[h=1]Nickel Coverage: Five fantasy questions that need answers before Week 4[/h]Tom Carpenter, Fantasy and Insider
We finally saw Jeremy Maclin and Rueben Randle make some noise in Week 3, while upstart quarterbacks like Derek Carr and Tyrod Taylor continued to roll. Meanwhile, Devonta Freeman ran wild, while running backs like Lance Dunbar,C.J. Spiller, Jeremy Hill and Giovani Bernard left fantasy owners with more questions than answers.
What should we expect from these players in Week 4? Don't worry -- we have the answers for you right here.
Each week throughout the season, I will posit five of the week's most intriguing fantasy questions to a rotating panel of experts from ESPN, ESPN Fantasy and NFL Nation. Five questions for five analysts, thus, Nickel Coverage.
Responses this week come from NFL Nation Giants reporter and frequent NFL Insiders contributor Dan Graziano, Tim Hasselbeck from Fantasy Football Now and NFL Live, NFL Nation Dolphins reporter James Walker, and ESPN Fantasy analysts Jim McCormick and Matt Williamson.
[h=2]Which wide receiver is most likely to come through with another solid performance in Week 4 and why: Jeremy Maclin, Rueben Randle, Rishard Matthews or Marvin Jones?[/h]Four of our analysts are sticking with Maclin this week.
McCormick: I'm siding with Maclin given the stability of his floor. Maclin is on pace for 144 targets with a healthy 27.5 percent share of the Chiefs' passing targets and claims a respectable average depth of target of 11.22 yards downfield this season -- similar to stars like Antonio Brown (10.6) and Emmanuel Sanders(11.21) -- suggesting the conservative Chiefs agenda can't completely cap his upside. The Bengals have been generally stout in defending receivers this season, but we did just see Steve Smith thrive with heavy usage in Week 3. Jones might have the most inviting matchup, but Maclin is the safest bet for a WR2 outing.
Graziano: I say Maclin, since he's the best player among this group in a vacuum and he seemed to finally get things going in the second half of the Monday night game. Obviously, as Baltimore showed last week, you can throw on the Bengals, and Maclin is Alex Smith's best option if there's to be a big play in the passing game. I think Rishard Matthews is totally legit as a guy who's earned his opportunity and has a good thing going with Ryan Tannehill right now. But Maclin's the best of this bunch.
Hasselbeck: Marvin Jones. Cornerback Sean Smith returns this week, but Kansas City also received news that Phillip Gaines tore his ACL and is done for the year. Basically, the Chiefs are in trouble at corner as evidenced by having to play Tyvon Branch as the nickel on Monday Night Football. Not to mentionAndy Dalton is playing great right now.
[h=2]Considering their respective Week 4 matchups, how do you rank the following quarterbacks and do you consider any to be starters in 10- or 12-team leagues: Tyrod Taylor (vs. NYG), Andy Dalton (vs. KC), Derek Carr (@ CHI)?[/h]The consensus is that Taylor is the top play in Week 4.
Graziano: Taylor, Carr, Dalton. Thought about Carr No. 1 because obviously the Bears aren't trying to win, but Taylor offers the running element, which always boosts a quarterback's fantasy floor, and the Giants are the worst pass defense in the league by far through three weeks. I think he can pick them apart withCharles Clay and the running backs, that he can beat them with a big play or two and that their lack of speed at the first and second levels will keep them from being able to contain him when he leaves the pocket.
Walker: Dalton, Carr, Taylor. With quarterbacks such as Tom Brady on a bye and Ben Roethlisberger and Drew Brees injured, I can see a scenario where Dalton is a QB1 in a 12-team league. Some fantasy owners in deeper leagues are starting quarterbacks like Philip Rivers and Cam Newton. So why not Dalton? I really like that Dalton has an 8-to-1 touchdown-to-interception ratio and he's been sacked only twice. That means he's well-protected and isn't losing points with turnovers. Yes, we all know Dalton stinks in January. But who cares about January right now if you're a fantasy owner?
Williamson: Taylor, Dalton, Carr. Because of his running ability, Taylor (my preseason breakout QB by the way!) would be my first option here followed by Dalton, who, as anyone knows, I am not a fan of as a player. But Dalton, to his credit, is playing great football and has an outstanding group of players around him. Nothing against Carr -- and his matchup is outstanding -- but he comes in last in this race.
[h=2]Who is the better PPR flex play this week: Lance Dunbar (2.7 percent started in Week 3) or C.J. Spiller (15.4 percent started in Week 3)?[/h]
The vote was split on this one, with Dunbar taking a 3-2 edge over Spiller for Week 4.
