Remember how "science" showed conservatives were loons? Well, it turns out the authors published the study with the findings exactly backwards (and some researchers are saying this was deliberate)
"Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response," the correction said. "Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck's psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative."
If you believe the conclusions of the research, then liberals are hell bent on Authoritarianism and more unhappy than conservatives.
Science!
"Thus, where we indicated that higher scores in Table 1 (page 40) reflect a more conservative response, they actually reflect a more liberal response," the correction said. "Specifically, in the original manuscript, the descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck's psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal; and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative."
If you believe the conclusions of the research, then liberals are hell bent on Authoritarianism and more unhappy than conservatives.
Science!