HinesWard86 said:
you really think that hes thinking about blowing out thier acl's or even hurting them you have to be crazy.
...
"im running after a dude that running a 4.4 and i want to win this game but shit if i tackle him by his collar he might get hurt so im going to do it"
is this shit stupid to anyone else?
actually it's not condoned anymore, it's been marked illegal now.
and instinct tells you to tackle someone, not to tackle someone in such a way that causes the least amount of injury.
bottom line is, it's still fucked up that you think it'd be ok to have gruden mark vick and get him injured intentionally.
and instinct tells you to tackle someone, not to tackle someone in such a way that causes the least amount of injury.
bottom line is, it's still fucked up that you think it'd be ok to have gruden mark vick and get him injured intentionally.
after FOUR times hurting people if you felt any remorse you would train yourself not to make the tackle like that. it is also much easier to tackle the guy from the back or at the legs than that. think about it jasin, if you are in pursuit of a guy does instinct to tackle him...dead pursuit right behind him in what instance would you pull him down by the neck?????? you'd dive for the legs like everyone else, not named roy williams, does
Dsethi said:
its been MARKED illegal, but its never called. im just saying this.....dont pick and choose what's cheap and what's not. if you allow williams to do those tackles....allow and expect those scrums for fumbles......and basically allow some cheapshots but not others than how is that fair? its not......and i see no difference between an open cheap shot on a player and a roy williams tackle or a battle for a loose ball where guys are getting their balls squeezed/bit/kicked
its all hypocritical, unethical, and revolting
dsethi, tell that to Earnhardt fans.........
and it rarely occured before williams came into the league. williams is basically the only player in the league to do that tackle on a regular basis. and williams didn't stop that tackle until the outcry after he injured TO in 2004 when people looked back and realized how many people he had fucked up doing that before the TO incident
and it rarely occured before williams came into the league. williams is basically the only player in the league to do that tackle on a regular basis. and williams didn't stop that tackle until the outcry after he injured TO in 2004 when people looked back and realized how many people he had fucked up doing that before the TO incident
fuck you moral queers. Hines is right, you want to win the game? take out vick. Maybe don't do it illegally, but make sure you hit him as often as possible.
This is real life, not some fantasy TV show where everyone plays fair. The fact is I have TB -5.5, and if Vick is in the way of me winning that bet, someone should break his leg.
This is real life, not some fantasy TV show where everyone plays fair. The fact is I have TB -5.5, and if Vick is in the way of me winning that bet, someone should break his leg.
uppy: Gotta admit I did not expect Gaylord Perry in this thread....hines isn't saying do it fairly, he's saying do it illegally and unfairly.juice said:
of course u hit vick as many times as u can, thats what EVERYONE does in the league. that's not unfair or illegal, that's how the game is played.
The game is not played in a fashion where you rack up roughing-the-passer penalties to take Vick out.
