Gays refuse to use Condoms

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/24/high-rates-of-unsafe-sex-in-new-york-city/


<small class="post-date" id="day_24">June 24, 2008, 3:43 pm</small> Unsafe Sex Remains Common Among New Yorkers

By Sewell Chan

<!-- end post-info --> More than one-third — 36 percent — of New York City men who have sex with other men and have had five or more sex partners within the past year do not consistently use condoms. City officials said that statistic was one of the most troubling findings from a new report — titled “Are New Yorkers Having Safe Sex?” — that was released on Tuesday by the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
The report comes just a few months after the city warned about an alarming increase in H.I.V. infections among young gay men, which has occurred even as overall H.I.V. infection rates and AIDS deaths have declined.
The report [pdf] was based on a telephone survey of 10,000 residents conducted by the department’s Bureau of Epidemiology Services. It contained an array of facts about the sexual practices of New Yorkers. Among the most notable findings, as organized by topic:
General Sexual Activity
  • Nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of adult New Yorkers reported being sexually active in 2006, and one in nine said they had had two or more sex partners.
  • Over all, 11 percent of New Yorkers, or 610,000 adults, report having more than one partner in the past year.
  • Men are three times more likely than women to report multiple partners (17 percent vs. 6 percent).
  • Young adults (18 to 24 years old) are four times as likely as older adults (45 and older) — 25 percent vs. 6 percent — to report having multiple partners.
  • Asian adults were less likely to report having multiple sex partners than any other ethnic or racial group.
  • New Yorkers with same-sex partners are nearly three times as likely (33 percent versus 13 percent) as those with opposite-sex partners to report having more than one partner in the past year.
  • Five percent of New Yorkers who are married or in steady relationships say they’ve had two or more partners in the past year.
  • Men who have sex with men were more likely to have five or more sex partners in the past year than men who have sex with only women (23 percent vs. 6 percent).
Contraception and Condom Use
  • Only 60 percent of New Yorkers with multiple partners reported using a condom the last time they had sex. The proportion is even lower – 43 percent – among New Yorkers who are in committed relationships but have had other partners during the past year.
  • Reported condom use is similar between women and men (62 percent vs. 61 percent).
  • Condom use is higher among younger New Yorkers (18 to 24) was higher than among older age groups.
  • Hispanic adults are more likely to have used a condom the last time they had sex than white adults (66 percent vs. 55 percent).
  • Only about half of men with both male and female partners (55 percent) reported consistent condom use. Among men who have sex exclusively with other men, 75 percent said they always use condoms.
  • One third of women (34 percent) used a condom as their only form of contraception the last time they had sex.
  • Only 7 percent of women of reproductive age used both a hormonal method — like the birth control pill, shot or implant, the patch or the vaginal ring — and a condom the last time they had sex. Officials recommends using two methods of contraception as the most effective way to prevent pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections.
  • Few women (8 percent) and even fewer men (5 percent) of reproductive age reported receiving information, counseling, or prescriptions for emergency contraception in the past year.
Pregnancies and Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  • In 2006, more than half of all New York City pregnancies were unplanned.
  • In 2006, more than 60,000 new sexually transmitted infections were reported – including 3,745 new H.I.V. diagnoses.
Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, the city’s health commissioner, said in a statement:
Tens of thousands of New Yorkers put themselves at risk by having unsafe sex. Reducing your number of sexual partners, and using condoms correctly and consistently, makes it less likely you’ll get a sexually transmitted infection such as H.I.V. Of most concern, among men who have sex with men who had 5 or more partners in the past year, 36 percent did not use condoms consistently. This is a core group which is at high risk for getting – and spreading – H.I.V.




<!-- end post-content -->
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
http://www.southernvoice.com/2007/10-26/news/localnews/7613.cfm


<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td align="top">Death of the condom
Are gay young people no longer 'Strapping up'?

</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="photo" valign="bottom">By RYAN LEE
OCT. 26, 2007</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">
spacer.gif
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <table width="251" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="center"><!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --> <script type="text/javascript">addthis_pub = 'windowmedia'; addthis_options = 'favorites, email, digg, delicious, myspace, facebook, google, live, more'; addthis_brand = 'SOVO.com';</script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/152/addthis_widget.js"></script> <!-- AddThis Button END --></td></tr> <tr> <td><table class="moreTable" width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0" height="0"><tbody><tr> <td valign="top" align="center">More from this author
RYAN LEE </td> </tr> </tbody></table></td> </tr> <tr> <td><table class="moreTable" width="100%" cellpadding="11" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td> Sound Off! about this article
Printer-friendly
E-Mail this story
mailbox-icon.gif
Letter to the Editor
</td> </tr> </tbody></table></td> </tr> </tbody></table> <table border="1" bordercolor="#660099" cellpadding="5"> <tbody> <tr> <td> Editor’s Note: This is the first in a two-part series taking a frank look at gay sex, condom use and HIV prevention. Next week: Are generations of gay men who endured the height of the AIDS epidemic no longer committed to using condoms?</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

