Here you go boys & freaks, all the dirt McCain has on Palin

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090100710.html

The aide said all facts about Palin's record and background that have caused controversy as they were revealed in the past few days -- including the ongoing "troopergate" investigation and the fact that Palin's 17-year-old daughter is pregnant -- were known to the McCain campaign. Washington lawyer Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr. led the search team.
"Nothing that has come out did not come out in the vet. She was fully vetted," the senior aide said.



------------------------------------------------------------------



The process included what aides described as a full search of public documents and videos of her speeches. That included a review of Alaska newspapers, but not Palin's local newspaper because aides worried that going through back issues would indicate that she was under consideration to be McCain's running mate.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Among the things that turned up during the vetting process: her husband's arrest for driving under the influence more than two decades ago; the ticket that she once received for fishing without a license; her daughter's pregnancy; and a report that she had supported Pat Buchanan for president in 1996, which she denied at the time.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Her name, along with others, was submitted to the FBI under a routine inquiry into whether she was the subject of a criminal investigation.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
Oh that's a great excuse. They didn't bother to vet her because they didn't want anybody to know she was under consideration. Are you fucking kidding me???
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
4,223
Tokens
They didnt vet her cause they didnt want people to know they were interested? LMFAO...wow. Dont disrespect the citizens of the United States of America like that. Shame on McCain.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens
Oh that's a great excuse. They didn't bother to vet her because they didn't want anybody to know she was under consideration. Are you fucking kidding me???

Why do they need an excuse? It's an explanation of why the didn't go through some village newspaper that has 7,200 residents.

You think this is an issue? :missingte

Are you fucking kidding me? :lol:

run Forrest run
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,102
Tokens
Fishing w/o a Licence..........:lolBIG: ..............Over limit now that WOULD be a crime.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
5,137
Tokens
I think it was somewhere in between D2's "google search" and what the McCain's camp says. I'm sure she originally submitted all financial records, speeches, etc. Stuff probably a dozen or so candidates disclosed.

I think he probably knew about the pregnancy last week...in a scramble as the final vetting took place.

Whatever it was, I do now believe Palin was more of a last minute choice after he got the hell no on Lieberman. Even republican operatives are saying that.

The reason why I believe this is

-McCain only found out about the pregnancy last week. It's apparently an open secret in her hometown. If she had been a serious candidate before last week..he surely would've known about it.

-NBC reports that Republican party lawyers are now doing a legal vetting of VP selection Sarah Palin while ABC reports that Republican operatives are now headed to Alaska to find out whatever else they can about Palin.

Moreover, A Republican with ties to the campaign said the team assigned to vet Ms. Palin in Alaska had not arrived there until Thursday, a day before Mr. McCain stunned the political world with his vice-presidential choice. The campaign was still calling Republican operatives as late as Sunday night asking them to go to Alaska to deal with the unexpected candidacy of Ms. Palin.

They can spin it whatever way they want but you don't send people up afterwards if you did your thorough vetting before.

-Also, either the FBI is lying or McCain's camp. "Ms. Palin had been subjected to an F.B.I. background check, an F.B.I. official said Monday the bureau did not vet potential candidates and had not known of her selection until it was made public."

Either way whether this is true or not the perception of it being true and McCain making a haste decision is not good news for the campaign.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens
Bet-it, the FBI was not asked to do a background check, but asked to disclose if she is under criminal investigation.

There were many many other candidates he could have picked besides Palin, so I don't give the Lieberman story much weight.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
5,137
Tokens
Bet-it, the FBI was not asked to do a background check, but asked to disclose if she is under criminal investigation.

There were many many other candidates he could have picked besides Palin, so I don't give the Lieberman story much weight.

FBI- Okay I got it. Then Rick Davis's quote in the WaPost is a bit misleading but whatever.

What about the other points?

What is your take then?

Was she the one the whole time?

Lieberman was on Morning Joe this morning and made it seem like he was there until the bitter end.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
Why do they need an excuse? It's an explanation of why the didn't go through some village newspaper that has 7,200 residents.

You think this is an issue? :missingte

Are you fucking kidding me? :lol:

run Forrest run

They didn't talk to ANYBODY in Alaska -- nobody in government, business, her community, etc. They didn't talk to anybody. That's just crazy. So what if people knew. Yeah, so she was on the short list. Big deal. Why did that have to be a secret? Just ridiculous.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
937
Tokens
'October Surprise' Over Palin Investigation?

