Excerpts from Pat Buchanans new book.This is good stuff.

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN AUG 22, 2004 16:35:43 ET XXXXX

BUCHANAN BOOK DECLARES: 'NO CONSERVATIVE PARTY LEFT IN WASHINGTON'

After warning about the "Death of the West," bestselling author and former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan now declares: "There is no conservative party left in Washington."

Buchanan is set to launch his new work WHERE THE RIGHT WENT WRONG: How Neoconservatives Subverted The Reagan Revolution And Hijacked the Bush Presidency -- a work ripe with cutting observation and opinion.

RIGHT WENT WRONG is not set for release until September 1, but DRUDGE breaks the embargo on the book:

On Conservatives and Conservatism:

“There is no conservative party left in Washington. Conservative thinkers and writers who were to be the watchdogs of orthodoxy have been as vigilant in policing party deviations from principle as was Cardinal Law in collaring the predator-priests of the Boston archdiocese.” (Page 9)

“The Beltway Right has entered into a civil union with Big Brother.” (Page 176)

“Under the rubric of conservatism, the Republican party of Bush I and II has been reinventing itself into what conservatives would have once recognized as a Rockefeller party reciting Reaganite rhetoric.” (234)

“[A] civil war is going to break out inside the Republican Party along the old trench lines of the Goldwater-Rockefeller wars of the 1960s, a war for the heart and soul and future of the party for the new century.” (234)

On the Neoconservatives:

“[T]he boat people of the McGovern revolution.” (37)

“Kristol’s warning that neoconservatives could go to Kerry was an admission of what many have long recognized. The neoconservatives are not really conservatives at all. They are impostors and opportunists.” (250)

“Nine days after an attack on the United States, this tiny clique of intellectuals was telling the President of the United States...that if he did not follow their war plans, he would be charged publicly with a ‘decisive surrender’ to terrorism.” (48)

On the Bush Doctrine:

“[A] prescription for permanent war for permanent peace, though wars are the death of republics.” (6)

The Bush National Security Strategy “is the imperial edict of a superpower out to exploit its present supremacy to make itself permanent Lord Protector of the universe.” (26)

“This is democratic imperialism. This will bleed, bankrupt and isolate this republic. This overthrows the wisdom of the Founding Fathers about what America should be all about.” (35)

On the War in Iraq:

“[L]istening to the neoconservatives, Bush invaded Iraq, united the Arab world against us, isolated us from Europe, and fulfilled to the letter bin Laden’s prophecy as to what we were about. We won the war in three weeks -- and we may have lost the Islamic world for a generation. (84)

f Iraq collapses in chaos and civil war, there will be a ferocious fight in this country over who misled us and who may have lied us, into war....into the dock will go the neoconservatives whose class project this was...” (236)

On the War on Terrorism:

“Terrorism is the price of empire. If we do not wish to pay it, we must give up the empire.” (237)

“America’s enemy in the Islamic world is not a state we can crush with sanctions or an enemy we can defeat with force of arms. The enemy is a cause, a movement, an idea.” (87)

“[T]errorism is not a nation, a regime, or an army. Terrorism is a tactic, a technique, a weapon fanatics, dictators and warriors have resorted to through history. If...war is the continuation of politics by other means, terrorism is the continuation of war by other means.” (89)

“We are not hated for who we are. We are hated for what we do. It is not our principles that have spawned pandemic hatred of America in the Islamic world. It is our policies.” (80)

“U.S. dominance of the Middle East is not the corrective to terror. It is a cause of terror. Were we not over there, the 9/11 terrorists would not have been over here.” (236)

“Often, terrorism succeeded in the 20th century, and, when it did, the ex-terrorists achieved power, glory and immortality, with streets, towns and cities named for them....America today recognizes every regime to come out of these wars where terrorism was a common tactic.” (123)

On Israel & the Middle East:

“The Sharon Plan is not a peace plan. It is a unilateral solution to be imposed by Israel....A Palestinian leader who signs on to this surrender of land and rights would be signing his death warrant.” (242)

On China-U.S. Collision:

“In Asia, China is the rising power, America the receding one.” (127)

“As China is the one nation with the size, population, ideology and power to contest the United States for hegemony in Asia, is war inevitable? “Answer: No more inevitable than was war between Germany and Great Britain in 1914.” (144)

On Bush “Free Trade” Policies:

“It is false to say President Bush presided over a ‘jobless recovery.’ His trade deficits have created many millions of jobs in China.” (167)

“Free trade is the serial killer of American manufacturing and the Trojan Horse of World Government. It is the primrose path to the loss of economic independence and national sovereignty. Free trade is a bright shining lie.” (171)

Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak it name.” (173)

“The Republican Party has signed off on economic treason.” (8)

On Bush-Republican Fiscal Policy:

“Bush has compiled a fiscal record of startling recklessness.” (175)

“There is no conservative party in Washington. There is a Democratic Party of tax-and-spend and a Republican Party of guns and butter and tax cuts, too. Washington is all accelerator, the brakes are gone.” (177)

“Like Thelma and Louise, Medicare and Social Security are headed for the cliff. And we are in the back seat.” (187)

“Alongside the Gingrich Republicans, Bill Clinton was Bob Taft.” (191)

On Congress & the Supreme Court:

“The dirty little secret is that Congress no longer wants the accountability that goes with the wielding of power.” (212)

“How did it happen that a republic born of a rebellion against a king and parliament we did not elect has fallen under a tyranny of judges we did not elect? How did we come to live under what Jefferson warned us would be ‘the despotism of an oligarchy’?” (217)

“Though our society is democratic, our government is not.” (217)

“The Left has found the Ho Chi Minh Trail around democracy...to impose its views and values upon our society without having to win elections or persuade elected legislators. (223)
On the Conservative Case for Bush:

“George W. Bush is a God-fearing and good man....He kept his commitment to cut taxes....He has revived an economy sinking into recession when he took office. He has chosen fine judges. His willingness to accept international abuse by rejecting the Kyoto Protocol and the International Criminal Court show him to be a patriot who will not yield national sovereignty.” (251)

“If George Bush is reelected and the Senate that confirms new justices remains Republican, there is the chance...the curtain may be brought down on the court’s fifty-year run as battering ram of social revolution.” (252)

“There is simply nothing that [Kerry-led Democrat] party offers to the Right.” (252)

Developing...
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
I certainly agree with a lot of what he has to say about the War in Iraq and the Bush Doctrine.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
His time has come and gone because he won't walk lockstep with the current leadership for which one does not dare criticize.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
I think he would polarize the States worse than it already is. Extremly rigid in his thinking. Would lead the country in accordance to his religious beliefs. I would like to see a candidate who is not too far entrenced in either party or ideology. Someone who actually could instill sanity back into government and who would actually listen to both the left and the right. Someone who could possibly bridge this gap and get the bills passed that need to be passed before our country sinks further than it has. An apolitical candidate who is more concerned about the country than his own image. A candidate whose ego is smaller than his desire to serve.I know I am dreaming.
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Judge Wapner:
An apolitical candidate who is more concerned about the country than his own image. A candidate whose ego is smaller than his desire to serve. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

no one like this would even run, let alone win the presidency. think about the ego one must have to think he can run the greatest and most powerful country in the world.

i agree though, it would be nice to have a true servant at the helm.

i could be wrong but, i kinda think guys like washington and lincoln were like that.
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
Help!

Judge Wapner is into heavy drugs and is hallucinating!

He thinks Jesus Christ should run for president!
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
Lol! What can I say guys,I am an idealist.I do think Powell is close to what
I stated,but he will never run.
 

A MIND IS A TERRIBLE THING TO WASTE
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
169
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by truthteller:
For me he would make abortion illegal and clean up the borders. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Once again, you state that abortion should be illegal, and once again I will ask you what do you propose to do about illegal abortions?
Would you jail the mother? Would you jail the Dr? Would you jail the Father? If you would, what punishment would you mete out? Maybe life without parole. maybe the death penalty.
How would you enforce a women choosing something to do with her own body?
I have asked these questions of you before. YOU NEVER RESPONDED WITH A ANSWER. You must tell this board how you would enforce the right of a woman to choose??????
Enlighten us with your wisdom, truthteller.
Maybe you would do this to all who have a abortion in the first trimester>>>>>>>>>>
guil.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
Ron Paul would make a great candidate, but he would never win in a million years. He actually ran in 1988 (I think it was '88) on the Libertarian ballot.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
Sonny...I believe truthteller's world revolves around the abortion issue....I don't see him posting much except for "crying over birth control"....

I also get the feeling that if abortion was outlawed, that in truthteller's eyes, all the issues in America would be solved.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
It is truly amazing that 95% of truth's posts have to revert to the abortion issue.

my only problem with abortions is there ain't enough of them in this world. For instance, Barbara Bush should've had one some 50 years ago.
icon_biggrin.gif


So here's to you and the abortion issue, Truth.
toast.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
300
Tokens
The people who are the most vocal about abortion seem to be the first on the chopping block to eliminate or reduce funding for federal programs to help those women who choose to give birth. These right to lifers want women to have these children but then want to forget about them once they are born.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,932
Messages
13,575,404
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com