GoSooners Big 12 Plays Of The Week For Sept.6

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
I had a good opening Big 12 weekend hitting all of the games except the Western Michigan against Nebraska. It was a great debut for Bo Pelini. Better than I thought he would have..And it beats the hell out the debuts by Mike Sherman and Art Briles at Texas A&M and Baylor. A&M should be embarassed losing to a Sunbelt team at home who was pretty much rebuilding themselves. Texas A&M might turn into a complete fade for me this year. They don't have the right players to run their new spread/west coast/whatever offense. And after allowing over 200 yards rushing to Arky St. they also lack some serious muscle on defense. This looks like a tough week in the Big 12 because of the amount of double digit spreads we have. I liking a few "Running Dogs" this week.. And they actually did pretty well this past weekend. Kentucky hit for me against Louisville. But ECU was my top choice. A good running team playing at home against VT, a rebuilding ACC team and getting 10 points. It doesn't get much better than that. And of course Arky State was a good running dog. But the fool that I am, I just didn't have the balls to play that game. I'll see if I can find us a few running dog prospects to cherrypick this week.. I haven't decided if I'm going to play it yet, but Nevada is a running dog. They had over 400 yards rushing last week out of their "Pistol" offense. I'm going to see how the line moves with this game before I decide if I want to play them against Texas Tech. The thing that makes me nervous about that game is the Nevada defense. Or lack of it. But for running dogs, I feel that a good defense is more important to have on the road than at home...

Last Week:

** Plays 5-2
*** Plays 2-1
**** Plays 0-0


San Jose State at Nebraska...This will be a bit different game for the Huskers this week. They'll be going up against a team that emphasizes defense a bit more than the Western Michigan team. SJSU isn't a particuarly strong team in any category. But Dick Tomey teams do play good sound fundamental football. And of course he's always preached defense-first dating back to his "Desert Swarm" defense days at Arizona. So even though their offense has gotten off to a slow start this season, I do expect their defense to play a little better than WM's did against the Huskers. Especially the defensive line, which I feel is much stronger than Western Michigan's. And will test the Huskers run game. SJSU won't be nearly as potent in the pass game as WM was in scoring 24 on Nebraska. And CAL transfer Reed looks like he's still in transition with this team. And it may take him a few games to get started. Especially in his first game on the road.. Plus I really don't see the excitement for the Huskers coming into this game as they had last week in Pelini's debut. And it could show up a little in their play. I can see Tomey's feisty group holding Nebraska in the 30's this week, and showing them they might have a little more work to do on offense to get ready for the Big 12. I don't see SJSU doing much themselves on offense, so I look for a 35-10 type of game. I wanted to get the total early here before it goes down any more..Taking the (UNDER 59) ***


Cincinnati at Oklahoma...This is another one of those double digit spreads that scare me a little. But I do look for the Sooners to be sky high for this one. And Stoops is taking this game very serious because of the great season this Cincy team had last year. And Kelly is one of the finest coaches in America. But the coach part is pretty much a wash in this game. So he'll have no advantage in Norman against Stoops. One big things going against Cincy in this spot is they no longer have QB Mauk. You don't lose a 60% 3,000 yard passer with a 31-9 ratio and not miss him. Their new QB Grutza is a senior who has had plenty of past experience. But there is a reason he played behind Mauk for the last two years. A 20-24 touchdown-int ratio. I think he's going to find the going tough in his first road trip as a starter in the snakepit of Norman. And I'm sure OU's two outstanding defensive ends will give him a nice welcome party. I do have some concerns with the OU secondary this season. But I think it's going to show up more on the road than it will this game. Cincy runs the spread offense, but OU has seen plenty of these in the Big 12. And they aren't going to be throwing much at OU that they haven't already seen from better QB's and passing teams in the conference. The big thing here is with a depleted RB corp I just don't think Cincy will be able to run on OU. And are going to be forced to go through the air. Which should in turn make added pressure to the QB... The main thing that hurts Cincy this year is losing 10 starters. And especially the 5 key players they lose on defense. And OU has pretty much had 100% focus on this game since they sleepwalked through Chattanooga last week. After last year's fiasco with OU losing in their BCS bowl game to another Big East team West Virginia, the Sooners are going to be looking for some bigtime payback and redemption of sorts. And I think they get here. When this line came out it was actually a little lower than I thought it would be. Which always makes me feel a bit better about my selections...Taking OU (-21) over Cincy ***
 