"Likely Damaging" Report on Governor Scheduled for Release Days Before November Election

By BRIAN ROSS and LEN TEPPER

Sept. 2, 2008—

Is the McCain campaign afraid of an 'October surprise' involving vice-presidential pick Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska?

The Alaska state senator running an investigation of Gov. Palin says the McCain campaign is using stall tactics to prevent him from releasing his final report by Oct. 31, four days before the November election.

"It's likely to be damaging to the Governor," said Senator Hollis French, a Democrat, appointed the project manager for a bi-partisan State Senate Legislative Counsel Committee investigation of claims that Palin abused her office to get the Alaska public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, fired.

Palin, who has denied any wrongdoing and has said she has nothing to hide, hired private lawyers on Saturday, the day after Sen. McCain announced her as his running mate.

"Until then, the Governor used state lawyers and everything was fine," said Sen. French.

"That's wrong," said a spokesperson for the McCain campaign, Brian Rogers.

"The attorney was hired by the state Department of Law weeks ago, as part of the official duty to defend the governor," said Roger, and "obviously had nothing to do with either the McCain campaign."

A team of McCain campaign operatives arrived in Anchorage over the weekend "to help coordinate" her vice-presidential campaign, according to a McCain campaign official.

In a letter sent on Friday, Gov. Palin's new lawyer, Thomas V. Van Flein, requested a full list of documents, other evidence and witness statements from the Senate's investigation.

Senator French responded "it would be highly unusual for an investigator to share information with one of the targets of the investigation."
French said he still wanted to take testimony from Governor Palin sometime in September about allegations she wanted the public safety commissioner to fire her ex-brother-in-law following a messy divorce to her sister.

"The Governor first issued a blanket denial but now she's had to back down and that's a problem," said French. "She has a credibility problem," he said.

<!-- page -->French says the investigation will also seek to learn how the Governor's office obtained confidential information from her ex-brother-in-law's personnel file.

"If she was involved, it would be a violation of state law," said French.

The controversy over the firing of public safety commissioner Monegan has been simmering for months in Alaska. Monegan has alleged he was fired because he rebuffed pressure from the Governor and her husband to dismiss her brother-in-law who served as a state trooper.

Palin says that she dismissed Monegan over an honest disagreement over budget priorities.

French says the McCain campaign failed to contact any of the Senators involved in the investigation during the vetting process of Gov. Palin.

"If they had done their job they never would have picked her," said French. "Now they may have to deal with an October surprise," he said, referring to the scheduled release Oct. 31 of the committee's final report.

The report is a preliminary step prior to any effort to impeach the Governor, said French.

"That will be for the legislature to decide," he said.

McCain campaign officials say they were aware of the "trooper thing" but did not consider it an impediment to her selection as the running mate.

Click Here for the Investigative Homepage.


Copyright © 2008 ABC News Internet Ventures
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens
FBI- Okay I got it. Then Rick Davis's quote in the WaPost is a bit misleading but whatever.

What about the other points?

What is your take then?

Was she the one the whole time?

Lieberman was on Morning Joe this morning and made it seem like he was there until the bitter end.

Why would he be in it to the very end and say no? Lieberman would have told his good friend he's not interested a long time ago. He may very well have been in the mix until the very end.

I'm not sure any actions being taken by the Republican party, if true, are out of the ordinary. This type of chit has never been covered before. It's very possible the whole situation is being misrepresented, see the "FBI and background check".

McCain knew about the pregnancy before he made his decision, that's all that really matters. How long he knew about it is not very important.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
937
Tokens
Palin's Small Alaska Town Secured Big Federal Funds

