Food for though.

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,857
Tokens
No, what's embarrassing is posting propaganda from a conspiracy theory movie that has been debunked and proven to be bullshit. Have you been on the Thrive's website lately? Looks like the got the same web-designer as the Heaven's Gate cult.

LOL you're really knockin it out of the park today Trumptard!! hahah

You are not just wrong, you are SPECTACULARLY wrong, Pavian.

You don't have an ounce of 'logic' within you. How could you, you voted for Obama - twice! A guy with ZERO experience in the real world. You put your faith, hopes and dreams in a community organizer! How "logical" is THAT?

:neenee:
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
A guy with ZERO experience in the real world. You put your faith and hopes and dreams in a community organizer!

BOLD claim only to be contradicted by your very next sentence. HOLEEE SHIT are you special little gem hahaha. Do they make you wear a helmet around the house as well?
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,857
Tokens
I don't have to trust them -- that's what PEER REVIEW affords me. When a vast majority of other scientists in the field AGREE with our own American scientists, I feel confident in their findings.

Thank you for posting your pixelated spline graph though. That's looks really official :):)

Here we go... "peer review" :missingte

Next thing you know, he'll be telling us Keynesian economics is based on real actual math!

:):):):):):):):):):)
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
Here we go... "peer review" :missingte

You're not really in a position to debate this anymore. Just a few posts ago you boldly asked "What does logic or proof have to do with Math"

No wonder you can't comprehend the science that is out there.

Seriously though, helmet?
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,857
Tokens
BOLD claim only to be contradicted by your very next sentence. HOLEEE SHIT are you special little gem hahaha. Do they make you wear a helmet around the house as well?

Wait, don't you mean "logical fallacy"? C'mon Pavian, say it!

Folks, he's baaaaaaaaaaaack!

:hahahahah
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,857
Tokens
screenhunter_468-apr-14-09-00-1.jpg


"I listen to smart people!" - Pavian

:):):):):):):):):):)
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Way to duck answering the question. You don't need to be a scientist to answer. What happened is
the term global warming became an embarrassment much like the current GND. Climate change was safe
to use because it happens every minute of everyday no matter where you live.

It's nothing more than propaganda. If you tell a story long enough the gullible among us will begin
to believe it no matter how utterly idiotic it appears to be.

And there is where you and I differ. I'm a deplorable and you're a gullible.
[/FONT]
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Here we go... "peer review" :missingte

Next thing you know, he'll be telling us Keynesian economics is based on real actual math!

:):):):):):):):):):)
Well the way things are going I'm almost considering taking a 2nd look. There doesn't seem to be the least of urgency about the debt.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Way to duck answering the question. You don't need to be a scientist to answer. What happened is
the term global warming became an embarrassment much like the current GND. Climate change was safe
to use because it happens every minute of everyday no matter where you live.

It's nothing more than propaganda. If you tell a story long enough the gullible among us will begin
to believe it no matter how utterly idiotic it appears to be.

And there is where you and I differ. I'm a deplorable and you're a gullible.
[/FONT]

I never called you a deplorable and I didn't duck the question. I addressed it directly. You can claim the switch in terminology is merely propaganda, but it makes sense to me.

Global warming = A means to describe the rising surface temperatures on Earth
Climate change = Casts a bigger net and includes Global warming as well as all the crazy, extreme fucking weather we are seeing as a result.

Serious question: Do you deny climate change entirely or just that humans are contributing to climate change?
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
I never called you a deplorable and I didn't duck the question. I addressed it directly. You can claim the switch in terminology is merely propaganda, but it makes sense to me.

Global warming = A means to describe the rising surface temperatures on Earth
Climate change = Casts a bigger net and includes Global warming as well as all the crazy, extreme fucking weather we are seeing as a result.

Serious question: Do you deny climate change entirely or just that humans are contributing to climate change?
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Are you really that stupid?

I already told you climate change happens every day and man has nothing to do with it.

Try educating yourself on how the Earth's axis is slightly tilted in relation to its orbit around the Sun.

That should only take you a couple of months to accomplish.

When you're finished then you can explain to me how man is responsible for climate change, global warming,
the tooth fairy, Easter bunny and cow farts.
[/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]I already told you climate change happens every day and man has nothing to do with it.
[/FONT]

Sorry, but you're wrong. WEATHER changes every day, climate is the measured average of weather over long periods of time. Even the global oil producers know what effect their product would have on the planet.

Why are you so eager to defend them?

