Howard Stern not worried about subpoenas - ?? For Shrink

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
86
Tokens
Shrink have you heard which portals was subpoened? This article says they are casting a "wide net".



Missouri Subpoenas a Cause for Concern
by Kevin Smith

Lawyers and industry observers believe a federal investigation into I-gaming advertising practices is cause for concern.

The scope of the investigation remains unknown, but the consensus is that a broad net has been cast.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This is the first time we have seen the federal government go after advertisers using the aiding and abetting clause. That is very significant."
- Lawrence Walters
Weston, Garrou & DeWitt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Interactive Gaming News on Tuesday obtained a copy of a subpoena issued to a portal owner who accepts advertising for online casinos and sports books.

The subpoena, issued by the United States District Court in the Eastern District of Missouri, asks the operator to turn over all commercial and financial information from Jan. 1, 1997 to the present related to the advertisement of online casinos and sports books.

Among information requested in the subpoena is all the "names and all identifying and contact information you have for every point of contact for each such gambling advertiser."

The subpoena also calls for the turning over of any information about advertisements placed on TV, radio or cablecasts. The court, through the subpoena, asks for any accounting records including accounts receivable or accounts payable. They also ask the portal to turn over records of sales calls, telephone records, contracts, invoices, records of negotiations pertaining to payment, e-mail correspondence (both incoming and outgoing), financial transactions, annual gross revenue for the site, information on how advertising revenue was received and the names of financial institutions and account numbers pertaining to the business.

Lawrence Walters, a lawyer with expertise in advertising law, said the subpoena should send up a red flag to those in the industry.

"This is a big deal," he said. "This is going to cause some ripples. This is the first time we have seen the federal government go after advertisers using the aiding and abetting clause. That is very significant."

It's the first time such an investigation has taken place, but not the first time the Eastern District of Missouri has targeted the online gaming industry. Raymond W. Gruender, the U.S. Attorney in the district, reached a $10 million settlement with PayPal Inc. in July following an investigation into the alternative payment solution provider's involvement with the interactive gaming industry. Gruender argued the company was in violation of federal law and aided in illegal activities by providing its service to online sports books and casinos.

"You have to wonder if this guy has an axe to grind against the industry," said a lawyer who represents interactive gaming parties, but requested anonymity.

Meanwhile, Gruender was nominated this week for a seat on the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. If confirmed, he would succeed Judge Pasco M. Bowman II of Kansas City, who took senior status. The nomination process could take six months to a year.

The subpoena calls for the party to testify to the grand jury Oct. 29, but one legal expert pointed out that the subpoena is aimed at getting as much information as possible through documentation and not testimony.

"Document subpoenas, which is what we have in this case, are pretty standard," the source said. "They are just trying to get as much information as they can to determine what direction the investigation will take next."

The uncertainty has many in the industry on edge, but at least one major broadcaster that runs online gambling ads isn't concerned. A spokesperson with the Howard Stern Radio show, one of the highest rated syndicated programs in the United States, said they haven't been served any subpoenas and aren't worried about it. The program is aired by Infinity Broadcasting and one if its sponsors is GoldenPalace.com.

"This cleared all the proper channels through the Infinity legal department," the spokeswoman said. "We only advertise the free part of the site and we are following all the rules."

The news of the grand jury came one day before the Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York announced a deal with online sports book BetOnSports.com to place advertisements on 250 New York City buses with the BOS logo and the company's toll-free wagering hotline.

Walters is concerned that an investigation could be centered on advertising rights for companies. He said it would mark the first time advertising for a certain industry has been singled out as off-limits to radio stations, newspapers and Web sites.

"This is probably just a scare tactic, but the government likes to take on issues, and if they feel strongly enough about it, they could create some problems," Walters said. "For them to single out online gaming advertising is unheard of, but the Department of Justice is unfriendly to First Amendment interests and there are significant constitutional rights at stake here."
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
179
Tokens
This has nothing to do with Howard, he isnt in any trouble. If any kind of worry it would be on the company, not him.

He does and has advertised for quite a few books, such as Golden Palace, Bet on Sports etc.

Love Howard..good show today!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
86
Tokens
Zero effect? Do you think Shrink knows any of the real names of sportsbooks owned by US citizens?

Your definition of zero might change if he was served and was legally required to start naming names or face federal contempt charges.

Get real.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,120
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Lester:
Zero effect? Do you think Shrink knows any of the real names of sportsbooks owned by US citizens?

Your definition of zero might change if he was served and was legally required to start naming names or face federal contempt charges.

Get real.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You get REAL.........Do you really think the RX has the TRUE names........PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,120
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Lester:
The answer to your question is yes. Don't be so naive.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Lester, Lester, you are the NAIVE one. To you HONESTLY beleive the FEDS dont already know the names of the MAJOR PLAYERS in the INDUSTRY?

Hey got some Ocean front property in Colorado Ill let ya have cheap....

Get real Amigo
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
86
Tokens
If they already know then why the subpoenas and why isn't everyone in jail? Does anyone other than Sr Muny have any info they would like to share on this?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,194
Tokens
Shrink gets a subpoena to appear in court to give "insider" information about sportsbooks.


yes +15000

no -20000
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
516
Tokens
Lester,
Major is trying to blow up a story because he's in Canada and is, well.....clueless. He thinks he stumbled on a gold mine assuming all the web sites will die and leave him standing alone. Major doesn't know squat about gaming or the law (except to run from it).

Those that only have web sites as their ad revenue from books are safe as long as they don't take a piece of the action.


Major should do some homework or spend a couple bucks before he spews more garbage.

Just another reason why Major Wager is a place for SUCKERS!
 

Old Fart
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,395
Tokens
Is a US race car a portal? A sportsbook in another country (think it's Sportsbook.com) is advertising on the side of a race car--I think being driven in the US.

What's funny to me here is that the country which champions Captailism--is scared of advertising!! A real joke.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
516
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Lester:
they are after owners not the portals.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

but the portals who take print, wire ads and/or % of from books are violating the law. They're forced to comply or face possible indictments themsleves.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
86
Tokens
Shrink do you know anything about this? If you were subpoened would you fight it with all your high power legal talent or would you sing like a songbird?

What about what JJGold says about you are you under investigation?
 

jam

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
537
Tokens
I'm sure he has other things to worry about, like what to do when half the sites you see in the banner ads at the top of this page are gone in two years.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Another day, another poster who knows nothing about the law spreading lies. Where is it written that advertising by offshore sportsbooks is illegal. I dealt with this yesterday, there is no federal law against sports betting, but the Feds hate it so they shake up the bird cage hoping to scare people off. It might have worked in the past, but it won't now because these advertisers are huge bucks. Freedom of speech still is around after all and advertising an activity that is legal in some jurisdictions isn't against the law.
 

Old Fart
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,395
Tokens
I learnt all my legal background from The Juice and I'll tell ya--Wild Bill is right .
If it don't fit--you must acquit!
icon_biggrin.gif
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Lester,

The people that I know who sing like canaries are often canaries themselves...

I would fight this to the very end with a lot of confidence in our legal team...

Like WildBill said, it is perfectly LEGAL to accept advertising from offshore sports books.

THE SHRINK
 

Old Fart
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,395
Tokens
I can only draw one conclusion, from Wild Bill's and The Shrink's remarks: The US Dept of Justice must be bored. Nothing to do. What a shame to put innocent folks through an ordeal to satisfy their "power cravings".
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Its how these legal guys get on the list of nominees in the Bush courts, it proves their "conservative" credentials.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,983
Messages
13,575,755
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com