Fun Observations, Post-Gates

Search

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
couple of interesting cyber OPEDs in the wake of the Gates arrest story.

This first guy kicks ass....His message.."YOU prove it.." (rather than demanding "I" prove a negative)

===

<!-- Title and meta --> Gates Says What A Lot of Us Are Thinking: You Prove It!



Who knew the black man to get the most press post-Michael Jackson would be a Harvard professor? But the story of Henry Louis Gates Jr. is making for hot copy; Gates getting busted in his own home for being "tumultuous," "secretly reading," and for "general uppitiness".


Why? Why all this interest -- besides the curiosity as to whether or not the arresting officer had ever once in his life previously used the word "tumultuous" in a sentence?


I think it's 'cause the professor was putting into action what a whole lot of us were thinking: nun-uh. We're sick and tired of having to prove things to the self-righteous reactionary fringe which looks at life as one, big racial profiling traffic stop: Step out of the car Mr. President and show me your birth certificate. Ma'am, could you show me how being a "wise Latina" isn't going to infringe on my male whiteliness? This despite the fact the reactionary fringe is the one with the history of duplicity and infringing.


Culturally this "prove it" mindset dates back to the passage of the 1793 Fugitive Slave Act which put the burden on Freedmen to prove they were in fact not slaves.


You can imagine how the bulk of those cases went down in the 18th century.


Since then, people of color have had to be mindful of walking in too-nice of a neighborhood, browsing in too-swank of a store or simply taking a drive on a too-sunny day lest we have to suddenly prove civil rights which are supposed to be inalienable.


I have, however, just checked the calendar. It's not 1793 anymore.


To that end, how refreshing was it during his presser to hear the president say that the arresting officer in the Gates case acted "stupidly?" Now that that's officially out there, it's not for Gates to prove he was in the right. Let Sgt. James Crowley prove in this instance he wasn't stupid for placing a 58-year-old professor in cuffs in the middle of the day.


No, radical fringe. We're not going to prove anything to you anymore because we can show you our collective drivers licenses and birth certificates and our 17-year judicial records and any other documents or accomplishments and you'd just come up with another freak reason to deny, deny, deny.


Though you'll insist the black copters and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion real.


So, go on: collect in your basements and bomb shelters and fear chambers. Go gather your own birth certificates in plastic baggies and wave them around at your legislators. Listen to AM Radio so that the Masters of Yesterday's Technology can tell you what to think. The rest of us are above ground living in the daylight. You're welcome to join us.

Assuming you can prove you deserve to.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
<!-- Title and meta --> Henry Louis Gates Arrested for Stealing Quart of Milk from Own Refrigerator


Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates is back in hot water with law enforcement again today as Cambridge police arrested him for allegedly stealing a quart of milk from his own refrigerator.


"He was acting suspiciously in his kitchen, removing items from the cupboard such as a glass," said Cambridge police spokesman Ryan Slatson.



"When he made a move for the refrigerator, we pounced."
One day after President Obama was harshly critical of them, the Cambridge police force received a strong vote of support from the National Alliance of Stupid Police.


According to an official statement from the Alliance, "We will be always on the lookout for perpetrators trying to break into their own homes, steal their own cars, and forcibly remove quarts of milk from their own refrigerators."


============
:drink:
 

no stripes on my shirt but i can make her pu**y wh
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
4,571
Tokens
i do find it hilarious that in the first op-ed the author tries to make a joke about the arresting officers inteligence when in fact his lazily written piece is full of flaws that an academic would hardly be proud of. secondly his argument is hardly compelling and seems to based on a strong bias while spilling over to show his hatred for white america. classic pot and kettle.
 

Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
1,479
Tokens
i do find it hilarious that in the first op-ed the author tries to make a joke about the arresting officers inteligence when in fact his lazily written piece is full of flaws that an academic would hardly be proud of. secondly his argument is hardly compelling and seems to based on a strong bias while spilling over to show his hatred for white america. classic pot and kettle.

yeah. my point exactly. he accuses crowley of not knowing the meaning of tumultuous yet the author's own grammar is fucked. next....
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,123
Tokens
lefties working OT to protect their boys back, writing one piece after another to try and change something that they never address

The POTUS, a/k/a retard in chief, made race baiting comments that were below the dignity of the office he represents about an incident he admitted to not knowing anything about. He just assumed racism, and none of the silly little defenses anyone on the left has concocted has either proved racism was a factor or pretended the retard in chief was right when he made a fool of himself.

