to understand.
You must act with courage and wisdom. You must lead us forward now. You must ensure that all Hoosiers have strong protections against discrimination.
The laws can co-exist. And so can we.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,956
Tokens
Democrats have Nothing to do with this bill. What are you talking about? It's amusing that you are trying to paint this discrimination law on Democrats, when Pence is a Republican Conservative.
The Mayor of Chicago did not pass any law that forbids Chick Filet from entering Chicago. He just gave his view that what they do is wrong and he is entitled to that view.
Democrats want to repeal the law so that they can hurt people that don't act the way Democrats think they should act.

[FONT=Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif]"After a local alderman expressed his intent to block a second franchise from opening in his ward, Emanuel appeared to support the effort, remarking that "Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values."

everybody knows that the left should be rioting if a Republican governor or mayor tried to stop a gay friendly business from opening, like the like the alderman in Chicago.[/FONT]
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Democrats want to repeal the law so that they can hurt people that don't act the way Democrats think they should act.

"After a local alderman expressed his intent to block a second franchise from opening in his ward, Emanuel appeared to support the effort, remarking that "Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values."

everybody knows that the left should be rioting if a Republican governor or mayor tried to stop a gay friendly business from opening, like the like the alderman in Chicago.

My G-d. Emanuel did not pass a law that supported discrimination, he gave his opinion. Please show me the law Rahm Emanuel passed barring Chick Filet from opening in Chicago and I'll blast that also. Only problem is, he didn't.
Pence did. The law Pence passed legalizes discrimination. That's why he refused to answer Stephanopolis's question. "Pence did not answer directly when asked at least six times whether under the law it would be legal for a merchant to refuse to serve gay customers"
That's why there's an outcry against it from Businesses everywhere, in Indiana and out, as there should be.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,790
Messages
13,573,054
Members
100,866
Latest member
tt88myy
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com