There was once a time, in the not too distant past, when there wasn’t a gay social function — whether held at a club, community center or festival — that didn’t stock condoms seemingly by the truckload.
There was once a time, in the not too distant past, when many gay men — older men, teens, even gay porn stars — wouldn’t think about having unprotected sex, particularly with casual sex.

Times have changed.
Jay Dempsey runs the P.O.O.L. program for gay men at AID Atlanta, and begins each new group by asking attendees whether condom use is still the sexual norm among local gay men.

“The answer’s always no,” Dempsey said.
The change in gay men’s views toward condoms is often associated with the onset of highly effective anti-AIDS drugs in the mid-’90s, when the perception of the disease transformed from an automatic death sentence to an almost invisible, manageable illness. Experts agree that no longer seeing friends suffer or die from AIDS has affected how gay men approach safer sex, but other factors have changed as well.

The condom-friendly sex education of the ’90s has been replaced wholesale by the Bush administration’s devotion to abstinence-until-marriage, while, simultaneously, marriage has become a legal impossibility for most gay and lesbian Americans. And as gay people fight for rights and acceptance from society at-large, many continue to struggle with self acceptance, tensions with their families and creating healthy intimate relationships.

“If you have this feeling of yourself as not being worthy, perhaps you don’t really care about yourself, you don’t care about your health, and so you might not use a condom,” said Celia Lescano, a researcher at Brown University who studies condom use among young people.

And then there are gay men who believe wearing a condom is futile. “There’s a deep linkage in the minds of some gay people that if you’re gay, you’ll inevitably get HIV,” said Donna Futterman, professor of clinical pediatrics and director of the Adolescent AIDS program at the Children’s Hospital at Montefiore in New York.
'OUTSMART THE SYSTEM'
Colton Fitzgerald thought he could navigate HIV/AIDS as successfully as he navigated being an openly gay teenager in Loganville, Ga., a small town of about 9,000 residents located 35 miles east of Atlanta.

Before and after he came out as gay at age 13, Fitzgerald was bombarded with messages from his family, school and church about homosexuality being dirty and sinful.

“Where I grew up, I always heard gay is wrong, and all gays have HIV,” said Fitzgerald, who is now 18. But Fitzgerald persevered as the only gay teenager at his high school, and finally discovered a more accepting environment when he attended his first Atlanta Gay Pride festival in June 2005.

As he began frequenting gay venues and indulging in promiscuous sex, Fitzgerald developed a crude HIV-detection system that he thought would keep him safe. His screening process led him to start a relationship and have unprotected sex with a boy he met at a birthday party in early June 2006.
Fitzgerald had never seen the young man before, which he interpreted as a good sign.

“I figured he was somewhat of a new person who hadn’t been around the block,” said Fitzgerald, who had a three-and-a-half week relationship with the young man. Three months later, on Sept. 17, 2006, Fitzgerald tested HIV-positive at age 17. “I never felt like I was Superman, I just felt like I could outsmart the system,” he said. “I always felt like it definitely could happen to me, but I thought I could figure out a certain method of how it was dispersed by people.

“It’s definitely something I was not expecting, especially this early in my life,” Fitzgerald added.

The HIV rate for gay and bisexual men 13-24 years old declined by 30 percent from 1994 to 1998, but skyrocketed 41 percent from 1999 to 2003, according to a 10-year analysis of HIV diagnosis among youth ages 13-24 conducted by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention.

“The study found that HIV diagnosis among young females declined steadily from 1994-2003 in every racial/ethnic and age group,” said CDC spokesperson Jennifer Ruth. “Among young males, however, an initial decline was offset by significant increases in more recent years, driven primarily by increases among young adult [ages 20-24] men who have sex with men.”

The CDC notes that although HIV diagnoses are on the rise among gay youth, studies “indicate that teens are making more responsible decisions about sex,” with more teens delaying sex, or using a condom more often.

