Please note number of replies and views from the principle pages of August 7th 2003.
http://www.therxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc&page=2113
http://www.therxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc&page=2112
Please do the same for today August 7th 2008.
http://www.therxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc&page=2
http://forum.therx.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc
The only reason I actully thought of this was the recent trend of bumping old threads.
Clearly the threads this year are getting more replies and views now than they were back in 2003 (none topped 100 views) here at TheRx.com. I am not trying to say that what was posted back then was any more or less interesting than todays threads, just that we have more posters involved now than we did back then, which IMHO has to be considered a good thing..
wil.
http://www.therxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc&page=2113
http://www.therxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc&page=2112
Please do the same for today August 7th 2008.
http://www.therxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc&page=2
http://forum.therx.com/forumdisplay.php?f=100&order=desc
The only reason I actully thought of this was the recent trend of bumping old threads.
Clearly the threads this year are getting more replies and views now than they were back in 2003 (none topped 100 views) here at TheRx.com. I am not trying to say that what was posted back then was any more or less interesting than todays threads, just that we have more posters involved now than we did back then, which IMHO has to be considered a good thing..
wil.
Last edited: