Fetuses Have Memories

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,999
Tokens
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/16/fetuses-found-to-have-memories/
Fetuses found to have memories

By Jennifer Harper (Contact) | Thursday, July 16, 2009

They weigh less than 3 pounds, usually, and are perhaps 15 inches long. But they can remember.
The unborn have memories, according to medical researchers who used sound and vibration stimulation, combined with sonography, to reveal that the human fetus displays short-term memory from at least 30 weeks gestation - or about two months before they are born.
"In addition, results indicated that 34-week-old fetuses are able to store information and retrieve it four weeks later," said the research, which was released Wednesday.
Scientists from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Maastricht University Medical Centre and the University Medical Centre St. Radboud, both in the Netherlands, based their findings on a study of 100 healthy pregnant women and their fetuses with the help of some gentle but precise sensory stimulation.
On five occasions during the last eight weeks of their pregnancies, the women received a series of one-second buzzes on their bellies with a "fetal vibroacoustic stimulator," a hand-held diagnostic device used to gauge an unborn baby's heart rate and general well-being.
The baby's responses - primarily eye, mouth and body movements - were closely monitored over the weeks with ultrasound imaging to gauge "fetal learning" patterns. The researchers found that the babies acclimated themselves to the sounds and vibrations to the point that they no longer bothered to respond - a process known as "habituation."
"The stimulus is then accepted as 'safe' " by the babies, the study said.
The team also found that the tiny test subjects actually improved these skills as they grew older, with those who were 34- or 36-weeks old clearly showing that they had become familiar with the hum outside the womb.
"The fetus 'remembers' the stimulus and the number of stimuli needed for the fetus to habituate is then much smaller," the study said.
"It seems like every day we find out marvelous new things about the development of unborn children. We hope that this latest information helps people realize more clearly that the unborn are members of the human family with amazing capabilities and capacities like these built in from the moment of conception," said Randall K. O'Bannon, director of education and research for the National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund.
A call to NARAL Pro-Choice America for comment on the implications of the research were not returned.
The Dutch medical team, meanwhile, said its findings could help obstetricians track the healthy development of unborn babies during pregnancy. The research was published in Child Development, a medical journal.
Scientists have been curious about fetal responses to sound for decades.
The first real study of "habituation" occurred in 1925 when researchers discovered that fetuses moved less when exposed to a beeping car horn. Since then, door buzzers and even electric toothbrushes have been used to help researchers understand the fetal environment - and the response of the unborn to such influences.
Beeps and buzzes were not always the tools of choice.
In 2003, psychologists and obstetricians at Queen's University in Canada found a profound mother-baby link. In a study of 60 pregnant women, they found that the unborn babies preferred the voices of their own mothers - both before and after birth.
The heart rates of fetuses sped up when they heard their mother reading a poem, and slowed down when they heard a stranger's voice - evidence of "sustained attention, memory and learning by the fetus," said Barbara Kisilevsky, a professor of nursing who led the research.
The Queen's group has also investigated fetal response to the father's voice, concluding that if men try a little pre-natal vocalizing to their offspring, the newborn will later recognize the father's voice.


Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Dont try and tell Festus Zit that. It makes him froth at the mouth.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Ill bite here. Ill play devils advocate.
In 2003, psychologists and obstetricians at Queen's University in Canada found a profound mother-baby link. In a study of 60 pregnant women, they found that the unborn babies preferred the voices of their own mothers - both before and after birth.

Note this isnt surprising but what is surprising is this article trying to actually present this as a scientific case. Exactly how is 60 people statistically valid data when you consider a population of what 6 billion? Laughable and not even worth pushing any further.

Now what about this doozy...

The unborn have memories, according to medical researchers who used sound and vibration stimulation, combined with sonography, to reveal that the human fetus displays short-term memory from at least 30 weeks gestation - or about two months before they are born. "In addition, results indicated that 34-week-old fetuses are able to store information and retrieve it four weeks later," said the research, which was released Wednesday.

So how many are we talking about here? Because after all we know this OP is a "Vote Pro LIFE" guy, and ultimately this is where its leading. What is the segmentation for woman whom have abortions in the US?


IB_pie.gif



Out of said abortions, how many actually have memories? Its hard to tell when you consider the 22% of pregnancies that ultimately end in abortion, only 1.1% occur after the 20th week. So there is a 10 week gap in this 1.1% before these babies "have the ability to have memories". Hardly relevant in my humble opinion.

So its my advice if you are worried about those unborn, and rightfully it is a prudent and caring cause, why not take some stock in the born and go after those that murder children. Did you know (according to my friends over at http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils in America/Alcohol Kills/gadd.htm)
that in 2001, more than half a million people were injured or disfigured in crashes where police reported that alcohol was present — an average of one person injured approximately every minute? One third of these were children (ore one every 3 minutes). And how many of these were children murdered by drunk drivers? Think about that next time you wash one down at a ball game you hypocrite and might i add sinner.

Life is for those living and if your not able to survive outside of the womb, you aint living.

QUOTE%5D%20%20Note%20this%20isnt%20surprising%20but%20what%20is%20surprising%20is%20this%20article%20trying%20to%20actually%20present%20this%20as%20a%20scientific%20case.%20%20Exactly%20how%20is%2060%20people%20statistically%20valid%20data%20when%20you%20consider%20a%20population%20of%20what%206%20billion
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
slime mold....that's pretty much what abortion supporters think of the unborn....at one point, we were all slime mold

Actually in about 80-85% of terminated pregnancies, we're talking about an embryo, so there's actually a few ounces of solid waste that needs to be disposed of along with the admittedly slimy embryonic fluids.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
With regard to the cited study, it's hardly old news. The Japanese, among others, have demonstrated over at least the past couple decades that exposing fetuses in the final two months before delivery to classical music contributes to a faster learning curve for young children being taught how to play musical instruments.

Me? If I were young enough to still be in the fetus-creating game, I'd have to give strong consideration to reading the daily sports results (SU and ATS) each evening in hopes the little scudder might sooner be able to work the math neccesary to be a good handicapper and help increase my winning percentage

:drink:
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
I stopped looking at anti-choice photo links long ago, but I guess it's safe to presume that the abortions that RR posted are bigger than a palmetto bug?
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Heres one about the size of a Palmetto bug....But then.....Does it really make any diffrence? http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils in America/Abortion is Murder/aborted_9_week_fetus.jpg

Like I said, I don't look at anti-choice inspired pics.

But sure, size does matter. (barump-bump)

85% of abortions involve embryos that are pretty damn tiny and thus there's far less stress or medical risk involved for the woman. If for whatever reason she chooses to terminate a pregnancy in the later months, it's a far more invasive procedure and increases the chance of complications which could unduly harm her.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,826
Messages
13,573,594
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com