New member
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
454
Tokens
I had to take OU -22.5. OU plays well early in the season and falls off late. I don't know why, I guess if I did, I would be coach. I like the OU pick, not sure on Nebraska yet, they can pile on the points.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
I had to take OU -22.5. OU plays well early in the season and falls off late. I don't know why, I guess if I did, I would be coach. I like the OU pick, not sure on Nebraska yet, they can pile on the points.
Keep in mind that SJSU QB Reed isn't the prolific passing QB that WM QB Hiller is. Reed only had 132 yards passing in their 13-10 win at home against UC Davis last week. I don't expect it to happen, but Nebraska could go crazy and score 47 points again here. But it still may not be enough to get this total, because I don't see SJSU doing much at all on offense in this game either rushing or passing....Good luck
 

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Messages
68
Tokens
nebraska and OU

I like OU in this one locked in at -21.5. no points. OU early in season has a reputation running the score up on anyone they face. especially at home.

Nebraska - I picked them last week and they came through. SJSU barely beats a 1AA team. I just don't see them having much of a chance away against Nebraska. should cover spread. Western Michigan is much better than SJSU so Im locking this one in on sat if i do well on my first 6 games.

But SJSU is one of those teams who have just someway some how pull the unbelievable upsets.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Nebraska - I picked them last week and they came through. SJSU barely beats a 1AA team. I just don't see them having much of a chance away against Nebraska. should cover spread. Western Michigan is much better than SJSU so Im locking this one in on sat if i do well on my first 6 games.

But SJSU is one of those teams who have just someway some how pull the unbelievable upsets.
I think you would find that there is very little difference between San Jose and Western Michigan. Both teams had 5-7 win-loss records last season. And both teams gave up 30 ppg on defense. Although in my opinion the WAC was a better overall offensive conference than the MAC...I think the thing that hurt Western Michigan against Nebraska was having to break in their third defensive coordinator in three years. And it always takes a team some time to learn new defensive schemes. Tomey has had the same coaching staff in place for the last few years. And SJSU has progressively gotten better on defense each year. The offense is where they need to get better. I wouldn't look for this to be the same kind of game as the WM game was. Tomey knows he can't try to trade jab for jab with Nebraska. He'll probably have a conservative gameplan for his QB going into the game. And keep the turnovers to a minimum like they did all of last season. I think San Jose will make Nebraska earn it..I just don't see one of those 59-0 games. I could be wrong, but I just don't think Nebraska is that good yet.
 

mmmmmmmbeeeerrrrr!!!!
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,774
Tokens
SOONERS


Best of luck this week.....Keep up the great work my friend :103631605


BEER GUY$$
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
I don't know what the fuk happen to this place, but I lost a few pages in the thread. So as is protocol I'll give you the results of this week for the few games I was able to put in.

OU (-21) over Cincy *** (Win)
Nebraska-SJSU (UNDER 59) *** (Win)
Nevada (+10.5) over Texas Tech ** (Loss)
Western Michigan (-6) over N. Ill. *** (Loss)
USF-UCF (UNDER 52) ** (Loss)
Kansas (-20.5) over La Tech ** (Win)
Iowa (-26) over FIU **** (Best Bet) (Win!!)

I caught a little bit of a bad break with the USF-UCF game when overtime killed my under. I usually don't go a season without getting at least couple of these. And Texas Tech was very fortunate to cover their spread. As usual they didn't play well on the road in the favorites role. Nevada outgained them by over 60 yards and had the ball 12 minutes longer than Tech. Thanks to an 82 yard punt return Tech was able to cover the spread by 6 points. And even though Western Michigan won, I missed the cover by three points there. Just one of those weeks. Close but no cigar. But the Best bet play came through for a nice win. As CoachLT says "onward and upward".