Graziano: Dunbar until we see it from Spiller. There's no denying Spiller's talent or what he could bring to the Saints' offense if given the chance, but he's had some health issues and the Saints are a real mess, especially with Drew Brees' status up in the air. Dunbar was a big part of the Cowboys' plans going into this season. One of their coaches told me they see him as a mismatch versus defenders in space. And with Brandon Weeden in there, expect them to keep the passing game close to the line of scrimmage.
Hasselbeck: C.J. Spiller. I'm anticipating more work for Spiller in his second week back. More importantly, coach Sean Payton has said he needs more touches. I wouldn't be surprised to see him double Spiller's touches. I'll take that from a guy who has averaged more than 13 yards per catch versus better defenses than he is facing in Week 4 (Dallas Cowboys).
McCormick: Dunbar. With a current pace that would set a running back record of 112 receptions and more than 1,146 yards, Dunbar is doing what we had hoped Spiller would this season and is a better option this week. Sound the small-sample alarm, but Dunbar has been Brandon Weeden's top target and has five more catches than any other running back in the NFL. Dunbar isn't merely feasting at the line of scrimmage, either, as his average depth of target of 4.86 yards is second only to Washington's Chris Thompson among running backs.
[h=2]With Tevin Coleman likely sidelined again this week, what do you expect from Devonta Freeman against the Texans after his breakout performance in Week 3 (must-start, more of a flex type, Week 3 was a fluke)?[/h]
None of our analysts thinks Freeman is a fluke; all recommend having him in your Week 4 starting lineups.
Hasselbeck: I'm drinking the Kool-Aid. Freeman is a starter this week for me. I've always been a big fan of Kyle Shanahan and he hasn't disappointed down in Atlanta. The Falcons are balanced on offense and have a quarterback who can get them into the right run play when Julio is getting extra attention. I'm not sure Freeman reaches the 30-carry mark again this season, but I don't think he'll need to.
Walker: Keep riding the hot hand with Freeman this week. Houston's run defense is not good and ranks No. 19 in the NFL. The undefeated Falcons are rolling right now, especially on offense, and Freeman is one of the beneficiaries. Freeman is more of a flex-type of play after one good week, but I also wouldn't mind him at RB2, depending on the running-back depth on your roster. Freeman can be upgraded to a "must start" after three or four strong performances. But I wouldn't put him in the fantasy football Pro Bowl just yet.
Williamson: Freeman reminds me a lot of Ahmad Bradshaw and is in an outstanding scheme with a much-improved offensive line, as well as a great lead-blocking fullback paving the way for him again this week. I can't go so far as to call him a must-start running back, but I do value him as more than a flex play. So I guess he falls in that RB2 category for me.
[h=2]Giovani Bernard (53) has more touches than Jeremy Hill (42) and has done more with them. How do you value each Bengals running back in 10- and 12-team leagues for this week against the Chiefs?[/h]
Not surprisingly, the Bengals' backfield has everyone perplexed.
Graziano: I'm staying away from this situation wherever I can, because I think it's game-flow dependent and I have no idea how to expect this game to go. I know the Bengals still like Hill and see him as their starter, but Bernard has played well enough to deserve opportunity in the early going, so he's getting it.
Hasselbeck: I still prefer Hill to Bernard, though they appear much closer than they did before the season started. I anticipate Hill being a top-20 back and Bernard a top-25 back this week. With Dalton continuing to play well, the impact of Tyler Eifert and problems at corner for Kansas City, I'm anticipating more of a passing attack for Cincy, shortening the gap between Hill and Bernard in Week 4.
<article class="ad-300" style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; overflow: hidden; position: relative; z-index: 1000026; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; float: right; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
</article>McCormick: Usage so far this season seems to say Bernard's high snap and touch share could prove detrimental to Hill's fantasy stock, limiting him to just a touchdown-dependent RB2 asset if this deployment pattern persists. The matchup metrics suggest this week could offer Hill some upside, as the Chiefs have given up the fourth-most rushing yards in the league to running backs since the second half of last season. Versus the pass, the Chiefs have allowed the fewest receptions and the third-fewest yards to opposing backs over that same span. For this particular week, I'd rather have Hill in my lineup.
Walker: As a fantasy owner of Hill and/or Bernard, you're playing a guessing game each week, and much of it comes down to whether the Bengals are winning big (Week 1) or playing in close games (Week 2, Week 3). That is extremely challenging to predict. I think both are solid RB2 or flex plays until the Bengals sort this thing out. Hill has the potential to be a must-start running back, but not until he regains the full trust of the coaching staff (fumbles). That could take a few games.
Williamson: Bernard has the hot hand for sure, but Hill is still very talented, and I still think the Bengals want to remain a power-running team at their core. Very tentatively, I still prefer Hill in what should be a close game.
