Fox Network POUTS...Trump goes on.

[cloverleaf]

First, full discloser, I'm a conservative and Fox News watcher. The Network has gone panty about one of there host. Did not even cover Trump's Iowa speech on Friday night. CNN, wire to wire. (check the ratings) MSNBC Hillary Network some with dribble.

Fox pouting over a female host trying everything she can to overtake Bill O'Rilley is a mistake. This blond haired snake eyes AIN'T going to root O'Rilley out as much as she tries.

Fox...you are making a BIG mistake with the public you really don't understand.

 

[Enfuego]

First, full discloser, I'm a conservative and Fox News watcher. The Network has gone panty about one of there host. Did not even cover Trump's Iowa speech on Friday night. CNN, wire to wire. (check the ratings) MSNBC Hillary Network some with dribble.

Fox pouting over a female host trying everything she can to overtake Bill O'Rilley is a mistake. This blond haired snake eyes AIN'T going to root O'Rilley out as much as she tries.

Fox...you are making a BIG mistake with the public you really don't understand.

Full disclosure. I'm a conservative and a Fox watcher.

He's being an ass to Megyn Kelly and she doesn't deserve it. My advice to Donald is to get pack on topic and talk about the border, healthcare, jobs and foreign policy. His ratings go up when he does this.

He's just being childish now and not presidential in the least bit.

 

[razorbackpicks]

Does it really matter? If bang her and that is all that matters.

 

[cloverleaf]

Disagree Mr. E. News media for some reason think they are gods. Wrong! Kelly's questions to Trump were obvious 'got you' I'm fucken special looking for special ratings. It's backfired...she ain't being considered SPECIAL by the majority of conservative voters. Kelly's motive in trying to beat O'Rilley is comical, nothing else.

Miss Snake eyes will earn exactly what she deserves.....

 

[neverbend]

I definitely agree with clover. I told my wife before the debate that I thought Kelly
would try to make a name for herself and try to bring Trump down to size.
That she tried with that 'war on women type question' which one might expect from
Racheal Maddow on MSNBC. The question was answered in typical Trump fashion &
really backfired on Kelly & Fox. As even one of Trump's competitors said 'ask the man
a question that explains his position and his solutions rather than a 10-minute question
that describes him as the biggest bastard on the planet,” Megan Kelly tried to
do to Trump what Candy Crowley did to Romney, Since then Trumps poll numbers have soared & unless
I miss my guess, Kelly's reporting career from that point on likely will tend downward.
Here she was thinking she’s made a devastating point, she’s already figuratively turning
around to accept high-fives from her pals. Guess what there was & are not any coming.

However I do understand Fuego's stance. Look I thought Trump & Aisles buried the hatchet
about 4 days after the debate. It's obvious Trump won the brushup with Fox. Kelly
was sent on an unplanned vacation for a week & a half with Aisles probably thinking that
would be time for Trump to simmer down. I doubt his recent comments to rub it in was the
sensible thing to do. Why pick the carcass!

 

[Enfuego]

I think Kelly's question during the debate was more than reasonable. He has to quit alienating the woman voter.

 

[HacheMan]

I think Kelly's question during the debate was more than reasonable. He has to quit alienating the woman voter.

Does more than 50% of females even know what they're voting for anyhow?

Usually comes down to who they think is the cutest...

 

[Willie99]

I think Kelly's question during the debate was more than reasonable. He has to quit alienating the woman voter.

the moderator is a problem when she becomes part of the debate

I didn't watch the debate, but it's fairly obvious to me she thought she was at a podium, that's just wrong

the moderator's job is to AXE questions, and when questions ramble on it becomes more of a statement

she thought she was going to make a name for herself, she failed

 

[Willie99]

I find the whole PC movement nauseating, and when somebody starts talking about some "war on women" I politely smile and walk away. I have less than no respect for such poppycock.

I'm mockingly laughing at them deep down inside, just as I mockingly disrespect all the victim-hood mentality

I respect every person, unless they start with the "poor poor pitiful me" idiocy

 

[PatsFan1283]

the moderator is a problem when she becomes part of the debate

I didn't watch the debate, but it's fairly obvious to me she thought she was at a podium, that's just wrong

the moderator's job is to AXE questions, and when questions ramble on it becomes more of a statement

she thought she was going to make a name for herself, she failed

The questions were fine. One thing people overlook is Trump is #1 in the polls, he is an outsider who has changed his opinions a ton in the past and a record # of people tuned in largely because the media frenzy over him the previous 6 weeks before the debate.

He isn't running a private company with no public shareholders anymore, he is running for President. You get asked tough questions. She wasn't doing anything other than her job, which she is obviously one of the best at given her rise in a relatively short period of time.

I mean if you say you're pro choice, pro tax-increase, single payer, vote Democrat, love Hilary in the past then you are leading the polls and have no voting record to go on, ya think this might comeup at a republican debate?

He should deal with the scrutiny like a man and get back to his campaign. Not take to twitter to retweet some idiot calling her a bimbo or ugly a full 3 weeks later.

