And if he did you're probably the only one here that could decipher what it all meant.he doesn't have to release his income taxes, it's not the law, they're meaningless, it's just a reason for haters to hate
they're cheap shallow simpletons
debates should be about policy, but they're about gotcha moments because that's what feeds the fools
Ralphie Madcow embarrassed herself last night, proving once again she's a supreme idiot
what he has to release is a financial disclosure, which provides infinitely more info than any tax return can, but talking to libtards (who still insist they're moderates) is like talking to a wall
they're unreachable
it's genetics
And if he did you're probably the only one here that could decipher what it all meant.
debates should be about policy
what he has to release is a financial disclosure, which provides infinitely more info than any tax return can
Then why doesn't he? Given his numerous business dealings, all citizens are entitled to ensure his policies are not being made to favor his business dealings. Can't monitor and ensure ethics if his sources of income are not known.
The guy paid 38 million in one year and you are upset about what?
I think his business dealings are pretty well defined. Look for the word "Trump" in a business name and you'll be getting close.
Where was your outrage about the Clinton foundation? That was the classic example of using one's position for self gain (and to the potential detriment of the country).