In a June 2006 CDC report, 53 percent of gay men ages 18-24 who engaged in anal sex said they didn’t use condoms with their primary sex partner, and 31 percent said they didn’t use condoms with casual partners. Both of those percentages were the lowest of any age group, with 63 percent of gay men over 55 not using condoms with their primary sex partners, and 42 percent not using condoms with casual partners.
'WHY DO WE NEED TO WEAR CONDOMS?'
The numbers suggesting steady condom use among gay youth don’t harmonize with 23-year-old Kelvin Barlow’s experiences in Atlanta. “A lot of my partners are not thinking about condoms,” said Barlow, who was diagnosed with HIV at age 17. “I think I’m usually the first one to bring [condom use] up [in sexual situations]. Sometimes my partners know my status and sometimes they don’t — they just want to jump in the bed.”

Barlow believes a combination of ignorance and emptiness led to his seroconversion. “At that time I was the dumbest thing walking — I thought I was invincible and could do whatever and not get ill,” said Barlow, who was 15 and dating a 35-year-old man. “I thought I was in this relationship with this man who loved me, why do we need to wear condoms?”

Fear of disturbing a relationship — either by making a partner suspect cheating, or losing intimacy — is a common barrier to youth using a condom, said Lescano of Brown University, whose research primarily focuses on youth with severe stress, anxiety or other psychiatric disorders. Teens may also avoid using condoms if they don’t believe they’re available, comfortable or socially acceptable, Lescano said. Lescano’s research found that “psychological distress during sexual situations may precipitate risk behavior,” and with gay teens experiencing higher levels of distress than their peers, Lescano speculates negotiating condom use in same-sex relationships can be even more difficult.

Like many gay youth, Barlow was numb to the mental anguish he endured as a gay youth, substituting inner pain with sex. “They may not do it consciously, but unconsciously you’re going out, looking for some … validation,” Barlow said. “We’re so broken apart because of society, and it’s taken a lot of validation away.”

Latex condoms have been around since 1912, and have been the primary weapon to in the fight against HIV/AIDS for more than 25 years. Companies like Coca-Cola launch new advertising campaigns every few years to capture new generations of youth, while the wear-a-condom-to-avoid-AIDS message hasn’t been modified in decades, Children’s Hospital’s Futterman said.

“Unless we give each generation the message with the same kind of passion, intensity and updatedness, [youth] are not going to get it, they’re not going to believe it’s for them,” said Futterman, author of “Lesbian & Gay Youth Care & Counseling.” HIV-prevention strategies must address “the interaction of so many forces” that prevent gay youth from using a condom, including various mental health stressors, Futterman said.

“We can’t isolate one factor [that causes unsafe sex] and so our approaches have to be multi-factoral,” said Futterman, who added that a societal taboo about condoms prevents them from appearing in commercials, movies, music and all other mass media. “If condoms are just in the public health sphere, and not in the real world sphere, why should young people think condoms are for them?” Futterman said.
SEX MIS-EDUCATION
Condoms also rarely appear in sex education classes across the country, particularly in Georgia. A growing number of states are beginning to refuse federal funding for sex education because they don’t want their content restricted by President Bush’s abstinence-only mandates, with New York joining 11 other states last month in rejecting federal abstinence funding. The Georgia Department of Education adhered to an abstinence-until-marriage policy for sex education classes even before Bush took office, with local school boards and parents having to “develop procedures that come into compliance” with the department’s guidelines, said Matt Cardoza, a spokesperson for the Department of Education.

“Of course, the distribution of condoms, I guess, goes against what the [department] policy says,” Cardoza said. Sex education classes in Loganville were vague and useless when Fitzgerald was in school.
“During our sex education, they, No. 1, never talked about gay sex, and No. 2, they never talked about having sex and using condoms,” Fitzgerald said.

With abstinence-until-marriage messages contradicted by constitutional same-sex marriage bans, gay youth “are basically told their very existence is not accepted,” said Futterman. Even sex education programs that talk explicitly about sex may not resonate with gay students, Lescano said.
“Kids who self-identify as gay, and who are out and know that, do need interventions that are specific to them,” Lescano said.

AID Atlanta works with schools through its “Ask Us” program to bring young HIV-positive speakers to talk with their peers. “If a young person can deliver their story to young people and say, ‘This is what it’s like dealing with this disease — yes, I may look healthy but this is what I deal with,’ that in itself is a powerful prevention tool,” Dempsey said.

But despite condoms not being in vogue, “until we discover a better tool, this is the tool we have and must use,” Futterman said.
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
Google the term "gay bug catcher". There is a subset of this society that wants to catch HIV. They figure that the worry and effort of preventing the disease is actually worse than contracting it.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Makes it hard for me to feel sorry for these idiots when they
get AIDS/HIV.

Because New York represents the world??? And furthermore where are the stats on heterosexual New Yorkers? Unreal.