 

[919]

the moderator is a problem when she becomes part of the debate

I didn't watch the debate, but it's fairly obvious to me she thought she was at a podium, that's just wrong

the moderator's job is to AXE questions, and when questions ramble on it becomes more of a statement

she thought she was going to make a name for herself, she failed

Please, you'd have no problems with the questions if they had been asked of a democratic candidate. The questions were fair and he's acting like a big baby. Can you imagine Trump having to interact with leaders of other countries who are women? He acts like a child.

 

[raiders72]

Megyn Kelly definitely hit below the belt. Trump needs to let it go. He made his point.

 

[buddyboy]

do you guys watch Professional wrestling?

wouldn't surprise me if Fox is paying Trump to 'fight' with this girl in order to boost her ratings.

next thing you know she'll be fighting jon stewart in a cage match refereed by brian williams

 

[silver7]

I'm rethinking this whole 2016 election. I now hope all you moronic motherf*cking RW crazies get your wish & Trumpy IS elected, The results will be more disasterous than the 8 yrs of Doofus GWB & Satan"s twin on earth Cheney!!! NOT a fan of Hilary, but with this list of idiots the GOP is fronting, unless she really fucks up, it'll be a cakewalk!

 

[Willie99]

Please, you'd have no problems with the questions if they had been asked of a democratic candidate. The questions were fair and he's acting like a big baby. Can you imagine Trump having to interact with leaders of other countries who are women? He acts like a child.

please, just stop, my value system is and will always be consistent

I don't like moderators becoming part of the debate, she has just in case you didn't notice

I hate weak ass PC correct nonsense like some "trumped up" war on women. I can only surmise you value such nonsense, many people do, which is why politicians can do what they do and stay away from anything substantive (it's too risky don'tchaknow)

I hate the victim-hood mentaility, such people are just a waste of sperm

As for Trump, he is acting childlike with some of his own ongoing ramblings. make your point and move on.

 

[Enfuego]

the moderator is a problem when she becomes part of the debate

I didn't watch the debate, but it's fairly obvious to me she thought she was at a podium, that's just wrong

the moderator's job is to AXE questions, and when questions ramble on it becomes more of a statement

she thought she was going to make a name for herself, she failed

She became a part of the story when Trump made her part of the story. Her questions were reasonable and any journalist would've asked the same questions.

 

[vitterd]

Please, you'd have no problems with the questions if they had been asked of a democratic candidate. The questions were fair and he's acting like a big baby. Can you imagine Trump having to interact with leaders of other countries who are women? He acts like a child.

unfortunately many, Willie included, see everything through political eyes or bias eyes. If it was a dem he would be saying kudos to Megan for the tough questions.....same as if it was the NYG being investigated for deflategate, he would be calling Eli a cheater. Willie will never see this about himself though.....no matter how many times and how many different people point it out.

 

[MikeB]

I find the whole PC movement nauseating, and when somebody starts talking about some "war on women" I politely smile and walk away. I have less than no respect for such poppycock.

I'm mockingly laughing at them deep down inside, just as I mockingly disrespect all the victim-hood mentality

I respect every person, unless they start with the "poor poor pitiful me" idiocy

This was an excellent post Willie (IMO).

I see eye to eye with you here.

 

[PatsFan1283]

She became a part of the story when Trump made her part of the story. Her questions were reasonable and any journalist would've asked the same questions.

This is what people are missing. When she said the "war on women" question it wasn't from her perspective. I think because Trump didn't like the question, people took it out of context how it was asked.

It wasn't "Hey asshole, you said XYZ in the past, war on women much? Do I need to grab your balls and squeeze?"

It was "You've made comments in the past some would see as derogatory, your opponents are likely going to try to paint this as 'war on women', what is your response?"

I could've told him how to answer this question correctly in about 30 seconds, but he is so used to having 0 resistance to his comments that he just can't adjust fast enough. I think a lot of this comes from owning a private company. No business media questioning your initiatives, no activist investors, no angry shareholders, etc.

Is it a good question? Ehh maybe not but to be tweeting about her 3 weeks later is pathetic. The most annoying people in life are the ones who can dish it but can't take it.

 

[Enfuego]

This is what people are missing. When she said the "war on women" question it wasn't from her perspective. I think because Trump didn't like the question, people took it out of context how it was asked.

It wasn't "Hey asshole, you said XYZ in the past, war on women much? Do I need to grab your balls and squeeze?"

It was "You've made comments in the past some would see as derogatory, your opponents are likely going to try to paint this as 'war on women', what is your response?"

I could've told him how to answer this question correctly in about 30 seconds, but he is so used to having 0 resistance to his comments that he just can't adjust fast enough. I think a lot of this comes from owning a private company. No business media questioning your initiatives, no activist investors, no angry shareholders, etc.

Is it a good question? Ehh maybe not but to be tweeting about her 3 weeks later is pathetic. The most annoying people in life are the ones who can dish it but can't take it.

Let me add this. If Brett Baer had asked the same question that night, Trump wouldn't have attacked him for asking the question. He took a reasonable question personal.