I am going to conduct a little experiment with parlays. It is real simple. Parlay the Nationals opponent with either the Royals opponent or Rangers opponent or anyone of those teams opponent's with another team that maybe can't win on the road or is in some horrible losing skid (Baltimore) or somebody that is red hot i.e. Cleveland.
The idea is if you (or me) focus on Nationals, Royals or Rangers and decide which one has the best chance of loosing on that given day. All three of these teams are well under .400 and not likely to get any better.
If these three teams continue to suck, which they will, then on any give night you should have a great chance to pick one side of the parlay correctly.
First play
Cubs/Detroit Parlay $100 pays $136
Cubs have Zambrano on mound and Nats guys sucks, KC is decent at home but their starter is sucky and Detroit should win that one. I am covering these parlays with a very token wager.
I will keep a record, especially if it produces positive results. If the whole thing is stupid then it will go away.
The idea is if you (or me) focus on Nationals, Royals or Rangers and decide which one has the best chance of loosing on that given day. All three of these teams are well under .400 and not likely to get any better.
If these three teams continue to suck, which they will, then on any give night you should have a great chance to pick one side of the parlay correctly.
First play
Cubs/Detroit Parlay $100 pays $136
Cubs have Zambrano on mound and Nats guys sucks, KC is decent at home but their starter is sucky and Detroit should win that one. I am covering these parlays with a very token wager.
I will keep a record, especially if it produces positive results. If the whole thing is stupid then it will go away.
Yes Sprinky. Cubs down 4-0 in the 1st so experiment already sucking bilge water. I hate the fuking Cubs. Still early though. Even if Nats win this one then good chance they will loose tomorrows game so will probably come back with Cubs parlayed with somebody else tomorrow if that makes any sense.
As you know by now, the lovable loser Nats found a way to lose for me. Yesterday I accidently (I was drinking) Parlayed Cubs/Royals so I was stuck with it but since I am just screwing around I parlayed Cubs/Tigers like I was supposed to. If Cubs had lost I would have double fuked myself which is hard to do. To show you that good things to happen to dumb people I now have the following two plays.
Cubs/KC parlay 100 pays 260
Cubs/Tigers parlay 100 pays 134
No matter which side wins the evening game I am golden am I not? Needless to say I am a big Royals fan right now.
I love you Texans, where ever you may be...too bad our baseball teams suck.
Looking for feedback on the Parlay for tomorrow. Do think Nationals will be the loser again tomorrow. I could pair Cubs up with Blue Jays who have Halliday on mound tomorrow vs Texas. If Colorado wins tonight then I would like Reds with Harang pitching. Don't like Detroit tomorrow compared to these other two options.
Looking for feedback on the Parlay for tomorrow. Do think Nationals will be the loser again tomorrow. I could pair Cubs up with Blue Jays who have Halliday on mound tomorrow vs Texas. If Colorado wins tonight then I would like Reds with Harang pitching. Don't like Detroit tomorrow compared to these other two options.
Mets win. 5-0 L5
Friday Ytd 42-35-2 (+685)
Remember that the reason for me going to the one game card was so I could focus on particular series or teams. In this case it is the West coast games. Arizona is lumped into that group. Last two wins were Mets at Arizona and previous 3 wins were Mariner games.
Friday Ytd 42-35-2 (+685)
Remember that the reason for me going to the one game card was so I could focus on particular series or teams. In this case it is the West coast games. Arizona is lumped into that group. Last two wins were Mets at Arizona and previous 3 wins were Mariner games.
