lack of details means I am lazy.
70% should make you skeptical.
Anyway this is based upon a situational analysis of 2 years of Tbeck's data based on power ratings predictions vs spread and standard deviations of those ratings.
[This message was edited by BigPete on October 14, 2003 at 09:02 PM.]
70% should make you skeptical.
Anyway this is based upon a situational analysis of 2 years of Tbeck's data based on power ratings predictions vs spread and standard deviations of those ratings.
[This message was edited by BigPete on October 14, 2003 at 09:02 PM.]
Legitimate questions all! Can you say charlatan. Actually anyone is free to post any # of pics, using whatever "system" he or she might choose to employ. Then the onus is on us, use it or not. So if the poster has hit on something all power to him Time will tell.
I like Big Petes systeym, I have been using it for years, especailly in college hoops, I am not married to the systeym but I do acknowledge it when I handicap, for example I dont like Tulsa, but I love Army with their new coach, only upside with Army, you will go 2-2 at the worst with them, and maybe 3-1. Oregon State has a great coach in Mike Riley despite his critics, Chargers for sure should have keep him.
This is the same system I highlighted last year. No magic, not a ton of plays every week. Sometimes none. This week more than usual, hence the words "finally".
Others have different ways of using TBecks numbers, this is just mine. These plays are the ones I think would fit into the category of 70% based on 2 years of data.
Situational analysis sounds gay, but I couldn't figure out any other words for it.
70% is a lofty number and is more likely to go down than up. But just in case, Im gonna ride it till she fails. I have a 50% chance either way.
Lets she how she does this week.
Others have different ways of using TBecks numbers, this is just mine. These plays are the ones I think would fit into the category of 70% based on 2 years of data.
Situational analysis sounds gay, but I couldn't figure out any other words for it.
70% is a lofty number and is more likely to go down than up. But just in case, Im gonna ride it till she fails. I have a 50% chance either way.
Lets she how she does this week.
I've been reading BigPete's posts for a couple weeks now and he does not seem to be someone just out for attention. He has given reasons for his picks. However, a person should not bet games based upon what just one person says. Research should be done into any games bet.
Good luck BigPete.
Good luck BigPete.
"not bashing. Just wondering why you have so many plays now. What were the plays for the last few weeks? why would they all of a sudden give out 8 plays?
Just curious. I generally think along your lines on many games. thanks"
No problem, There were basically not many that fit my fancy, this week is an exception.
I've been anxious to see how she does this year and believe these might cash based on past results.
I you are really interested in this, which I didn't think anyone was, shoot me an email at petesnutrition@aol.com. I would like to discuss it further with experienced cappers, number crunchers and possibly tweek it more in our favor.
Just curious. I generally think along your lines on many games. thanks"
No problem, There were basically not many that fit my fancy, this week is an exception.
I've been anxious to see how she does this year and believe these might cash based on past results.
I you are really interested in this, which I didn't think anyone was, shoot me an email at petesnutrition@aol.com. I would like to discuss it further with experienced cappers, number crunchers and possibly tweek it more in our favor.
