So true, but that's how idiots roll
LOL
QFT
should we be laughing or crying?
I love how she's so indignant about releasing the evidence now and complaining about the timing of such when she did everything possible to conceal the evidence and delay the timing. She represents her ilk well, just fucking idiots from top to bottom, and she knows her flock will swallow whole without reflex. If it wasn't for LOSER NATION, we wouldn't have the political environment we have today. They are the enablers.
It's bad.
The NYPD was originally conducting the Weiner investigation, not the FBI. This is an important point for the fact that the NYPD felt compelled to turn over whatever damning evidence they found to the FBI.
We can speculate till the cows come home... Huma as a secret Muslim agent sharing classified info? Wouldn't surprise me.
Either way, it appears the election is the LEAST of The Crooked Cackling C*nt's worries going forward.
I have no idea why Comey is doing this. I have no idea whatIt's bad.
The NYPD was originally conducting the Weiner investigation, not the FBI. This is an important point for the fact that the NYPD felt compelled to turn over whatever damning evidence they found to the FBI.
We can speculate till the cows come home... Huma as a secret Muslim agent sharing classified info? Wouldn't surprise me.
Either way, it appears the election is the LEAST of The Crooked Cackling C*nt's worries going forward.
the connection between Weiner and Clinton could be. I'm more
interested in the next Wikileaks dump because we'll be able
to see them.
[h=2]Attorney General tried to stop FBI director James Comey sending letter to Congress revealing bureau had reopened the investigation into Hillary's emails because it 'could influence election'[/h][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]Attorney General Loretta Lynch advised FBI Director James Comey against sending a letter to Congress to inform them about the reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server. Lynch argued to Comey that he should follow the Justice Department's practice of not taking actions that could influence the outcome of a presidential election, The New Yorker reported on Saturday. The FBI director is an employee of the Justice Department and is 'covered under its policies.' Comey broke from Lynch, who objected to the move, and independently sent the letter to Congress on Friday, dropping the bombshell about the restarted investigation based on newly discovered emails, rocking Clinton's campaign. Comey's supporters argue that he had to break away from Lynch and act independently on the issue due to her compromising herself when she had an impromptu visit with former president Bill Clinton late into the investigation earlier this year.
[h=2]'Oh God, Anthony Weiner! I'm not a big fan': What Joe Biden said when he was told source of messages at center of new FBI probe into Hillary Clinton emails[/h][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][/FONT]Joe Biden says he disliked ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner 'even before he got in trouble' in a number of sex scandals - including the latest one, which is endangering Hillary Clinton's presidential bid. Biden's comments came after revelations Friday that the FBI is still looking at a number of emails related to the Hillary Clinton investigation. The probe was reportedly triggered while the FBI and New York Police Department investigate allegations Weiner was once again sexting. DailyMail.com releaved Weiner may have been sending sexually explicit messages to an underage girl.
[h=2]Huma lies low as Hillary's attack dogs turn on FBI: Clinton's aide nowhere to be seen as Democrats dismiss move to reopen email probe as 'long on innuendo and short on facts'[/h]
Hillary Clinton emerged on Saturday boarding her campaign plane noticeably without her top aide Huma Abedin as her campaign cranked up its war against FBI Director James Comey. On Friday, Comey sent a letter to Congress to inform them about the reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server based on newly discovered emails, rocking Clinton's campaign. Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, teed off on the lawman in a blistering press call on Saturday. He said Comey's move to reexamine Clinton emails was 'long on innuendo and short on facts,' calling the reporting on the stunning developments in the presidential race 'overblowm.'
How Hillary’s lawyers ran roughshod over the FBI
By Paul Sperry
October 18, 2016 | 8:18pm
Last August, FBI officials paid a visit to Hillary Clinton’s lawyers’ office in Washington and begged to see six laptop computers containing the former secretary of state’s classified e-mails. They were told to take a hike, and they did.
Clinton’s lawyers “declined to provide consent” for the bureau to even search the laptops, let alone seize them, claiming they may contain “privileged communications.”
Instead of seeking to subpoena the evidence, the FBI meekly “wished to arrange for secure storage of them in a manner agreeable to both the FBI and the attorneys” — even though the attorneys lacked authorization to handle the material, which included Top Secret information.
While arrogantly stiff-arming the FBI, Clinton’s lawyers “admitted that the e-mails contained on these laptops had been viewed by attorneys who did not have a security clearance at the time,” a newly released FBI report of the incident reveals.
The embarrassing scene, which played out at the law offices of Williams & Connolly, is just one of many examples of how lawyers loyal to Clinton ran roughshod over the FBI investigation.
In the end, investigators were able to see only e-mails from certain dates on laptops owned by top Clinton aides Heather Samuelson and Cheryl Mills, who conducted the e-mail seek-and-destroy mission for Clinton. After the restricted viewing, they had to agree to destroy the evidence as part of outrageous side deals FBI Director James Comey agreed to honor, even after these key witnesses were immunized against prosecution.
Mills and Samuelson are represented by former Justice Department attorney Beth Wilkinson, a longtime Democratic booster. Wilkinson also is defending two other former State Department officials central to the FBI investigation: former deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan and Philippe Reines, who served as Clinton’s spokesman.
Veteran FBI agents say letting one attorney represent four subjects is unheard of in a criminal investigation. The highly unusual arrangement not only allows witnesses the opportunity to share information and corroborate their stories, but it makes it virtually impossible for the FBI to put pressure on one of them to cooperate against the others.
If one of the clients ended up in criminal jeopardy, Wilkinson would never let that client say something adverse about any of her other clients. In effect, Comey let all these important witnesses — Mills, Samuelson, Reines and Sullivan — collude and coordinate their testimony before his agents ever got a crack at them.
