I already said I'm biased as a suns fan retard. but I dont think I'm crying about this. I'm trying to understand how such a blatantly unfair rule is still in the game and how other teams can justify it.
BTW, The hack a shaq is not the same as the Intentional walk. Managers have the option of pinch hitting for that pitcher if they want. There is no alternative to having shaq shoot those shots.
every team can use the rule. it's not only against shaq. it's not unfair, it's a rule. geez, wonder how shaq has won 4 rings with this unfair rule? maybe your team is just soft and not good enough.
why would a manager pinch hit in the 4th inning of a scoreless game?
The closing seconds of regulation or the 1st overtime in game 1. The commentator said something like you should get it down to Shaq because you know he will get fouled and he only needs 1 FT to win the game.
Anyone remember this?
A manager would not ph in the 4th inning of a scoreless game b/c it's not advantageous to do so. Just like Pop would not start Hack a Shaq in the middle of the 2nd qtr (foul trouble too early, alot of game left, etc).
The difference with the Intentional walk, is when the game is on the line in the late innings, managers WILL pinch hit for the "weaker" hitter.
In the late stages of the game tho, Shaq and only shaq can shoot those FT's even though he never has possession of the ball.
Key thing to consider... how is this type of foul different from an Intentional foul?
The T.V. guys addressed it last night saying the rules committee needs to look into this rule.
Can't blame the opposition for such a decision as winning isn't everything it is the only thing