Gameface - it's time for you to prove whether you are worth....

[IDENTITY]

Cussin It asked you this question:

Explain how pipe-dream suppy-side economic policy benefits us all??


It is my opinion that you know NOTHING about politics, the economy, world affairs, etc. You simply are a hard-headed republican who was bred to hate democrats. Please prove you are not one of those dumbya conservatives and answer the man's question.

Custtin'it - maybe you can rephrase it so that it is comprehensible for gameface lol

:biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh:

 

[GAMEFACE]

ID,

I'll be happy to answer the question after I see yours and azzclowns solution to our so-called ecomony woes. You blow hards never offer any solutions to any problem, you just critizes my positions. You first then I'll tell you what I believe, that's simple enough.

 

[IDENTITY]

lol answering a question with a question? that's a sign of no answer son. lol

didn't think so...

 

[GAMEFACE]

ID, lol, my positions are all over this board. I take it you're out of your league once again.

 

[eek.]

Game.


Can you tell us what the advantages of supply side economics are.

(interested in your opinion. eek)
(just lay out what you believe in dude)
right or wrong is opinion.

50 million died in ww2 so we could squabble.

 

[GAMEFACE]

Eek for you I'll say this. You people amaze me, tell me what you think of tax and spend. Supply side economics pulled us out of the Carter debacle. We still have greatest economy in the world and it's doom and gloom 24-7.

 

[eek.]

I'm actually a bit clueless on supply side economics theories Game.

Just give me/us a general rundown.

I will give you a taxes thingy afterwards. (I promise)

 

[cussin'it]

ID,

I'll be happy to answer the question after I see yours and azzclowns solution to our so-called ecomony woes. You blow hards never offer any solutions to any problem, you just critizes my positions. You first then I'll tell you what I believe, that's simple enough.

First, sheot-faced, the solution is not an easy one, not after 4 years of unraveling all the hard work and progress of the previous 8.

I already gave you step 1---pull the "shrub." His agenda is a major part of the problem.
step 2---throw out the Congressional bums that rubber stamp his buLLshIt.
This may include some Demo's as well.

Rest of the lesson later...:director:

And weez just criticizes yo posseetions cause you make outrageous statements without explanation or substance.

 

[stacilu]

Eek for you I'll say this. You people amaze me, tell me what you think of tax and spend. Supply side economics pulled us out of the Carter debacle. We still have greatest economy in the world and it's doom and gloom 24-7.

Okay, you asked for it. Where is your proof about "the greatest
economy in the world," this is just one of your off the wall
comments. No evidence, just bs.

 

[RobFunk]

i lied in the other thread about economy and game's point of views but i want game to step it up its what the fans want its your panel to talk game enough of this hey this is whats happening **** this is what my guys are doing crap

 

[xpanda]

First, I oppose supply-side economics. But, since Game is swimming in his own crap, I'll bail him out and explain it.

In a quick nutshell, supply-side economics espouses that supply will ultimately generate demand, rather than the Keynesian theory that demand and supply are intertwined, with increased demand leading to increased supply (I'm oversimplifying here, but this is basically it.) Supply-siders advocate low taxation, especially capital gains taxes, because this leads to an increase in investment, which leads to a increase in supply, which leads to an increase in competition, which then leads to a decrease in prices. This is why it is also known as the 'trickle-down' theory.

The approach is production-centred, rather than consumption-based.

You would be surprised to learn that Karl Marx has more in common with a supply-sider than he does a Liberal.

 

[RobFunk]

outandup became gameface and he became the best ever but hes flat out wrong on many issues

 

[eek.]

You would be surprised to learn that Karl Marx has more in common with a supply-sider than he does a Liberal.

Saw that straight away.
It sounds like a privatised version of a planned economy.

Gotta have a wee think about taxes now...

 

[eek.]

In a nutshell, taxes equalise the divide between the haves and the have nots and let Government allocate/pour strategic levels of wealth into the infrastructure of society.
This can be military, roads, welfare etc

The big advantage of this approach is they are not constrained by a bare cash return on the investment.(like private shareholders) and can invest in areas of infrastructure that benefit everyone and contribute towards overall stability.

On their own, a Government only or a Private only approach has too many holes and limitations.

The greatest amount of wealth nowadays, is created when we have stability.

(And yet curiously it is when we have a war that our greatest technical achievements seem to appear.
Mass Production and the atom bomb to name a couple.)