Sure enough, partially declassified summaries of their interviews with FBI agents show that all four hewed to the same unbelievable line that they did not know their boss had a private e-mail address hosted on a private server until they heard about it in the news.
A cabal of lawyers also arranged a joint defense for Clinton inside State after she left and as Congress sought her e-mails in the Benghazi investigation.
An FBI staffer believed the State Department was shielding Clinton.
“[Redacted] believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON emails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON,” FBI notes read.
According to interview summaries from the FBI, staffers came under “immense pressure to review quickly and not label anything as classified.”
The team normally responsible for determining which records should be kept secret said lawyers “conducted their own review” of Clinton’s e-mails — and did not consult with the CIA and FBI but with lawyers at the White House and Justice Department.
The team “felt intimidated when they used or suggested the use of the [classified] exemption on any of the 296 [Benghazi] e-mails,” according to “302” interview notes.
State lawyers gave a thumb drive containing the archive of Clinton’s e-mails to her lawyers at Williams & Connolly, but would not provide copies to the State Department’s own inspector general or to diplomatic-security officials, even though they requested them.
Career bureaucrats “were suspicious” of the lawyers John Kerry tapped to deal with congressional committees seeking Clinton e-mails, because some of them previously worked for entities that “appeared to create a conflict of interest,” the FBI said.
The names of those entities were redacted, and are among the more than 4,500 redactions in the 350 pages of documents released in the FBI investigation.
Comey has testified that he could find no evidence of ill intent by Clinton and her minions in his year-long probe of her e-mails. But his own FBI staffers complained that State officials pressured them to downgrade the classification of Clinton e-mails, even offering a “quid pro quo.” If that’s not ill-intent, what is?
By Paul Sperry
October 18, 2016 | 8:18pm
Last August, FBI officials paid a visit to Hillary Clinton’s lawyers’ office in Washington and begged to see six laptop computers containing the former secretary of state’s classified e-mails. They were told to take a hike, and they did.
Clinton’s lawyers “declined to provide consent” for the bureau to even search the laptops, let alone seize them, claiming they may contain “privileged communications.”
Instead of seeking to subpoena the evidence, the FBI meekly “wished to arrange for secure storage of them in a manner agreeable to both the FBI and the attorneys” — even though the attorneys lacked authorization to handle the material, which included Top Secret information.
While arrogantly stiff-arming the FBI, Clinton’s lawyers “admitted that the e-mails contained on these laptops had been viewed by attorneys who did not have a security clearance at the time,” a newly released FBI report of the incident reveals.
The embarrassing scene, which played out at the law offices of Williams & Connolly, is just one of many examples of how lawyers loyal to Clinton ran roughshod over the FBI investigation.
In the end, investigators were able to see only e-mails from certain dates on laptops owned by top Clinton aides Heather Samuelson and Cheryl Mills, who conducted the e-mail seek-and-destroy mission for Clinton. After the restricted viewing, they had to agree to destroy the evidence as part of outrageous side deals FBI Director James Comey agreed to honor, even after these key witnesses were immunized against prosecution.
Mills and Samuelson are represented by former Justice Department attorney Beth Wilkinson, a longtime Democratic booster. Wilkinson also is defending two other former State Department officials central to the FBI investigation: former deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan and Philippe Reines, who served as Clinton’s spokesman.
Veteran FBI agents say letting one attorney represent four subjects is unheard of in a criminal investigation. The highly unusual arrangement not only allows witnesses the opportunity to share information and corroborate their stories, but it makes it virtually impossible for the FBI to put pressure on one of them to cooperate against the others.
If one of the clients ended up in criminal jeopardy, Wilkinson would never let that client say something adverse about any of her other clients. In effect, Comey let all these important witnesses — Mills, Samuelson, Reines and Sullivan — collude and coordinate their testimony before his agents ever got a crack at them.
Sure enough, partially declassified summaries of their interviews with FBI agents show that all four hewed to the same unbelievable line that they did not know their boss had a private e-mail address hosted on a private server until they heard about it in the news.
A cabal of lawyers also arranged a joint defense for Clinton inside State after she left and as Congress sought her e-mails in the Benghazi investigation.
An FBI staffer believed the State Department was shielding Clinton.
“[Redacted] believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON emails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON,” FBI notes read.
According to interview summaries from the FBI, staffers came under “immense pressure to review quickly and not label anything as classified.”
The team normally responsible for determining which records should be kept secret said lawyers “conducted their own review” of Clinton’s e-mails — and did not consult with the CIA and FBI but with lawyers at the White House and Justice Department.
The team “felt intimidated when they used or suggested the use of the [classified] exemption on any of the 296 [Benghazi] e-mails,” according to “302” interview notes.
State lawyers gave a thumb drive containing the archive of Clinton’s e-mails to her lawyers at Williams & Connolly, but would not provide copies to the State Department’s own inspector general or to diplomatic-security officials, even though they requested them.
Career bureaucrats “were suspicious” of the lawyers John Kerry tapped to deal with congressional committees seeking Clinton e-mails, because some of them previously worked for entities that “appeared to create a conflict of interest,” the FBI said.
The names of those entities were redacted, and are among the more than 4,500 redactions in the 350 pages of documents released in the FBI investigation.
Comey has testified that he could find no evidence of ill intent by Clinton and her minions in his year-long probe of her e-mails. But his own FBI staffers complained that State officials pressured them to downgrade the classification of Clinton e-mails, even offering a “quid pro quo.” If that’s not ill-intent, what is?
no shit,the audacity of the fucking idiots, just worthless scum
hopefully we learn something like they found the smoking gun, an e-mail chain deleted by the criminals but they forgot about Weiner's machines
priceless
