Since you don't have the ability to recognize a good legal argument from a bad one, why are you posting?
Name the wager you would like to place on Trump being indicted.
Name it, you loud mouthed pansy.
And, who DOES "...have the ability to recognize a good legal argument from a bad one," YOU???? ROTFLMAO!!!!! YOU'RE the fucking mongoloid who brightly chirped, "Gee, if Mueller has enough evidence to indict Flynn right NOW, then, why doesn't he indict him, then(not long before Mueller did exactly that). So, YOUR considered opinion is superior to Starr's, huh? You really ARE a fucking moron, aren't you?
As I've said, there are numerous ways for Twittler to leave office besides indictment, asshole-Nixon wasn't indicted, either, but we found out after the fact that he was an un-indicted co-conspirator, so under YOUR stupid fucking proposal, you would "win" that bet. No thanks, chump, I'll make the same offer to YOU that I made to those other brainless schmucks, Gas Bag and NFL Turds: he won't be President come 1/20/20. Loser is gone forever. Bet, Sap Sucker?