So for example, the year is 2014.
If I did 100 research papers in the last 5 years (dating back to 2009). I could have done 51 of them in 2009-2010 and none after 2010 yet still be considered a " climatologist who produces 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change"
Which is misleading as I could have done nothing in the field for 3+ years.
If I did 100 research papers in the last 5 years (dating back to 2009). I could have done 51 of them in 2009-2010 and none after 2010 yet still be considered a " climatologist who produces 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change"
Which is misleading as I could have done nothing in the field for 3+ years.
Sure it is. You are saying because they "indicated" that they produced over 50% of their peer-reviewed papers on climate research that there is no "mechanism" to prove that those 77 people really did because they could have lied. And even if they did lie about that, their category is well over 80%. So you are still stuck in the minority with the retards. There is no way around it, the scientific community overwhelmingly believes global warming is a fact.
I guess my "GED" was better than wherever you went to school.
When they have to lie to advance their radical agenda, you know it's total bullshit.
ESTIMATED 40 PERCENT OF SCIENTISTS DOUBT MANMADE GLOBAL WARMING
http://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warming
That was 2011.
Let's just say the 'science' has been working against the eco-fascists ever since, so the numbers have most likely reached a plurality for the sane side.
If that isn't enough, Obozo declared "Global Warming a fact" - what else do you need to know!
ESTIMATED 40 PERCENT OF SCIENTISTS DOUBT MANMADE GLOBAL WARMING
http://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warming
That was 2011.
Let's just say the 'science' has been working against the eco-fascists ever since, so the numbers have most likely reached a plurality for the sane side.
If that isn't enough, Obozo declared "Global Warming a fact" - what else do you need to know!
Sure it does. You are saying that 97% number I'm using might not be true because there is no way to "verify" that the climatologists indicating they produced 50% of their papers on climate change is real. When, even if you are right, and they haven't produced 50% of their papers, they still fall in a category that is over 88%. Lmao!!!
It's fun watching you try. You are a classic retard.
You guys criticize my surveys and then post someones opinion??? Lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is fucking hilarious. This is where that number comes from.
S. Fred Singer said in an interview with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) that “the number of skeptical qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is about 40% now.”
This idiocy is why you're regarded as a useless troll.
My responses, and they were all quite clear on the matter, were regarding the differences in the claims you were making about the survey.
Since you are a total, comical embarrassment on that matter, you had to try and change what I was trying to say.
Had to.
So what's not real about it? Are those 75 of 77 respondents not actual climatologists? And you are saying that unless every climatologist throughout the world is surveyed that you don't have a real answer?
Damn, I guess every survey ever isn't real, lol!!! You have never taken a statistics course. So cute watching grown retards try.
