Hillary Blames Everyone but Herself for Her Loss

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,874
Tokens
This article is incredible. On top of being a nasty person, she has zero introspective qualities.

Her aides took the browbeating — one of several she delivered in person and on the phone that day — in silence. They had a lot of their own thoughts on what went wrong, some of which echoed Hillary’s assessment: her message was off for Michigan, and she had refused to go hard against trade; Mook had pinched pennies and failed to put organizers on the ground; the polling and analytics were a touch too rosy, meaning the campaign didn’t know Bernie was ahead; she had set up an ambiguous decision making structure on the campaign; and she’d focused too heavily on black and brown voters at the expense of competing for the whites who had formed her base in 2008. The list went on and on.

Months earlier, Hillary Clinton turned her fury on her consultants and campaign aides, blaming them for a failure to focus the media on her platform.

In her ear the whole time, spurring her on to cast blame on others and never admit to anything, was her husband. Neither Clinton could accept the simple fact that Hillary had hamstrung her own campaign and dealt the most serious blow to her own presidential aspirations.

That state of denial would become more obvious than ever to her top aides and consultants during one conference call in the thick of the public discussion of her server. Joel Benenson, Mandy Grunwald, Jim Margolis, John Anzalone, John Podesta, Mook, Huma Abedin and Dan Schwerin were among the small coterie who huddled in Abedin’s mostly bare corner office overlooking the East River at the campaign’s Brooklyn headquarters. Hillary and Bill, who rarely visited, joined them by phone.


====
Lots of bickering and finger pointing. It is quite funny that she spent over $1 billion and Trump spent $60 million and she could only win 20 states.Thank goodness America was spared of this untalented hack.
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
That is why she lost. No one to blame but herself.
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
Reminds me a lot of the whiny liberAL cnts on the RX
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,118
Tokens
Reminds me a lot of the whiny liberAL cnts on the RX

it's genetics

when everyone acknowledges it's an illness for which there is still no cure, then all the wasted banter will subside

all you're not one that wastes much banter my friend
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
She was the worst candidate I have ever seen. And libs consider themselves the educated party....lol
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
To be fair many liberal voters weren't all that thrilled. She only got votes because of all the anti Trump people. I didn't think Guesser or Vitterd really liked her all that much, they just thought she was better than Trump and that she would win.. Well almost everyone thought she was going to win. Trump maybe a diamond in the rough
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens
Very disappointed that on Jan 21, 2009 the national Dem Party anointed her for 2016 and then made absolutely no effort to cultivate a qualified candidate in the age 46-51 range, which just so happens to be the age range of past two Dem POTUS. Thus all we had as even remotely viable alternative was a 75 year old Bernie Sanders who loses voters like me due to both his age and his severe denouncement of capitalistic success

To very much his own credit, Donnie recognized how both the national GOP was in shambles since 2008 and he also recognized just how dismal a candidate Hillary was in spite of her being able to pull more popular votes nationally
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,874
Tokens
LMFAO, now Hillary is on a "witch hunt" to find out who is talking badly about her to the media.
And, it may very well be Huma

One source said, “The knives are out to find the people who spoke about the campaign to the authors of this book. Dennis has been texting prominent campaign staffers, asking who talked. He’s on a witch hunt to find out who talked to save their own skin, throwing Hillary and her campaign manager Robby Mook under the bus.”

The source added, “There’s some speculation that Huma Abedin cooperated to save her own reputation. However, she and Hillary are still very close.”
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,118
Tokens
She was the worst candidate I have ever seen. And libs consider themselves the educated party....lol

John McCain?

Mike Dukakis?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,874
Tokens
And the sorest, most pathetic campaign loser I've ever seen came out of the woods yesterday to say Comey, Russia and misogyny.


Clinton said she was on track to winning the election until Oct. 28, when news broke that Comey had sent a letter to Congress announcing that he had reopened the investigation into her emails.

Clinton also attributed the loss to Russian hackers who allegedly attacked Democratic email accounts, then gave the emails to WikiLeaks for publication.

“I was on the way to winning until the combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me, but got scared off,” Clinton said.


:hammerit
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
32,861
Tokens
i would hate to think even now what 4 yrs under this person would be like,thank god it did not happen, we work hard here in nc to stop her
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,118
Tokens
And the sorest, most pathetic campaign loser I've ever seen came out of the woods yesterday to say Comey, Russia and misogyny.


Clinton said she was on track to winning the election until Oct. 28, when news broke that Comey had sent a letter to Congress announcing that he had reopened the investigation into her emails.

Clinton also attributed the loss to Russian hackers who allegedly attacked Democratic email accounts, then gave the emails to WikiLeaks for publication.

“I was on the way to winning until the combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me, but got scared off,” Clinton said.


:hammerit

haha, let the stupid senile bitch feel better about herself, she's so yesterday
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
I think we all know how Wikileaks got those emails.........Seth Rich!!!!! One of their own, who was a Bernie guy and was disgruntled at Hillary and the DNC for fixing things in the primary... He paid for that with his life, a hit was put on him by the DNC and Clintons...

Just another in the long line of "curious" deaths associated with being associated with the Clintons....