:103631605
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
Because New York represents the world??? And furthermore where are the stats on heterosexual New Yorkers? Unreal.

:103631605

Fletch, I'll find the article I read last night that shows that this
behavior is common to the gay community in general.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
You and i both know that your thread title was purely hyperbole and that your trying to start some drama with this headline: "Gays refuse to use condoms". I mean, why do they have more partners? Maybe because most people don't want them to be married and so therefore the laws are in place to not be married.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
Because New York represents the world??? And furthermore where are the stats on heterosexual New Yorkers? Unreal.

:103631605

Talk about 'unreal'. Read this Fletch, maybe you will change your tune.

"We all Forgot the Condom" Sept 2008 GQ magazine
David France & Tom Schierlitz

"Since 2001, the under 30 gay crowd has shown a 33 % climb in
HIV prevalence. Amazingly, the highest surge is among boys ages
13-19, who scored a 112% increase in infections. But it's not just
a relapse among the young. Men who remained vigilantly negative
through their 20s, 30s and 40s are suddenly contracting HIV in
their 50s.

The reason for these increases? Gay men are no longer abiding by the
one commandment that dominated gay life for decades: "Use
a condom every time." In survey after survey, gay men say they
have stopped using condoms. "I think the last rubber gay guys
used in this town was in 1985." Michael Petrelis, an AIDS blogger
in San Fransisco joked when I asked him about this trend.

Gay men say they feel cheated out of the full pleasure and intimacy of
sex, and many have come to perceive condoms as emblems of a
still hostile world, imposed on them by a culture that continues to
stigmatize gay sex. "To use a condom every time you have sex, for the
rest of your life?" says Daniel Siconolfi of NYU's HIV-protection
think tank, the center for Health, Identity, Behavior and Prevention
Studies. "That's a very, very big burden. That's a lot to ask of somebody.
And it's not being asked of anybody other than gay men."
...
Bareback.com , whose 33,000 members are devotees of condom-free
sex. "When I have sex with someone who is HIV-positive, I feel
a lot more free," says JR Billings, 29, an LA based activist who
contracted the virus three years ago. "I just prefer sex without a
condom on. They feel so clinical."
...
The World Health Organization issued a joint statement with the UN
AIDS office reiterating the need for "correct and consistent" use of
condoms. The problem isn't condom knowledge. The problem is
condom burnout. After a quarter century, people are demanding a
new approach.

______________________________________________________

UNREAL.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
You and i both know that your thread title was purely hyperbole and that your trying to start some drama with this headline: "Gays refuse to use condoms". I mean, why do they have more partners? Maybe because most people don't want them to be married and so therefore the laws are in place to not be married.

Wrong again Fletch. I was, and am still incensed at an article
I read in my latest issue of GQ magazine. Gays feel entitled to
unprotected anal sex, and the AIDS government research funding pours in,
out of my pockets.

My mom, my uncle and my grandfather all died early of Cancer - They
were not promiscuous, and unhealthy in their sexual practices. I resent
the fact that money that should be going to cancer research is being
funneled to the more "politically correct" AIDS research.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
<headline>VD on the rise via unsafe gay oral sex</headline>

<!--articleTools Top--> <byline>Jill Stark</byline>
<date>September 8, 2006</date>

MEN who have unprotected oral sex with other men have been urged to use condoms and get regular blood tests after a dramatic rise in rates of sexually transmitted diseases.
Sexual health experts say the rate of gonorrhoea and syphilis among men have not been so high since the early 1980s. A new generation of young gay men have heeded the safe sex message but are unaware of the dangers of unprotected oral sex.
Figures in the recent Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin revealed there have been 405 notified cases of gonorrhoea in the first quarter of 2006, 11 per cent up from the previous quarter and 54 per cent more than this time last year when 260 cases were recorded. Nearly 90 per cent of cases this year were among men aged between 17 and 70.
Rates of syphilis are also on the increase, with men accounting for 90 per cent of the 112 cases recorded between January and March this year - up from 23 cases at the same time last year. If left untreated gonorrhoea can cause sterility, and syphilis can lead to serious medical conditions, including cardiovascular and neurological complications.
Professor Christopher Fairley, director of the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, said 40 per cent of cases of syphilis he sees are transmitted through oral sex. "For gonorrhoea and syphilis the real problem is they increase the chances of HIV transmission," he said. "So if you're infected with syphilis, which gives you an ulcer, or gonorrhoea and you have inflammation, if you then have sex with someone with HIV you're substantially more likely to acquire HIV."
A separate study at the University of NSW shows 10 per cent of gay men under the age of 25 in Sydney are becoming infected with the herpes type 1 virus. The virus, usually associated with cold sores on the mouth, has morphed and is becoming more common around the genitals.
Professor Fairley advised men to use condoms until forming a regular relationship and both parties are tested.
The Victorian Health Department is working on a new strategy to fight sexually transmitted infections. It will be revealed in the coming months.
</bod>
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
HIV men 'having unsafe gay sex'

