" I sure would like to know what kind of jobs you have Sportsavant, Jackdee and barman where you feel drug use is a private matter and therefore none of your employer's concern."
i work in i.t., information technology, i am a script writer, and of course a gambler, besides the well thought out and elaborate points from barman, which i second, i would like to ask you why am i not entitled to drug test my employer as well, i mean having a coke head, and i ve had had a lot of those types, as an employer, or suspecting i have one, i should be entitled to drug test him and not suffer his mood swings, his manic mentality, irregular temperament and domineering predesposition. Or is it that might makes right, and since he or she are paying me they can subject me to any scrutiny they wish too, breaching my private life again and again with say email monitoring, office cameras etc. etc. while i as an individual am supposed to go through all that as a docile lamp.
Let's face it anyone who has been out and about, and done a few illegal drugs knows the exact situation with them, and it's not a mere matter of political correctness, most drugs are dealt with the permission of the power structures, or by the governments itself, their suppresion is the very lever of power. While higher echelons, such as upper middle classes, big $ execs, hollywood actors, politicians etc. can both buy and use their designer drugs freeely, the lower classes are being sold crack and other highly destabilizing drugs fabricated in say oh arizona, for the sole purposes of suppresion of will and class control.
If anyone wishes to respond to this post, i would at least expect them to have some rudimentary knowledge of the drug scene and it's machinations if you smoke or have smoked the occasional spliff, or done the occasional acid or shroom, with no insight or experience of cops, dealers and street drugs then there's no use.
I am not a drug user, well i drink more than i d like to, and smoke tobaco more than i should, but other than that i ve outgrown my pot years, although if it were legal i might exchange my nightly white russian for say some good, smooth sensi milia occasionaly, but i believe in freedom of drug use, and the filth and immense profits, as well as the political power exerted in the whole drugs issue, goes well beyond some puritan ethic on hair screening.
i work in i.t., information technology, i am a script writer, and of course a gambler, besides the well thought out and elaborate points from barman, which i second, i would like to ask you why am i not entitled to drug test my employer as well, i mean having a coke head, and i ve had had a lot of those types, as an employer, or suspecting i have one, i should be entitled to drug test him and not suffer his mood swings, his manic mentality, irregular temperament and domineering predesposition. Or is it that might makes right, and since he or she are paying me they can subject me to any scrutiny they wish too, breaching my private life again and again with say email monitoring, office cameras etc. etc. while i as an individual am supposed to go through all that as a docile lamp.
Let's face it anyone who has been out and about, and done a few illegal drugs knows the exact situation with them, and it's not a mere matter of political correctness, most drugs are dealt with the permission of the power structures, or by the governments itself, their suppresion is the very lever of power. While higher echelons, such as upper middle classes, big $ execs, hollywood actors, politicians etc. can both buy and use their designer drugs freeely, the lower classes are being sold crack and other highly destabilizing drugs fabricated in say oh arizona, for the sole purposes of suppresion of will and class control.
If anyone wishes to respond to this post, i would at least expect them to have some rudimentary knowledge of the drug scene and it's machinations if you smoke or have smoked the occasional spliff, or done the occasional acid or shroom, with no insight or experience of cops, dealers and street drugs then there's no use.
I am not a drug user, well i drink more than i d like to, and smoke tobaco more than i should, but other than that i ve outgrown my pot years, although if it were legal i might exchange my nightly white russian for say some good, smooth sensi milia occasionaly, but i believe in freedom of drug use, and the filth and immense profits, as well as the political power exerted in the whole drugs issue, goes well beyond some puritan ethic on hair screening.