Season:

** Plays 6-4
*** Plays 4-2
**** Plays 1-0
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
2,377
Tokens
gj GoSooners, was scared for OU there for a little bit. Looks like they figured it out at halftime.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
gj GoSooners, was scared for OU there for a little bit. Looks like they figured it out at halftime.
Linebets...I was actually very impressed with Cincy. They are a very well coached team with some good skill players.. But when OU started upping the pace of their no-huddle offense in the third quarter it completely wore down the Cincy defense. As SoonerBS mentioned to me, taking OU and some of these other no-huddle teams in second half plays this season may not be a bad idea. BS had OU -10.5 in the second half of that game for an easy win. The big OU O-Line is going to be tough to deal with for an entire 60 minutes. I wished they had gone to the no-huddle last season. So far it's working very well.
 
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
15,518
Tokens
that no huddle is looking awesome indeed.

How about those Buffs with the comeback win haha. That almost had me ripping my regular season win total ticket.

A&M got outgained and manage to win due to turnovers. So they're still looking extremely porous.


GS I'm really gonna hammer USF on Friday. I think KU doesn't match up well physically against them. Thoughts?

BTW congrats on another solid Saturday.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
that no huddle is looking awesome indeed.

How about those Buffs with the comeback win haha. That almost had me ripping my regular season win total ticket.

A&M got outgained and manage to win due to turnovers. So they're still looking extremely porous.


GS I'm really gonna hammer USF on Friday. I think KU doesn't match up well physically against them. Thoughts?

BTW congrats on another solid Saturday.
That Eastern Washington team that Colorado played is no pushover cupcake. They gave Texas Tech fits the week before. You have to watch out for top 10 Division 2 teams. EW was #7 in the country.

Texas A&M will be a good fade team when they get into Big 12 play.

VR...I have a slight lean to South Florida in their game with Kansas. And depending on what kind of number we get, the over total may not be a bad play. I can easily see a 38-31 type of game. USF hasn't showed very good defense when facing quality BCS offenses.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
2,377
Tokens
Texas A&M will be a good fade team when they get into Big 12 play.

I believe when they play the canes, it will also be an opportunity to fade as well. I'm wondering what the line will be around after watching how Miami played Florida yesterday, and how awful A&M looked against NM.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
I believe when they play the canes, it will also be an opportunity to fade as well. I'm wondering what the line will be around after watching how Miami played Florida yesterday, and how awful A&M looked against NM.
The good news is A&M gets two weeks to prepare for the Miami game. But after watching the pourous Canes offense last night (140 total yards), and with the struggles of the A&M offense (only 236 yards vs NM), I would be inclined to take the under in that game provided we get a favorable number.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
1,037
Tokens
A couple ball bounces away from a sweep. You sure nailed the handicapping aspect of it. Nice call on all the games I will certainly be checking your threads throughout the season. Good job.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
A couple ball bounces away from a sweep. You sure nailed the handicapping aspect of it. Nice call on all the games I will certainly be checking your threads throughout the season. Good job.
Thanks bro...I hope to have a few plays up by Tuesday or Wednesday. Right now I'm just waiting and shopping for a few favorable lines this week. Hopefully the RX won't go down again this weekend. I'm getting mighty impatient with this place...BOL
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
297
Tokens
GoSooners, I followed your plays, large on the larger ones (probably larger than I should) and small on the smaller ones and won a bundle on Saturday. Thanks a lot. Started following your threads last year during bowl season and I haven't once been sorry. You are truly a class act. Keep the winners coming.

Blitz
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
GoSooners, I followed your plays, large on the larger ones (probably larger than I should) and small on the smaller ones and won a bundle on Saturday. Thanks a lot. Started following your threads last year during bowl season and I haven't once been sorry. You are truly a class act. Keep the winners coming.

Blitz
Thanks Blitz. Hopefully, the further we get into the season, the more we'll know who the "real" running dogs are, and we can make a little profit on these teams like we did the bowls. I'll list some potential running dogs in my thread later this week, and let you all decide what you like. I've been cherrypicking one or two teams every week that fall into this category. I guess needless to say that ECU has been my best running dog so far this year, knocking off two top 20 teams in a row. But there will be some more emrge as the season goes...BOL this season
 

New member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
2,082
Tokens
GS-

in your original thread when i told you i had iowa i also mentioned that i had the over 41... i said i was hoping for a 42-0 game... kinda funny how things work out...

:toast:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,535
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com