Intresting video with some correlation that's going on here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2kO_5cNF5k
what out you knowing all the facts...you are no more than a follower...why would you call me that...we have talk many times..
SF-3 +100...................................$700.00----lost
PHI+3 -105..................................$2625.00...lost
BAL -13 +101..............................$400.00....lost
TB-2.5 -110..................................$660.00....lost
Sea-5.5 .....................................$2500.00...winner
Sea under 41..............................$2000.00...winner
2-4 on the day +$115 on the week
on to week 8
Yes I am a follower. Many people who come to this forum to see picks for FREE, are all followers.
I call you that because you did not respond in any fashion after I simply asked for you to work with me until a certain date.
Maybe I was out of line by using such a word as scandicapper when referring to yourself. Although things seem to have changed since you have become a paid service.
I hope this view comes through as balanced and not in any way critical of anyone:
I get Ace's picks through doc and I follow the units that i'm given there. It's then quite discouraging to check this thread once the weekend is over and see a completely different result, which especially for this weekend is massively different (-6 units versus plus a few dollars). I realize that it could be completely the other way around on any given week (ie. docs plus and the $$ amounts here down), but it would just be nice, and probably much fairer if the same information was given to everyone. The Arizona under play this week is a good example. From the docs info there was no way we could known that this had the same $$ weight as the side play on the same game. At docs it was 2 less units and not from the 99 system.
Like and quarterback and his wide reciever, it would be great if we were all on the same page!