Thanks.
Its analysis like this that makes this forum so valuable.
You gotta let you QB play. If he sucks you will lose anyway. And Rodgers is most likely out for the year. Let the kid play and throw.....don't play that conservative garbage. It's self destruct modeOut of context, smartass.
I suppose you had Houston yesterday thinking losing Watson is only s 4-5 point ATS difference.
With the wide open system GB runs with Rodgers, moving to Hundley is problematic. They will come out tonight ultra conservative, a whole different approach.
So you think Hundley will mimic Rodgers? I don’t.
He’ll play like Brissett.
Not what I'm saying. Brissett is good enough to get the win here if you let him play. It isn't about whether he is a good as Rodgers. It is about giving him a chance. You wanna run the ball....play conservative and call garbage safe passes all day.....no one is winning in todays NFL
Out of context, smartass.
I suppose you had Houston yesterday thinking losing Watson is only s 4-5 point ATS difference.
With the wide open system GB runs with Rodgers, moving to Hundley is problematic. They will come out tonight ultra conservative, a whole different approach.
Out of context, smartass.
I suppose you had Houston yesterday thinking losing Watson is only s 4-5 point ATS difference.
With the wide open system GB runs with Rodgers, moving to Hundley is problematic. They will come out tonight ultra conservative, a whole different approach.
Thanks definitely agree a lot of uncertainty around GB QB.
You have to like Stafford an upper tier QB who can zing the ball 20-30 yard pattens against the GB pass defense, and wonder if Hundley can keep up.
Lions got a lot of yards vs Pittsburg but failed in the red zone. Unlucky. Highly unlikely to continue.
Lions need a win and I wonder about GBs psyce after losing Rodgers though they probably will stick to
the program.
It’s 2017 I don’t look at decades old matchup stats since they don’t account for GB losing one of the top QBs of the last 30 years.