We finally saw Jeremy Maclin and Rueben Randle make some noise in Week 3, while upstart quarterbacks like Derek Carr and Tyrod Taylor continued to roll. Meanwhile, Devonta Freeman ran wild, while running backs like Lance Dunbar,C.J. Spiller, Jeremy Hill and Giovani Bernard left fantasy owners with more questions than answers.
What should we expect from these players in Week 4? Don't worry -- we have the answers for you right here.
Each week throughout the season, I will posit five of the week's most intriguing fantasy questions to a rotating panel of experts from ESPN, ESPN Fantasy and NFL Nation. Five questions for five analysts, thus, Nickel Coverage.
Responses this week come from NFL Nation Giants reporter and frequent NFL Insiders contributor Dan Graziano, Tim Hasselbeck from Fantasy Football Now and NFL Live, NFL Nation Dolphins reporter James Walker, and ESPN Fantasy analysts Jim McCormick and Matt Williamson.
[h=2]Which wide receiver is most likely to come through with another solid performance in Week 4 and why: Jeremy Maclin, Rueben Randle, Rishard Matthews or Marvin Jones?[/h]Four of our analysts are sticking with Maclin this week.
McCormick: I'm siding with Maclin given the stability of his floor. Maclin is on pace for 144 targets with a healthy 27.5 percent share of the Chiefs' passing targets and claims a respectable average depth of target of 11.22 yards downfield this season -- similar to stars like Antonio Brown (10.6) and Emmanuel Sanders(11.21) -- suggesting the conservative Chiefs agenda can't completely cap his upside. The Bengals have been generally stout in defending receivers this season, but we did just see Steve Smith thrive with heavy usage in Week 3. Jones might have the most inviting matchup, but Maclin is the safest bet for a WR2 outing.
Graziano: I say Maclin, since he's the best player among this group in a vacuum and he seemed to finally get things going in the second half of the Monday night game. Obviously, as Baltimore showed last week, you can throw on the Bengals, and Maclin is Alex Smith's best option if there's to be a big play in the passing game. I think Rishard Matthews is totally legit as a guy who's earned his opportunity and has a good thing going with Ryan Tannehill right now. But Maclin's the best of this bunch.
Hasselbeck: Marvin Jones. Cornerback Sean Smith returns this week, but Kansas City also received news that Phillip Gaines tore his ACL and is done for the year. Basically, the Chiefs are in trouble at corner as evidenced by having to play Tyvon Branch as the nickel on Monday Night Football. Not to mentionAndy Dalton is playing great right now.
[h=2]Considering their respective Week 4 matchups, how do you rank the following quarterbacks and do you consider any to be starters in 10- or 12-team leagues: Tyrod Taylor (vs. NYG), Andy Dalton (vs. KC), Derek Carr (@ CHI)?[/h]The consensus is that Taylor is the top play in Week 4.
Graziano: Taylor, Carr, Dalton. Thought about Carr No. 1 because obviously the Bears aren't trying to win, but Taylor offers the running element, which always boosts a quarterback's fantasy floor, and the Giants are the worst pass defense in the league by far through three weeks. I think he can pick them apart withCharles Clay and the running backs, that he can beat them with a big play or two and that their lack of speed at the first and second levels will keep them from being able to contain him when he leaves the pocket.
Walker: Dalton, Carr, Taylor. With quarterbacks such as Tom Brady on a bye and Ben Roethlisberger and Drew Brees injured, I can see a scenario where Dalton is a QB1 in a 12-team league. Some fantasy owners in deeper leagues are starting quarterbacks like Philip Rivers and Cam Newton. So why not Dalton? I really like that Dalton has an 8-to-1 touchdown-to-interception ratio and he's been sacked only twice. That means he's well-protected and isn't losing points with turnovers. Yes, we all know Dalton stinks in January. But who cares about January right now if you're a fantasy owner?
Williamson: Taylor, Dalton, Carr. Because of his running ability, Taylor (my preseason breakout QB by the way!) would be my first option here followed by Dalton, who, as anyone knows, I am not a fan of as a player. But Dalton, to his credit, is playing great football and has an outstanding group of players around him. Nothing against Carr -- and his matchup is outstanding -- but he comes in last in this race.
[h=2]Who is the better PPR flex play this week: Lance Dunbar (2.7 percent started in Week 3) or C.J. Spiller (15.4 percent started in Week 3)?[/h]
The vote was split on this one, with Dunbar taking a 3-2 edge over Spiller for Week 4.