By Paul Kane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 2, 2008; Page A01
ST. PAUL, Minn., Sept. 1 -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.
This Story
EARMARKS: Palin's Small Alaska Town Secured Big Federal Funds
GOP Running Mates Rework Message, Put Accent on 'Change'
Tuesday, Sept. 2 at 2 p.m. ET: Election 2008: Republicans in Hollywood
McCain and Palin Begin Joint Campaign
Cindy McCain Encourages Gustav Relief
The Trail: McCain Raises Record $47 Million, Thanks to Palin
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story
There was $500,000 for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, $900,000 for sewer repairs, and $15 million for a rail project -- all intended to benefit Palin's town, Wasilla, located about 45 miles north of Anchorage.
In introducing Palin as his running mate on Friday, Sen. John McCain cast her as a compatriot in his battle against wasteful federal spending. McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, hailed Palin as a politician "with an outstanding reputation for standing up to special interests and entrenched bureaucracies -- someone who has fought against corruption and the failed policies of the past, someone who's stopped government from wasting taxpayers' money."
McCain's crusade against earmarks -- federal spending sought by members of Congress to benefit specific projects -- has been a hallmark of his campaign. He has said earmarks are wasteful and are often inserted into bills with little oversight, sometimes by a single powerful lawmaker.
Palin has also railed against earmarks, touting her opposition to a $223 million bridge in the state as a prime credential for the vice presidential nomination. "As governor, I've stood up to the old politics-as-usual, to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the good-ol'-boy network," she said Friday.
As mayor of Wasilla, however, Palin oversaw the hiring of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, an Anchorage-based law firm with close ties to Alaska's most senior Republicans: Rep. Don Young and Sen. Ted Stevens, who was indicted in July on charges of accepting illegal gifts. The Wasilla account was handled by the former chief of staff to Stevens, Steven W. Silver, who is a partner in the firm.

Palin was elected mayor of Wasilla in 1996 on a campaign theme of "a time for change." According to a review of congressional spending by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group in Washington, Wasilla did not receive any federal earmarks in the first few years of Palin's tenure.
Senate records show that Silver's firm began working for Palin in early 2000, just as federal money began flowing.
In fiscal 2000, Wasilla received a $1 million earmark, tucked into a transportation appropriations bill, for a rail and bus project in the town. And in the winter of 2000, Palin appeared before congressional appropriations committees to seek earmarks, according to a report in the Anchorage Daily News.
Palin and the Wasilla City Council increased Silver's fee from $24,000 to $36,000 a year by 2001, Senate records show.
Soon after, the city benefited from additional earmarks: $500,000 for a mental health center, $500,000 for the purchase of federal land and $450,000 to rehabilitate an agricultural processing facility. Then there was the $15 million rail project, intended to connect Wasilla with the town of Girdwood, where Stevens has a house.
The Washington trip is now an annual event for Wasilla officials.

In fiscal year 2002, Wasilla took in $6.1 million in earmarks -- about $1,000 in federal money for every resident. By contrast, Boise, Idaho -- which has more than 190,000 residents -- received $6.9 million in earmarks in fiscal 2008.
This Story
EARMARKS: Palin's Small Alaska Town Secured Big Federal Funds
GOP Running Mates Rework Message, Put Accent on 'Change'
Tuesday, Sept. 2 at 2 p.m. ET: Election 2008: Republicans in Hollywood
McCain and Palin Begin Joint Campaign
Cindy McCain Encourages Gustav Relief
The Trail: McCain Raises Record $47 Million, Thanks to Palin
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story
All told, Wasilla benefited from $26.9 million in earmarks in Palin's final four years in office.
"She certainly wasn't shy about putting the old-boy network to use to bring home millions of dollars," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense. "She's a little more savvy to the ways of Washington than she's let on."
Silver, reached by phone at his Vienna home, declined to comment. Wasilla's town offices were closed Monday for the Labor Day holiday.
Maria Comella, Palin's campaign spokeswoman, said Palin sought the Wasilla earmarks because she was "working in the best interests of Alaska, working within the confines of the current system."
Palin became a staunch reform advocate after her 2003 appointment to the state's Oil and Gas Commission. She accused another commissioner -- Alaska Republican Party Chairman Randy Ruedrich -- of raising campaign contributions from industries he was regulating. "She realized that the environment around her was no longer what it once was, and elected officials were abusing their power," Comella said.
Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, used to secure earmarks for public nonprofits in Illinois, but he announced last year that he would no longer seek earmarks for any entity. Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), Obama's running mate, co-sponsored $85.6 million in earmarks for 2008, according to one study.
The Palin earmarks came when Stevens was chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee and Young was a senior member of the House transportation committee.

