I don't need to discredit it. I'm just saying Barronman does the same thing. Lots of big heavy ml favs he cashes. I'm not discrediting anyone from making money. But you talk shit like you are nice. Those nfl winners are also mostly ML plays lol. While you sweated out a Minneapolis miracle. I hit both sides of the game with that play lol. You are nowhere near my level. Pats -200 ml said everything to me. You know nothing.
What do you mean?
The Cavs have a wide disparity in covering the spread vs expected win probability. In other words, they win games at a much higher rate than they cover. They're a team that if you like them then taking their ML over the spread makes sense.
Their point differential this year had them as a 43 win team and they won 50, then in the playoffs they went 4-3 vs Indy despite being outscored by 40 points. That's over an 88 game sample.
And I didn't bet Cavs last night fwiw, just was saying if you say you like a -220 and the team proceeds to blow the other team out then good chance it was a decent play.
edit: oh I thought you were referring to me but I think you meant Patriots ML in the superbowl and are referring to a separate discussion I was not privy to.