not true, there's a pattern here, and there's a reason Roger keeps everything in house when making these decisions
once again, evidence is not relevant in this process, the only thing that matters is Roger's power to do as he pleases, powers the players naively gave him in the collective bargain agreement in 2011. It's that union contract that carries all the weight. Roger is prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner.
If an objective third party ever considers evidence in these decisions, Roger gets admonished. See Rice, Peterson and even Brady. The federal judge in Brady's case ordered the release of evidence Roger was concealing in Brady's case and it proved Roger was lying to the public to convict Brady in the court of public opinion. The appellate court however overturned his ruling, essentially saying the evidence is not relevant, and they didn't consider the evidence. The only thing that mattered to them was that the players gave the commissioner the power to make the decision he made, and they ruled in favor of the NFL.
Roger wins because of the union contract, not the evidence. Roger will not be given the same powers by the players when the new contract is negotiated