<!-- S BO --> <!-- S IIMA --> <table width="203" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr><td>
_40426179_condom203.jpg
Safe sex can prevent HIV transmission

</td></tr> </tbody></table> <!-- E IIMA --> <!-- S SF --> More than one in three gay men with HIV have unprotected sex, a survey says.
The University College London poll of 2,640 men in Manchester, Brighton and London also revealed a fifth of gay men without HIV do the same.
Researchers said it was worrying, and called for a renewed push to discourage risky behaviour, the Sexually Transmitted Infections journal said.
But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having unprotected sex with others with HIV. <!-- E SF -->
The latest research was carried out between 2003 and 2004 in gay clubs, bars and saunas.
<!-- S IBOX --> <table width="208" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td width="5">
o.gif
</td> <td class="sibtbg">
start_quote_rb.gif
Many of these men with HIV will be having sex with other men with HIV
end_quote_rb.gif



Michael Carter, of Aidsmap

</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <!-- E IBOX -->

The rate of HIV infection was highest in Brighton, at almost 14%, and lowest in Manchester, at 8.6%
Across the entire sample, one in three men who was HIV positive did not know they had the infection - a figure which tallies with previous research.
This was despite the fact that over two-thirds of these men said they had been to a sexual health clinic within the past year.
Some 18% of HIV negative men and 37% of HIV positive men said they had had unprotected sex with more than one partner in the past year.
Over the same time period, one in five HIV negative men and four out of 10 HIV positive men said that they had had a sexually-transmitted infection.
'Risky behaviour'
Lead researcher Dr Danielle Mercey said: "We have to renew our efforts to ensure people with HIV get early diagnosis and also look to curb risky behaviour.
"This is particularly important for younger men who are more likely to demonstrate risky behaviour in much the same way as they are more likely to drive fast or take drugs.
"It is only by early diagnosis and safe sex that we will reduce the rate of HIV."
About a third of new HIV diagnoses are gay men, with over 7,450 new cases being identified in 2005 - slightly up on the previous year.
But other experts questioned how risky the behaviour was.
Michael Carter, of the Aidsmap support group, said: "The results of the survey are entirely realistic, but before we condemn the figures we have to see it in context.
"Many of these men with HIV will be having sex with other men with HIV."
But he admitted this could have other health risks such as sexually transmitted infections and the small risk of a "super infection" - re-infection with a different strain of HIV.
Will Nutland, head of health promotion at the Terrence Higgins Trust agreed that many of the men with HIV were having sex with other people with the same status.
He added: "The new research also backs up other evidence which demonstrates the need for ongoing, targeted HIV prevention work with gay and bisexual men in the UK.
"The number of gay men with undiagnosed HIV infection is not reducing."<!-- E BO -->
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
One-Third of HIV-Infected Gay Men Have Unsafe Sex: CDC
12.03.07, 12:00 AM ET MONDAY, Dec. 3 (HealthDay News) -- Two new U.S. studies of gay and bisexual men who know they are infected with HIV show that more than one-third have recently had unprotected intercourse. In many cases, these men are engaging in unprotected sex with other HIV-infected men -- a practice called "serosorting," where partners with a similar, HIV-positive blood test status decide to forego condoms.
However, "we also found that almost a third of the men -- 31.4 percent -- said that they had had unprotected anal intercourse with at least one partner of unknown serostatus, and almost a quarter had unprotected intercourse with a partner who they knew was HIV uninfected," said the lead author of one of the studies, Dr. Kenneth Mayer, medical research director at Fenway Community Health, in Boston.
He and other researchers in HIV/AIDS presented their findings during a teleconference Monday, part of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Prevention Conference, in Atlanta.