Of course, the timing for the retard in chief couldn't be worse, as Americans from all walks of life, except for the far left loonies, have wised up to his articulate speech consistently void of substance. In other words, they're beginning to realize he's nothing more than a bullshit artist.

Now this scares the shit out of lefties, and they do what the "compassionate left" does when confronted such a situation. They go on a mission of personal destruction throwing as much irrelevant bullshit against the wall as possible.

So predictable, yet entertaining.

swing batter batter swing
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
lefties working OT to protect their boys back, writing one piece after another to try and change something that they never address

The POTUS, a/k/a retard in chief, made race baiting comments that were below the dignity of the office he represents about an incident he admitted to not knowing anything about. He just assumed racism, and none of the silly little defenses anyone on the left has concocted has either proved racism was a factor or pretended the retard in chief was right when he made a fool of himself.

Of course, the timing for the retard in chief couldn't be worse, as Americans from all walks of life, except for the far left loonies, have wised up to his articulate speech consistently void of substance. In other words, they're beginning to realize he's nothing more than a bullshit artist.

Now this scares the shit out of lefties, and they do what the "compassionate left" does when confronted such a situation. They go on a mission of personal destruction throwing as much irrelevant bullshit against the wall as possible.

So predictable, yet entertaining.

swing batter batter swing

He was ask a direct question about the Gates situation because he knew gates from Harvard. It was ask during a press conference, so it was hard to duck it.

His answer was right on about what happend. The cop did a stupid thing.

The reason the President softened his stance is in the interest of political correctness.

Now you RWN started hammering on it trying to make it a racist action, and its not.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,123
Tokens
1) Gates acted incredibly stupid

2) Obama acted incredibly stupid

3) How not to be President of the United States

"Separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African-American and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately," the president said, eagerly engaging the issue of racial profiling, a concern earlier in his career that has seen little White House attention to date.
"That's just a fact," Obama said

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

4) I know nothing about this incident

5) Gates is a friend of mine

6) but it's a fact that law enforcement in this country is racially motivated and the cop in this situation I know nothing about acted stupidly.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

OMFG

:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):)

this is why the retard needs a teleprompter



 

They're still scrapin him off my stucco.
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
1,611
Tokens
The reason the President softened his stance is in the interest of political correctness.


LOL. And maybe because there was not one shred of evidence backing up his claim of racial profiling. I'm sure that may have had something to do with it. He even went so far as to call Crowley "a good man." That's probably because Crowley really is a good man.

In the end, you just have a case of a douchebag acting douchebagg-y and inconvenienced as a result. It happens everyday to someone regardless of race. Gates doesn't have a case for a lawsuit and Crowley doesn't have to apologize. This pretty much renders all opinions (including the pro-Crowley ones) about the matter as moot.

Game. Set. Match. Cambridge Police.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
He was ask a direct question about the Gates situation because he knew gates from Harvard. It was ask during a press conference, so it was hard to duck it.

His answer was right on about what happend. The cop did a stupid thing.

The reason the President softened his stance is in the interest of political correctness.

Now you RWN started hammering on it trying to make it a racist action, and its not.


Where have you been. His aids have admitted that he wanted the question asked because he wanted to address it on TV. Hello.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,542
Tokens
lol, to punter the presy saying "yeah, i don't know really any of the facts of the case but it sure sounds race related to me" is politically correct? hell, it's not correct on ANY level and even a feeb like yourself can admit this was his actions have been all politically incorrect...

but as you've been told all along, but refuse to believe, he's simply dubya with a slightly darker skin pigment. doesn't think before he speaks unless a writer does it for him and posts it on a prompter....for 43, he used note cards. no difference
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,891
Tokens
Gibbs all but admitted the question was planted...and Obama was coached on the response.

So not only is Obama a race baiter...but he thought about it first.

Like murder...premeditated race baiting is the worst kind.

Just no excuse for that.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Like murder...premeditated race baiting is the worst kind.

So now you're equating Obama's quip earlier this week with the actions of US military pilots during Shock & Awe??

tsk tsk

:grandmais
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,630
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com