In the 1980s, oil companies like Exxon and Shell carried out internal assessments of the carbon dioxide released by fossil fuels, and forecast the planetary consequences of these emissions. In 1982, for example, Exxon predicted that by about 2060, CO2 levels would reach around 560 parts per million – double the preindustrial level – and that this would push the planet’s average temperatures up by about 2°C over then-current levels (and even more compared to pre-industrial levels).

Later that decade, in 1988, an internal report by Shell projected similar effects but also found that CO2 could double even earlier, by 2030. Privately, these companies did not dispute the links between their products, global warming, and ecological calamity. On the contrary, their research confirmed the connections.

Shell’s assessment foresaw a one-meter sea-level rise, and noted that warming could also fuel disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, resulting in a worldwide rise in sea level of “five to six meters.” That would be enough to inundate entire low-lying countries.

Shell’s analysts also warned of the “disappearance of specific ecosystems or habitat destruction,” predicted an increase in “runoff, destructive floods, and inundation of low-lying farmland,” and said that “new sources of freshwater would be required” to compensate for changes in precipitation. Global changes in air temperature would also “drastically change the way people live and work.” All told, Shell concluded, “the changes may be the greatest in recorded history.”

For its part, Exxon warned of “potentially catastrophic events that must be considered.” Like Shell’s experts, Exxon’s scientists predicted devastating sea-level rise, and warned that the American Midwest and other parts of the world could become desert-like. Looking on the bright side, the company expressed its confidence that “this problem is not as significant to mankind as a nuclear holocaust or world famine.”

The documents make for frightening reading. And the effect is all the more chilling in view of the oil giants’ refusal to warn the public about the damage that their own researchers predicted. Shell’s report, marked “confidential,” was first disclosed by a Dutch news organization earlier this year. Exxon’s study was not intended for external distribution, either; it was leaked in 2015.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environ...d-exxons-secret-1980s-climate-change-warnings
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Sorry, but you're wrong. WEATHER changes every day, climate is the measured average of weather over long periods of time. Even the global oil producers know what effect their product would have on the planet.
Damn! You really are that stupid.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,857
Tokens
Damn! You really are that stupid.

Cooked up climate studies using a few decades of a data on a planet 4.5 billion years old. Hilarious!

The NY Jets were 2-0 against the Bills last year so I guess this means that trend will continue indefinitely!

economists > community organizers > Pavian's "climate scientists"
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Cooked up climate studies using a few decades of a data on a planet 4.5 billion years old. Hilarious!

The NY Jets were 2-0 against the Bills last year so I guess this means that trend will continue indefinitely!

economists > community organizers > Pavian's "climate scientists"
Yeah but he's going to take the W and move on. You keep thinking he's Pavian but I remember a guy who always claimed victory.

Just sayin.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
Cooked up climate studies using a few decades of a data on a planet 4.5 billion years old. Hilarious!

I wonder if they ever made a meme about ice core drilling or if could stop banging your head on things long enough to try and understand the science behind it. But, since you like graphs:

Screen-Shot-2019-03-04-at-5-03-04-PM.png


Graph of CO2 (green), reconstructed temperature (blue) and dust (red) from the Vostok ice core for the past 420,000 years Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_core#Ice_core_data

You'd be amazed at the research scientists are able to do with that ancient ice.

Here's another website about it with lots of easy to understand pictures and videos. https://icecores.org/about-ice-cores
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,857
Tokens
Dave, who is worse for this batshit insane party, the Islamonazi or AOC?

Granted these are as meaningful as UN resolutions, but still...

Politico reported:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi and top Democrats will take floor action Wednesday in response to controversial remarks by Rep. Ilhan Omar about Israel, the second such rebuke of the freshman Democrat from party leaders in recent weeks.

Pelosi and other senior Democrats are drafting a resolution to address the controversy, which ballooned over the weekend following a public clash between Omar and senior Jewish lawmakers.

The resolution, which is still being finalized, comes after a backlash from top Democrats who accused Omar of anti-Semitism for referring to pro-Israel advocates’ “allegiance to a foreign country.”

Omar’s remarks are just the latest in a series of comments she’s made that many of her Democratic colleagues say are blatantly anti-Semitic and must be retracted.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Dave, who is worse for this batshit insane party, the Islamonazi or AOC?
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]I'd have to say AOC because she commands a larger audience. Omar is just an anti-Semite. [/FONT]
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,538
Messages
13,460,494
Members
99,477
Latest member
ola3219
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com