"There are now more than one million people estimated to be living with HIV in the United States, more than ever before," said Dr. Kevin Fenton, director of the CDC's National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention.
He also noted that half of all U.S. cases of HIV infection still occur among "men who have sex with men" (MSM), the CDC's umbrella term for gay and bisexual men, as well as men who may not identify as such but engage in male-male sexual activity.
And, Mayer added, unsafe sex was strongly linked to the use of recreational drugs, particularly methamphetamine, and was 60 percent more likely among younger men than older men.
The HIV epidemic in the United States may, in fact, be on the rise. According to recent media reports, sources close to CDC statisticians say that the annual rate of new HIV infections in the United States may soon be bumped up by 50 percent -- jumping from 40,000 new cases annually to up to 60,000.
While not confirming the statistics, Fenton told reporters that a new method for computing HIV infections is being used by the CDC. "The new estimates are not final," he said, adding that the numbers "are still undergoing rigorous analysis and scientific review to ensure the accuracy of both the new methods and of the estimates."
New statistics on rates of unprotected sex among gay and bisexual men are more certain, however. In Mayer's analysis, researchers had more than 500 Boston-area HIV-infected gay or bisexual men complete "behavioral risk assessments." Three-quarters of the men were white, with ages ranging from 21 to 70.
The research team found that 37.3 percent of the men said they had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse over the past three months. In 41.3 percent of these cases, unsafe sex took place with another HIV-infected partner, but in 31.4 percent of cases the unprotected behavior took place with a partner whose HIV status was unknown. In 23 percent of cases, the infected man engaged in unprotected sex with a partner he knew to be HIV-negative, the study found.
Another study, this one led by CDC researcher Nicole Crepaz, found similar results. Her team reviewed data from 27 studies published between 2000 and 2006. The studies included more than 10,000 gay or bisexual men who knew they were HIV-positive.
"The team found that more than a third -- or about 35 percent -- of men in the studies reported having unprotected intercourse overall," Fenton said at the news conference. Again, "serosorting" was found to be widespread, with 30 percent of the men admitting to that practice, the study found.
Black gay and bisexual men, especially, have been hit hard by HIV/AIDS, but another study showed them to be more likely to engage in safe-sex practices than their white counterparts.
In another CDC study, researchers examined data from 53 studies conducted from 1980 to 2006. The studies compared the safe-sex behaviors of black and white gay and bisexual men.
"Across all studies, there were no overall differences [by race] in reported unprotected receptive sex or any unprotected anal intercourse," said the study's lead author, Gregorio Millet, a behavioral scientist at the CDC. In fact, "among young MSM -- those ages 15 to 29 -- African-Americans were one third less likely than whites to report in engaging in unprotected anal intercourse," he said.
Black gay or bisexual men were also "36 percent less likely than whites to report having as many sex partners as white MSM," he added. Blacks in the study were also less likely to use recreational drugs, such as methamphetamine or cocaine, compared to whites.
Other studies presented at the teleconference showed close correlations between recent spikes in syphilis and gonorrhea among gay and bisexual men and rates of HIV infection in this population.
And, in a finding that puzzled experts, another study showed that circumcision -- long thought to reduce HIV infectivity -- does not help shield black or Latino men from the virus.
All of the new statistics confirm that much more must be done, the experts said.
"This shows that prevention messages have to be continually refreshed, and responsive to those who are younger," Mayer said.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
<center> [FONT=verdana,arial]Unsafe Sex Practices On Rise
Among Older Gay Males


