"Global Warming is rubbish"

[akphidelt]

Notice, in your GED world and answer to the question proving you are rank idiot gets the old troll two-step to: "statistics"

You are either dishonest or dumb. Which is it?

Yes, when 75 out of 77 climatologists who produce 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change agree that global warming is real it is statistically significant. That's something you would learn in your statistics class, lol. Like all the polls you reference about how people hate Obamacare or how many disapprove of Obama are like 3000 people out of over 100 million. 75 out of 77 in this case is even more statistically significant than that, lol. A lot more.

You are seriously retarded.

 

[akphidelt]

Yes, you are misrepresenting it.

I never said they "lied" about anything, you imbecile.

So what's your point then? Lol. That they were mistaken about their own research papers?

 

[Acebb]

I'm not misrepresenting it at all.

Yes you are misrepresenting it.

Either that, or you're actually so dumb, you can't understand that "75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming"

Is not the same as: "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Dishonest or stupid, which are you?

 

[akphidelt]

Yes you are misrepresenting it.

Either that, or you're actually so dumb, you can't understand that "75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming"

Is not the same as: "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Dishonest or stupid, which are you?

It's the same thing to normal people, lol. So what's the misrepresentation, that because they "indicate" it, it means it's not true and the 75 out of 77 is a lie? What are you trying to imply? Lmao!!!

 

[Acebb]

So what's your point then? Lol. That they were mistaken about their own research papers?

No, idiot. The people conducting the survey neither defined "indicated" nor did they verify these people authored any papers in that time frame.

You don't have any critical thinking skills. Which is how we know you've topped out at a GED.

 

[akphidelt]

No, idiot. The people conducting the survey neither defined "indicated" nor did they verify these people authored any papers in that time frame.

You don't have any critical thinking skills. Which is how we know you've topped out at a GED.

So you are claiming they lied. Exactly my point. Then you lied about what you were implying. Gotta get your lies straight, lol.

 

[Acebb]

Yes, when 75 out of 77 climatologists who produce 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change agree that global warming is real it is statistically significant.

Hey imbecile, "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Which is not " 75 out of 77 climatologists who produce 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change "

Why do you keep typing your idiotic lie?

 

[Acebb]

So you are claiming they lied.

Uh, you quite literally can not read what the basic sentences say.

Which is also how we know you topped out at a GED

 

[Acebb]

So you are claiming they lied. Exactly my point. Then you lied about what you were implying. Gotta get your lies straight, lol.

I am not claiming anyone "lied" and the fact that you can't understand how stupid you look being unable to see this speaks volumes.

 

[akphidelt]

Uh, you quite literally can not read what the basic sentences say.

Which is also how we know you topped out at a GED

So what are you implying? Lmao! This is so fun.

 

[akphidelt]

Hey imbecile, "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Which is not " 75 out of 77 climatologists who produce 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change "

Why do you keep typing your idiotic lie?

What's the difference? Are you saying those that indicated they produce over 50% of their peer-reviewed publications lied?

 

[Acebb]

It's the same thing to normal people, lol. So what's the misrepresentation, that because they "indicate" it, it means it's not true and the 75 out of 77 is a lie? What are you trying to imply? Lmao!!!

No, you rank imbecile, I actually bolded the important parts.

Yet you can't get it.

Want to guess why?

 

[Acebb]

What's the difference? Are you saying those that indicated they produce over 50% of their peer-reviewed publications lied?

The fact that you can't see those two sentences say different things is high brow comedy.

 

[Acebb]

This "very educated" rank imbecile can't understand that "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Is not the same as: " 75 out of 77 climatologists who produce 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change"

Is hilarious.

 

[akphidelt]

No, you rank imbecile, I actually bolded the important parts.

Yet you can't get it.

Want to guess why?

What am I not getting? 75 out of 77 of the respondents who "indicate" they produce 50% or more of their peer-reviewed research papers believe global warming is real. What hidden meaning are you getting out of that? LMAO!!! You are honestly a lot of fun. The best part is you actually think you are smart. Never seen someone so embarrassing.

 

[akphidelt]

This "very educated" rank imbecile can't understand that "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Is not the same as: " 75 out of 77 climatologists who produce 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change"

Is hilarious.

What's not the same about it? I'm beginning to think you have never taken a statistics course in your life. In fact, I know you haven't.

 

[Acebb]

What am I not getting?

Watching you flail is comical.

 

[akphidelt]

The fact that you can't see those two sentences say different things is high brow comedy.

What is the difference?

 

[akphidelt]

Watching you flail is comical.

I'm just waiting for you to explain yourself so all can see, lol. Proceed Acebb. Tell us all the difference.

 

[Acebb]

What is the difference?

That one sentence reveals that the survey has no verification mechanism (this doesn't mean anyone "lied" it speaks to the value of the survey) and the other sentence implies that these people are doing 50% of their work on climate science when in fact they may not be.