"Global Warming is rubbish"

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
Here is a good reminder about the wisdom of "experts"

Of course, as has already been pointed out, continental drift theory was mocked for 50 years by the titans of the scientific community.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
No you couldn't. And yes they do.

I'd feel sorry for you, but you deserve all the ridicule and scorn you get.

That's why you are on the retard bar.

Again, you actually misrepresented a Web based survey and tried to present it as something it was not because you quite literally can not read words on a screen.

You have a GED and are comically dumb.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming agree that global warming exists. Not sure what more info you need, lol. It's not even a debate, the scientific community believes global warming is a fact.

In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents (with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer- reviewed papers on the subject of climate change (79 individuals in total). Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question 2.

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Again, you actually misrepresented a Web based survey and tried to present it as something it was not because you quite literally can not read words on a screen.

You have a GED and are comically dumb.

No misrepresentation at all. It's a pretty direct and easy survey to understand. Not sure what your crazy mind is getting out of it, lol. You are a nut job.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming agree that global warming exists. Not sure what more info you need, lol. It's not even a debate, the scientific community believes global warming is a fact.



http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

The fact that you keep citing this from January 2009, where again, approximately 5% of the respondents were actual climate scientists, reminds everyone you have a GED.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The fact that you keep citing this from January 2009, where again, approximately 5% of the respondents were actual climate scientists, reminds everyone you have a GED.

How many climatologists do you think there are in the scientific community? Lmao!!! Especially ones that produce over 50% of their research for peer reviewed journals.

You have got to be the dumbest person I know.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Your response was predicted by me.

Because you're a low IQ idiot with a GED.

You're part of the retard bar with Sheriff Joe, scottcarter, festeringZit, and NFLTrends. The retard bar is the 40% of the general public that disagrees with what 90+% of the educated community believes. You are really dumb.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming agree that global warming exists.


=================

Actually, rank idiot, it was "
the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

"Indicated" is not proof. See, you're actually trying to misrepresent the meaning there.

You and your little GED
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming agree that global warming exists.


=================

Actually, rank idiot, it was "
the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

"Indicated" is not proof. See, you're actually trying to misrepresent the meaning there.

You and your little GED

That's your argument? Lmao!!! The retard bar never disappoints!
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
How many climatologists do you think there are in the scientific community? Lmao!!! Especially ones that produce over 50% of their research for peer reviewed journals.

You have got to be the dumbest person I know.

There are more than 157 climate scientists world wide. 157 was the # that responded to the survey.

Further, 90% were from U.S. in the survey. 90% of the word's climate scientists are not in the US
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
There are more than 157 climate scientists world wide. 157 was the # that responded to the survey.

Further, 90% were from U.S. in the survey. 90% of the word's climate scientists are not in the US

Lol, like I said, you don't even understand statistics, lol. You are dumb. That's why you are on the retard bar.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
That's your argument? Lmao!!! The retard bar never disappoints!

You're trying to misrepresent a survey you referenced.

Either that, or you're actually so dumb, you can't understand that "75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming"

Is not the same as: "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Dishonest or stupid, which are you?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
You're trying to misrepresent a survey you referenced.

Either that, or you're actually so dumb, you can't understand that "75 out of 77 climatologists who submit over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on global warming"

Is not the same as: "the respondents indicated that more than 50% of their peer- reviewed publications s in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change"

Dishonest or stupid, which are you?

I'm not misrepresenting it at all. Your misrepresenting it by saying they lied about their peer reviewed publications, lol. You are really dumb.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
You don't understand statistics

You're a GED toting buffoon.

No trust me, you don't have a clue about statistics, lol. That's why educated people consider global warming a fact, and there are tons of dumbasses in the general public that don't. You are not even in the realm of academia. You'd get kicked out of high school at this point, lol.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
How many climatologists do you think there are in the scientific community? Lmao!!! Especially ones that produce over 50% of their research for peer reviewed journals.

You have got to be the dumbest person I know.

Notice, in your GED world and answer to the question proving you are rank idiot gets the old troll two-step to: "statistics"

You are either dishonest or dumb. Which is it?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
26,862
Tokens
I'm not misrepresenting it at all. Your misrepresenting it by saying they lied about their peer reviewed publications, lol. You are really dumb.

Yes, you are misrepresenting it.

I never said they "lied" about anything, you imbecile.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,135,156
Messages
13,823,841
Members
104,183
Latest member
sorensen
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com