[/FONT]</center> August 18, 2005 - A report published in the Tucson Arizona Daily Star on July 18, indicates that older gay males in Arizona are beginning to give up any attempts to engage in safe sex. The trend is attributed to the widespread use of crystal methamphetamines, the Internet to easily locate multiple sex partners, and "condom fatigue."
A study of sex habits among Tucson's gay male population shows that HIV infection rates among older gays is on the rise after a decade of decline. In Pima County, Arizona, gays account for about 5% of the population but comprise nearly 60% of those currently infected with HIV. Of those, 70% are aged 30 to 50.
One unidentified gay in the study stated: "Let me just become (HIV)-positive, start my drug regime and then I can enjoy my sex life like I used to when I was young."
According to Halley Freitas, a local medical anthropologist, about 25% of gay men in Tucson suffer from severe addictions, depression, or other psychiatric problems and they will never be persuaded to change their sexual behavior. Another 25% are safe; the remaining 50% need "the right message in the right place to change lives."
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
Men with HIV 'having unsafe sex'


<!-- S BO --> <!-- S IIMA --> <table width="226" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr><td>
_44767033_-34.jpg
Some gay men who are HIV positive still have unprotected sex

</td></tr> </tbody></table> <!-- E IIMA --> <!-- S SF -->A third of gay men who know they are HIV positive are still having unprotected sex, a study suggests.
The Medical Research Council, which questioned 3,500 gay men, also found 40% of the 300 who tested positive for HIV did not know they were infected.
Dr Lisa Williamson said more sexual risks were taken by men who had been infected with HIV for a long time.
About 2,700 gay men in the UK were diagnosed with HIV in 2006 - double the number a decade earlier. <!-- E SF -->
According to the survey, those who knew they were HIV positive were statistically more likely to have unprotected sex than those who did not.
The researchers are calling for a more targeted approach to prevention - promoting condom use even among men who are regularly tested, and urging those who report high risk behaviour to be tested more than once a year.
Inadequate education <!-- Inline Embbeded Media --> <!-- This is the embedded player component -->
<object id="bbc_emp_fmtj_embed_obj" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="256" height="179">




<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/emp/2_3_3887/player.swf" id="bbc_emp_fmtj_embed_emb" wmode="default" allowfullscreen="true" name="embeddedPlayer_7467328" flashvars="config=http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/emp/config/default.xml?v10&companionSize=300x30&companionType=adi&preroll=http://ad.doubleclick.net/pfadx/bbccom.live.site.news/news_health_content;sectn=news;ctype=content;news=health;slot=companion;sz=512x288;tile=6&config_settings_suppressItemKind=advert, ident&config_settings_autoPlay=false&config_settings_showPopoutButton=false&playlist=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2Fmedia%2Femp%2F7460000%2F7467300%2F7467328.xml&config_plugin_fmtjLiveStats_pageType=eav2&embedReferer=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=gays+unsafe+sex&start=10&sa=N&config_plugin_fmtjLiveStats_edition=International&embedPageUrl=/2/hi/health/7466889.stm&" width="256" height="179"></object>
<!-- caption -->Will Nutland from Terrence Higgins Trust on action needed
<!-- END - caption -->
<!-- end of the embedded player component --> <!-- END of Inline Embedded Media --> Will Nutland, from the HIV charity the Terence Higgins Trust, said a recent survey showed a third of gay men had been tested for HIV last year.
He said: "What we don't necessarily want to see is an across the board increase in testing. We want to see gay men who are taking the greatest number of risks testing more often.
"Of course, on the face of it, it seems perfectly simple, but what we do know is that one-third of young gay men leave school without adequate safe sex information.
"We're not equipping those people for their future sex lives and we're not investing the way we that should be in HIV prevention campaigns across the whole of the UK in the communities who are most at risk."
New HIV diagnoses among gay men in the UK are higher than they have ever been.
The 2,700 gay men were diagnosed in the UK in 2006 represent about a third of all new cases that year.
The Terence Higgins Trust says funding for prevention work among gay men is under threat and that there is not enough discussion of the issue within the gay community.<!-- E BO -->
 

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
7,168
Tokens
Why do you care so much about this Uncle Fester??

Hits too close to home or something??

Just tell your partner "No glove, no love!"

Problem solved:pope:
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
Why do you care so much about this Uncle Fester??

Hits too close to home or something??

Just tell your partner "No glove, no love!"

Problem solved:pope:


I explained earlier in the thread. I want government funds moved
from AIDS research to cancer research.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
U.S. to Triple Global Funding on AIDS, Increasing to $50 Billion Over Five Years