What a sore fvcking loser she is.... Everything thing was all lined up for her and she still could not pull it out because she is such an awful candidate let alone a deplorable human being.... I don't wish bad things on people but I truly hope she dies a very long and painful death...
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Hillary and her flock seek 2020 Rematch

(I think the first thing her campaign needs to do is higher ckid as director of communications - SL)


Jim Geraghty May 9, 2017

Hillary Clinton and her crew think that a rematch with Donald Trump in 2020 would set things right. Here we go again. You really want this, Hillary Clinton fans? You’re really itching for the same personalities, arguments, records, scandals, and debates all over again?

Fine. Let’s do it. Let’s have a Clinton–Trump rematch in 2020. A lot of us dread being faced with those options again, but Hillary Clinton and a portion of her supporters seem to think that the 2016 election result was just a weird fluke, a historical accident, and that for the second time in eight years, a combination of unlikely factors have conspired to unfairly deny Hillary an office that is rightfully hers.

Discussing her loss last week, Clinton said “she takes full responsibility,” but then added that she thought FBI director James Comey and Russian meddling were decisive factors.

“Every day that goes by, we learn more about some of the unprecedented interference, including from a foreign power whose leader is not a member of my fan club,” she told Christine Amanpour last week. “[Vladimir Putin] certainly interfered in our election, and it was clear he interfered to hurt me and to help my opponent.” “

And if you chart my opponent and his campaign’s statements,” Clinton continued, “they quite coordinated with the goals that that leader, who shall remain nameless, had.” Old habits die hard; Clinton referred to President Trump as “my opponent” five times in that interview. Two words that never escaped Hillary Clinton’s lips in this sequence: “President Trump.”

When Clinton boasted about winning the national popular vote, Amanpour joked, “I see a tweet coming.” The former secretary of state responded, “Better that than interfering in foreign affairs if he wants to tweet about me!” Except . . . President Trump isn’t “interfering” in foreign affairs; whether you voted for him or not, he is the president of the United States and is implementing a foreign policy. You can love that foreign policy or hate it, but he’s not some outsider who wandered into the Oval Office when no one was looking.

Despite some generous gestures, such as attending Trump’s inauguration, Clinton’s real perspective is starting to slip out. Trump didn’t really win fair and square, and thus, he’s not really president. He’s just some goofball who won by accident and is “interfering” in the process of governing that is Hillary Clinton’s natural responsibility. Oh, and the presidential debate moderators let her down by not asking the right questions: “You know, I kept waiting for the moment.

I’ve watched a million presidential debates in my life, and I was waiting for the moment when one of the people asking the questions would have said, well, so exactly how are you going to create more jobs? Right? I mean, I thought that, you know, I thought at some moment that would happen.” Or maybe, Clinton offered, it was just the wrong year: “You know, it’s very difficult to succeed a two-term president of your own party,” Clinton said. “That is a historical fact. And Democrats haven’t done it since, Lord knows, like the 1820s or ’30s. A long time ago.”

In the past weeks, Clinton made clear she expects to continue to be a leading voice in Democratic-party politics. She’s writing another book, has announced the launch of a new Super PAC, and says she plans on being active on the trail helping Democratic candidates in 2018. She declared, “I’m back to being an activist citizen, and part of the resistance.” You might have thought that managing to lose to Donald Trump by 77 electoral votes — after the Access Hollywood tape broke! — would persuade anyone that it’s time to depart the national political stage and let others carry the torch.

You might think that more Democrats would say, “Thanks, but no thanks” to the woman who managed to bobble the easiest layup in American political history. You might think that more Democrats would say, ‘Thanks, but no thanks’ to the woman who managed to bobble the easiest layup in American political history.

You would think wrong, apparently. “I think that Hillary’s voice is a powerful one in this resistance,” gushed Patti Solis Doyle, a Democratic political operative. “The resistance needs all the voices it can have, [and that] it can get, and the fact she can get under his skin, I think it’s a powerful thing for this resistance.” (Really? How hard is it to get under Trump’s skin?)

In many Democratic eyes, the 2016 election is one of the great injustices of modern history, a national tragedy that cannot stand. Peter Daou, an adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, declared earlier this spring that “a hostile power helped elect our president,” that “Russia tampered with VOTERS” and that “the only fair and just resolution is to have popular vote winner Hillary Clinton take office. Or to hold a new election.”

Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren contended that President Trump shouldn’t be allowed to nominate Supreme Court justices until the FBI investigation of his campaign is over. It’s clear now. In the minds of many Democrats, Donald Trump wasn’t legitimately elected.

The Russian meddling disqualifies him. A December poll found 52 percent of Democrats believed Russia had hacked and altered the election vote totals. Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, quite a few Democrats don’t believe that Donald Trump actually beat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election. The easiest way to dispel this myth is to just do the whole thing all over again — with Trump enjoying all of the institutional advantages of incumbency but and also the potential risk of not having made America great again.

The stakes are prefect. If Hillary wins, 2016 was indeed a giant astronomically unlikely fluke. If Trump wins, Hillary and Bill and Chelsea should go away and live quiet lives out of the spotlight. Sorry, every other Democrat with presidential ambitions. You’ll just have to wait another four years . . . again. This time, Hillary Clinton and her fans are sure she’s figured it out. If Democrats are dumb enough to challenge Trump with the one woman in the world who has proven she can lose to him in a general election, who are we to stop them?

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447428/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-2020-rematch
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,874
Tokens
LMFAO

NJ1O462A
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,528
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com