EWINNER - Why should I play with you?

[cincy_]

You and your butt-boy Fat Frank are not going to get anywhere by dissing Shrink. Every gambler here knows that if Shrink can't stand up to people like you, WE ARE TOAST.

It's not about how you have treated studbolt or any of the players - it's about the way you've dissed Shrink. With the attitude that you have shown, I know that if you ever take my money and tell me to take a hike, I have no recourse. Who can I turn to? It's not personal, but every gambler needs people like Shrink to be powerful. By ignoring his warnings and sending you my money, I am simply asking for trouble.

The only way we (as a group of gamblers) have ANY power is by sticking together and supporting the few people that will go to bat for us. I know Shrink will go to bat for me and I know that you won't. It's that simple.

So, if ANYONE asks me about Ewinner - maybe 2 weeks from today, maybe 4 months from today - I will tell them that there are a lot of other books out there that are safer.

So, for any gambler out there that has 5 dimes to send somewhere, let me tell you that if you send it to EWINNER and they come up with a rule that allows them to steal your money, don't come crying to the RX. Send it somewhere else. Send it to a book that will listen to Shrink if you ever have any problems.

 

[vegasguy39]

Good question..

Why would anyone one play with an unproven book..?? When there are so many great others.

 

[PatrickMcIrish]

You are exactly right Cincy! I thought they paid these guys the money they won! If they stole that money anybody who plays there is risking their bankroll. Sre it was some "bonus whores" this time but next time it might be you.

And for you EWinner, coming in to try and stir up a few naive RX haters is silly. Your a stiff book if you keep these guys money. You know it, I know it, and everyone else with a clue about this business knows it. It will take more than FatFrank and his anti-Rx bandwagon here to save you. Seriously. Pay what you owe and move on.

 

[TTinCO]

"So, if ANYONE asks me about Ewinner - maybe 2 weeks from today, maybe 4 months from today - I will tell them that there are a lot of other books out there that are safer."

I would have said that months ago, and I will say it months from now.

We still don't have all the details as to exactly what was going on with these well known professional players and eWinner.

Since when did a payout dispute equate to a public announcement that the book doesn't have enough money to cover it's current expenses?

Patrick, tell me that you wouldn't have been raging pissed if you were the book & had your advertising pulled like that.

 

[FatFrank]

>FatFrank and his anti-Rx bandwagon

Patrick is only the shell of the man he used to be... Remember T.O.P.?

 

[FatFrank]

>You and your butt-boy Fat Frank

LMAO

There are more of Ken's butt-boys here on TheRx than in San Francisco's Castro District... cincy_hugg and his other IDs lead the list.

 

[sickgambler]

.Man, this Fat Frank sounds like a bitter Frank..


Forget calling himself Fat Frank, he should call himself Mad Frank. cause he is one mad Fatty Frank...

 

[cincy_]

Fat Frank and EWINNER

The more you try to "win" this debate, the more you stand to lose.

Your mission is simple: You want more action at your book.

This argument is NOT helping your mission. Anyone with a couple of dimes to send will never take the chance of sending you the money. If you try to fight, and try to dis Shrink, you may win the argument, but you will NOT get the $2,000 that Joe Schmoe is itching to send on Friday.

It's pretty simple. You're not getting my money, you're not getting any of my friends' money and the more you try to "win", the greater the chances that you're not getting Joe Schmoe's money.

It's tough enough convicing people to send you their cash without having stuff like this to deal with. Especially since I am going to warn EVERYONE at EVERY singe posting forum that I know of about your stealing - and I do this because of your arrogance more than anything else.

 

[RedSox]

cincy_hugg,
I have been trying to explain to Mr. FatFrank for some time now that this is not helping their case. I have said it in another thread and repeat it here, if players tried to scam Ewinner and got caught, it will come afloat! If Ewinner tried and did screw players out of their winnings, it will come out! Simple as that.

 

[cincy_]

I think McIrish says it best in his thread. Those guys may have been bonus whores, but EWINNER is NOT a book I would ever trust with my money.

Now, if I had NOWHERE else to send money and Grande and Panam went out of business, I might want to learn if EWINNER was justified or not - but as it stands now, I don't care if they're right or not.

There is no reason to take the risk of having my money stolen.

 

[TheGeneral+]

Only reason I can think is if you want to live on the edge? I think i would rather invest in the detroit tigers to win the series next year than invest in Ewinner

 

[PatrickMcIrish]

>>>Patrick, tell me that you wouldn't have been raging pissed if you were the book & had your advertising pulled like that.<<<

Damn right I would be pissed and I feel sorry for anyone between me and a phone before I can call the RX to find out what is going on. To say it angered the man but he said, "okay then I'll move" on is silly. The guy has no leg to stand on when you steal money that isn't yours. His defense is based on hoping guys like FatFrank would spin this as some big Rx conspiracy.

You asked me a question Tin let me ask you one. You are a paid up advertiser and have done no wrong. When your banner gets pulled do you call the Shrink or not?