Graziano: Dunbar until we see it from Spiller. There's no denying Spiller's talent or what he could bring to the Saints' offense if given the chance, but he's had some health issues and the Saints are a real mess, especially with Drew Brees' status up in the air. Dunbar was a big part of the Cowboys' plans going into this season. One of their coaches told me they see him as a mismatch versus defenders in space. And with Brandon Weeden in there, expect them to keep the passing game close to the line of scrimmage.
Hasselbeck: C.J. Spiller. I'm anticipating more work for Spiller in his second week back. More importantly, coach Sean Payton has said he needs more touches. I wouldn't be surprised to see him double Spiller's touches. I'll take that from a guy who has averaged more than 13 yards per catch versus better defenses than he is facing in Week 4 (Dallas Cowboys).
McCormick: Dunbar. With a current pace that would set a running back record of 112 receptions and more than 1,146 yards, Dunbar is doing what we had hoped Spiller would this season and is a better option this week. Sound the small-sample alarm, but Dunbar has been Brandon Weeden's top target and has five more catches than any other running back in the NFL. Dunbar isn't merely feasting at the line of scrimmage, either, as his average depth of target of 4.86 yards is second only to Washington's Chris Thompson among running backs.
[h=2]With Tevin Coleman likely sidelined again this week, what do you expect from Devonta Freeman against the Texans after his breakout performance in Week 3 (must-start, more of a flex type, Week 3 was a fluke)?[/h]
None of our analysts thinks Freeman is a fluke; all recommend having him in your Week 4 starting lineups.
Hasselbeck: I'm drinking the Kool-Aid. Freeman is a starter this week for me. I've always been a big fan of Kyle Shanahan and he hasn't disappointed down in Atlanta. The Falcons are balanced on offense and have a quarterback who can get them into the right run play when Julio is getting extra attention. I'm not sure Freeman reaches the 30-carry mark again this season, but I don't think he'll need to.
Walker: Keep riding the hot hand with Freeman this week. Houston's run defense is not good and ranks No. 19 in the NFL. The undefeated Falcons are rolling right now, especially on offense, and Freeman is one of the beneficiaries. Freeman is more of a flex-type of play after one good week, but I also wouldn't mind him at RB2, depending on the running-back depth on your roster. Freeman can be upgraded to a "must start" after three or four strong performances. But I wouldn't put him in the fantasy football Pro Bowl just yet.
Williamson: Freeman reminds me a lot of Ahmad Bradshaw and is in an outstanding scheme with a much-improved offensive line, as well as a great lead-blocking fullback paving the way for him again this week. I can't go so far as to call him a must-start running back, but I do value him as more than a flex play. So I guess he falls in that RB2 category for me.
[h=2]Giovani Bernard (53) has more touches than Jeremy Hill (42) and has done more with them. How do you value each Bengals running back in 10- and 12-team leagues for this week against the Chiefs?[/h]
Not surprisingly, the Bengals' backfield has everyone perplexed.
Graziano: I'm staying away from this situation wherever I can, because I think it's game-flow dependent and I have no idea how to expect this game to go. I know the Bengals still like Hill and see him as their starter, but Bernard has played well enough to deserve opportunity in the early going, so he's getting it.
Hasselbeck: I still prefer Hill to Bernard, though they appear much closer than they did before the season started. I anticipate Hill being a top-20 back and Bernard a top-25 back this week. With Dalton continuing to play well, the impact of Tyler Eifert and problems at corner for Kansas City, I'm anticipating more of a passing attack for Cincy, shortening the gap between Hill and Bernard in Week 4.
<article class="ad-300" style="box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; overflow: hidden; position: relative; z-index: 1000026; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; float: right; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
</article>McCormick: Usage so far this season seems to say Bernard's high snap and touch share could prove detrimental to Hill's fantasy stock, limiting him to just a touchdown-dependent RB2 asset if this deployment pattern persists. The matchup metrics suggest this week could offer Hill some upside, as the Chiefs have given up the fourth-most rushing yards in the league to running backs since the second half of last season. Versus the pass, the Chiefs have allowed the fewest receptions and the third-fewest yards to opposing backs over that same span. For this particular week, I'd rather have Hill in my lineup.
Walker: As a fantasy owner of Hill and/or Bernard, you're playing a guessing game each week, and much of it comes down to whether the Bengals are winning big (Week 1) or playing in close games (Week 2, Week 3). That is extremely challenging to predict. I think both are solid RB2 or flex plays until the Bengals sort this thing out. Hill has the potential to be a must-start running back, but not until he regains the full trust of the coaching staff (fumbles). That could take a few games.
Williamson: Bernard has the hot hand for sure, but Hill is still very talented, and I still think the Bengals want to remain a power-running team at their core. Very tentatively, I still prefer Hill in what should be a close game.