Nothingburger aka Hamberder
Trump had over 2.5 years to "expose the deep state" yet bupkis.
Expect a "sternly worded" letter (to appease Trump) with 0 indictments. (maybe a weak ass count of leaking to the press)
All Trump wants is a headline and something for Hannity to talk about.
Trump had over 2.5 years to "expose the deep state" yet bupkis.
Expect a "sternly worded" letter (to appease Trump) with 0 indictments. (maybe a weak ass count of leaking to the press)
All Trump wants is a headline and something for Hannity to talk about.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 89,634
- Reaction score
- 4,092
Time time time, is on our side
Liberals like to control the narrative because if anyone gets to push back their house if cards crumbles
And only a liberal can create some narrative that the Fisa investigation as been ongoing for 2.5 years. Must be getting confused with their Russian Collusion that's been jammed so far up their asses that they'll be limping for decades
I'm not sure I'll be able to look at them with a straight face for the rest of my life. Their behavior is a life changing event, can't think less of them
Liberals like to control the narrative because if anyone gets to push back their house if cards crumbles
And only a liberal can create some narrative that the Fisa investigation as been ongoing for 2.5 years. Must be getting confused with their Russian Collusion that's been jammed so far up their asses that they'll be limping for decades
I'm not sure I'll be able to look at them with a straight face for the rest of my life. Their behavior is a life changing event, can't think less of them
Bupkis? He's been battling incessant deep state orchestrated attacks and setbacks (like Jeff Sessions.) Trump *still* managed to get rid of Jim Comey, Andy McCabe, Josh Campbell, Jim Rybicki (who has been cooperating with Horowitz/Durham, Jim Baker (cooperating with Durham), John Carlin, Bill Preistap (also cooperating), Strzok, Page, Mary McCord, Mike Kortan, Mike Steinback, Dave Laufman, Randy Coleman, Sally Yates, John Giacolone, Rachel Brand, and Trisha Anderson, and other deep staters. He put effort into getting many judges appointed to the right federal courts, and he got Barr appointed. Horowitz's report is done and will deal with FISA abuses, Durham is running a (now) criminal investigation and he would not have changed it to a criminal one unless he had enough evidence to charge someone.
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2012
- Messages
- 27,794
- Reaction score
- 4,172
Obama never thought Trump would get elected. Why not have people criminally abuse the FISA process, Hillary will not do anything about it. But Trump got elected.
It goes back to a handful of Deep State operatives who have been outed and criminal charges are soon to follow. You can just feel the hand of God at work.
It goes back to a handful of Deep State operatives who have been outed and criminal charges are soon to follow. You can just feel the hand of God at work.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]As much as this pains me to say I agree with your synopsis. McCabe, Comey and Rosenstein
are all major players. I don't expect to see any of them wearing jump suits anytime soon
if ever. Higher up the food chain are Lynch and Clapper who have already been rebuked by
Judge Rosemary Collyer who signed the 1st Fisa warrant on Carter Page.
So I ask again, Mr. Horowitz, what the fuck are you waiting for?
[/FONT]
Horowitz is not waiting for anything, he handed his report to Barr awhile ago. Durham apparently requested a hold on its release until he was done questioning witnesses in his criminal investigation that are also 'named' in the Horowitz report.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]My bad. I thought Horowitz had some prosecutorial powers granted him. I did not realize
he was just a fact gathering lackey.
Allow me to rephrase my question. So I ask again, Mr. Barr, what the fuck are you waiting for?[/FONT]
I would describe him as a very well respected Inspector General of the US DOJ. You've made it fairly clear you don't understand what his job entails but, as you might imagine, appeasing you is not in his job description. Calling him a lackey because he didn't run his investigation according to your personal time limits doesn't make him a lackey, it makes you a whiner. He did his job and he gave his work to Barr, get over it already.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Call me a whiner if you must. I think of myself as a individualist.
I see things through the prism of results not promises and so far I
haven't seen any results.
Barr and company may very well prosecute someone but until he does I
will continue to [FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]criticize[/FONT] him.
And if and when he does prosecute someone it better be a big fish not
a minnow.
I seem to irritate you with my opinions so let me be perfectly clear, I
don't care. You are the one that needs to get over it.[/FONT]
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 89,634
- Reaction score
- 4,092
John Dunham is a serious prosecutor, not a politician. When there's a serious ongoing investigation, every good prosecutor is tight lipped and asks those around him not to talk.
This is the way it's supposed to be, and this is a legal process we've all observed or should have observed many times over the years
When politicians hold multiple press conferences every day to spin what the latest witness says, that's not a serious legal matter. That's a charade, that's an attempt to convict through their media and mold minds in the court of public opinion
This is the way it's supposed to be, and this is a legal process we've all observed or should have observed many times over the years
When politicians hold multiple press conferences every day to spin what the latest witness says, that's not a serious legal matter. That's a charade, that's an attempt to convict through their media and mold minds in the court of public opinion
I'm sure there have been results that have been gained that remain outside of your prism. You're not irritating me, you have every right to not understand what Horowitz's job entailed and every right to complain that complex investigations into corruption inside of our own intelligence agencies, involving possible attempts by those agencies to remove a sitting president, haven't been producing visible results in your time frame.