In hiring Silver, Wasilla found someone who was a member of each lawmaker's inner circle. Silver has donated at least $11,400 to Stevens's political committees and $10,000 to Young's reelection committee in the past decade, according to Federal Election Commission records.
Sliver's firm employed Stevens's son, Ben Stevens, in the late 1990s as a federal lobbyist, according to multiple media accounts. Ben Stevens was not listed on lobbying disclosure forms as having worked on Wasilla earmarks.
The firm became ensnared in the wide-ranging federal investigation of corruption by Alaska Republican officials. Federal agents reviewed records about its other municipal clients, as well as fishing companies represented by Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh that were close to Ben Stevens.
The investigation has increasingly focused on Veco, a now-defunct energy services company whose chief executive, Bill Allen Jr., pleaded guilty in May 2007 to bribing Alaska officials.
Ted Stevens is awaiting trial on charges that he accepted more than $250,000 in unreported gifts from Allen. Ben Stevens, who has not been charged, has been identified in court documents as having accepted more than $240,000 in consulting payments in exchange for legislative favors while he served in the state Senate.
A Veco executive testified last year in a criminal trial that Allen had ordered him to arrange annual fundraisers for Young. The congressman has not been charged with any crimes.
After becoming governor, Palin became a critic of Young and the Stevenses. She endorsed Young's opponent in a Republican primary last week that is still too close to call, and last year she demanded Ben Stevens's resignation as Alaska's member of the Republican National Committee. She has also criticized Ted Stevens.
In addition, Palin has reversed course on at least one major earmark: After initially supporting the $223 million bridge, which was to connect the town of Ketchikan with a remote island, she reversed course last year and canceled the project because of cost overruns. Critics have dubbed the project the "Bridge to Nowhere."
But her administration remains eager for many other earmarks.
In February, Palin's office sent Sen. Stevens a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for Alaska.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens
from the OP

The aide said all facts about Palin's record and background that have caused controversy as they were revealed in the past few days -- including the ongoing "troopergate" investigation and the fact that Palin's 17-year-old daughter is pregnant -- were known to the McCain campaign. Washington lawyer Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr. led the search team.
"Nothing that has come out did not come out in the vet. She was fully vetted," the senior aide said.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
this is an issue that would be front and center

maybe they're not very concerned, preparing for her defense is natural. Maybe that explains why attorneys went to Alaska betit. Preparing to defend yourself is not a crime.

She has an 80% approval rating from the residents of Alaska, who I can only surmise are fully aware the allegations in this case.

This is the one issue that raises some questions for me, especially with respect to the timing of the scheduled release.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
5,137
Tokens
What is the McCain camp suppose to say? I'm sure they knew about most of this stuff, I don't doubt that. I do think the pregnancy thing timing of when they knew can clue you into the timing of their vetting.

The one explanation of yours that I actually agree with is the coverage issue. This has never been covered before like this before so no one really knows the normal process.

Either way, you can at least agree the perception of this is not really good.

Palin can probably erase most of this with a knock out speech Wednesday.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,144
Tokens
What is the McCain camp suppose to say? I'm sure they knew about most of this stuff, I don't doubt that. I do think the pregnancy thing timing of when they knew can clue you into the timing of their vetting.

The one explanation of yours that I actually agree with is the coverage issue. This has never been covered before like this before so no one really knows the normal process.

Either way, you can at least agree the perception of this is not really good.

Palin can probably erase most of this with a knock out speech Wednesday.

ok
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
What is the McCain camp suppose to say? I'm sure they knew about most of this stuff, I don't doubt that. I do think the pregnancy thing timing of when they knew can clue you into the timing of their vetting.

The one explanation of yours that I actually agree with is the coverage issue. This has never been covered before like this before so no one really knows the normal process.

Either way, you can at least agree the perception of this is not really good.

Palin can probably erase most of this with a knock out speech Wednesday.

I don't think the speech will go too far either way. Much more interesting and important will be how she answers tough questions and has to address issues she has never really addressed or considered before.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
5,137
Tokens
Speech goes a long way towards defining her, she needs a good speech desperately.

The tough questions and issues won't come until later on.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
502
Tokens
I wouldn't necessarily take McCain's words here at face value. He HAS TO say he knew about it beforehand.

What's the alternative? "I had no idea"? That'd make him look even worse and incompetent.

Whether the pregnancy story came to McCain as a complete surprise or not, he HAS TO act as if this was all expected and part of the plan. He cannot under any circumstances admit that he wasn't rigorous enough on the vetting process.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,859
Messages
13,574,238
Members
100,878
Latest member
fo88giftt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com