<small>By Duane Lester • Feb 27th, 2008</small>
money-down-toilet1.jpg

Where in the Constitution does the House Foreign Affairs Committee find the power to give a dollar to an AIDS program, let alone increase the funding by $50 billion over five years? This is sickening:
The Foreign Affairs Committee’s voice vote on the plan to approve spending of an average $10 billion annually over the next five years came hours after lawmakers and the White House reached a compromise on some of the policy issues, including spending on abstinence programs, that had held up action on the legislation.
The bill extends the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which authorized spending of $15 billion total for five years for prevention and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa and other regions hit by the epidemic. That act, passed in 2003, expires in September.
Bush is going to sign this craptastic waste of money, because he is a compassionate conservative. Compassionate to who? The American taxpayer? Not in my book. He is no conservative where spending is concerned. This is just money down the toilet.
Foreign aid is already a colossal waste of money, but this is made even worse when you look at how much the world is already spending on AIDS:
In 2004, 21 per cent of all health aid was allocated to HIV, up from 8 per cent in 2000, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. It could now exceed a quarter of all health aid and is the only disease to have its own United Nations agency, UNAIDS.
In 2001, HIV/Aids represented 5 per cent of the burden of disease in low and middle-income countries as measured by disability-adjusted life years lost, a measure combining reduced life expectancy and quality of life. This compares with 3 per cent each for tuberculosis and malaria, and 6 per cent each for respiratory infections and perinatal conditions.
Are HIV interventions so much more cost effective to justify this disproportionate spending? Probably not. Comparable costs per death prevented are lower for immunisations, malaria, traffic accidents, childhood illnesses and tuberculosis than for HIV. Moreover, HIV incidence (new infections per year) has peaked already in Africa, a fact not widely promoted by the industry.
Now look at our share:
While the US has only 7% of the world’s population and has less than 1% of all HIV/AIDS cases, it provides more than two thirds of AIDS research funding worldwide.
So why are we tripling our funding for this disease? Why are we giving American tax dollars to other countries at all? I can only shake my head and say that the homosexual community must have a powerful lobby.
Now, I know there are some bleeding heart liberals out there reading this and they are wondering how I can be so heartless (or maybe this is what they expect from us heartless conserva-tarians). Let me explain to you why, using something liberals are allergic to - facts:
  • Heart Disease: The number one cause of death in the United States, 21 million new cases of heart disease are reported each year, with 724,859 Americans dying from heart disease in 1998.[5] The National Institutes for Health (NIH) will fund the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at an estimated $2.6 billion–or $3,541 for each death from heart, lung, or blood disease
  • Cancer: The second leading cause of death in the United States, in 1999 549,838 people died of cancer. The NIH expects to fund the National Cancer Institute at an estimated $4.2 billion in 2002–or $7,713 for each death from cancer.·
  • Breast Cancer: With 180,000 new cases each year, breast cancer is the leading cause of death among American women who are forty to fifty-five years of age. Each year about 46,000 women die of the disease. The NIH is currently spending $396 million on breast cancer research–or $8,608 per death from the disease.·
  • Diabetes: According to the CDC, seven million Americans have diabetes–the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. In 1999 64,751 died from complications associated with diabetes. The NIH has budgeted $450 million for diabetes research–or $6,949 per death from diabetes.
  • AIDS: By comparison, in 2000, 23,932 people were diagnosed with AIDS. In that year, 8,867 people died from the disease. According to the NIH Office of AIDS Research, $2.5 billion has been proposed for AIDS research programs within the NIH in fiscal year 2002, with that figure increasing to more than $2.7 billion in 2003. The current (2002) budget amounts to an astounding $265,591 per AIDS death. This figure does not include the public monies spent to treat AIDS through federal Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources (CARE) Act. Funding for CARE is currently $1.8 billion–an additional $202,999 per AIDS death.
According to a 2004 report, “In 2000, 4.5 million Americans were suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease. This number is expected to increase nearly three-fold to 13.2 million by 2050 (Hebert, et al.). By contrast, the number of people with AIDS is less than 400,000.” Yet the FAIR Foundation noted at the time:
NIH research money budgeted per death is $162,790 for AIDS versus $10,245 for Alzheimer’s.
We already overspend on AIDS. Stop throwing money down the toilet.
Call the House Foreign Affairs Committee at 202-225-5021. Call them and politely give them your opinion.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
I will cull out the most annoying stats:

While the US has only 7% of the world’s population and has less than 1% of all HIV/AIDS cases, it provides more than two thirds of AIDS research funding worldwide.

  • Heart Disease: The number one cause of death in the United States, 21 million new cases of heart disease are reported each year, with 724,859 Americans dying from heart disease in 1998.[5] The National Institutes for Health (NIH) will fund the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at an estimated $2.6 billion–or $3,541 for each death from heart, lung, or blood disease
  • Cancer: The second leading cause of death in the United States, in 1999 549,838 people died of cancer. The NIH expects to fund the National Cancer Institute at an estimated $4.2 billion in 2002–or $7,713 for each death from cancer.
  • AIDS: By comparison, in 2000, 23,932 people were diagnosed with AIDS. In that year, 8,867 people died from the disease. According to the NIH Office of AIDS Research, $2.5 billion has been proposed for AIDS research programs within the NIH in fiscal year 2002, with that figure increasing to more than $2.7 billion in 2003. The current (2002) budget amounts to an astounding $265,591 per AIDS death. This figure does not include the public monies spent to treat AIDS through federal Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources (CARE) Act. Funding for CARE is currently $1.8 billion–an additional $202,999 per AIDS death.
According to a 2004 report, “In 2000, 4.5 million Americans were suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease. This number is expected to increase nearly three-fold to 13.2 million by 2050 (Hebert, et al.). By contrast, the number of people with AIDS is less than 400,000.” Yet the FAIR Foundation noted at the time:
NIH research money budgeted per death is $162,790 for AIDS versus $10,245 for Alzheimer’s.
We already overspend on AIDS. Stop throwing money down the toilet.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Why do you care so much about this Uncle Fester??

Hits too close to home or something??

Just tell your partner "No glove, no love!"

Problem solved:pope:


:nohead::lolBIG:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,697
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com